Cited by 7Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaInfection Control in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection and genetic characterization of multidrug-resistant staphylococci isolated from public areas in an international airport

Open access

Abstract

The environmental realm has been acknowledged as a pivotal arena for the emergence and propagation of antimicrobial resistance. To further explore insight into antimicrobial resistance dynamics beyond clinical and veterinary settings, we embarked on an environmental surveillance initiative targeting the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria within the bustling confines of an international airport in Japan. Our findings illuminate a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci (46.3%) on frequently contacted surfaces in the public domain. Notably, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and S. epidermidis emerged as the preeminent carriers of the mecA gene. Intriguingly, we encountered a virulent strain of livestock-associated MRSA harboring a PVL-positive ST1232 clone, CC398 lineage. Further scrutiny unveiled a repertoire of resistance mechanisms, the methicillin-resistant isolates exhibited two or more resistance genes conferring resistance against different types of antibiotics, including beta-lactams, macrolides, lincosamides, aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, and fosfomycin. Revealing multidrug-resistant CoNS and a LA-MRSA across various surfaces in urban public areas unearths a looming public health hazard. Thus, implementation of molecular surveillance is imperative, augmenting our capacity for early detection and mitigation of the insidious spread and potential transfer of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors amidst urban settings, notably within pivotal nodes such as airports.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-024-79447-3

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Key S. haemolyticus sequence types included methicillin-resistant ST1, linked to NICUs previously, and ST49, associated with children and often resistant to methicillin.

    “Of particular note, key S. haemolyticus STs included methicillin-resistant ST1, linked to NICUs previously34 and ST49, associated with children and often resistant to methicillin35,36.”

    From Impact of early life antibiotic and probiotic treatment on gut microbiome and resistome of very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. (2025) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Results section (Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus; page unavailable) identifies ST49 among methicillin-resistant S. haemolyticus isolates from airport surfaces. It does not link ST49 to children or establish that ST49 is often methicillin-resistant. The ST1/NICU clause has a separate citation in the citing sentence and is not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dewi, D. A. P. R., Khalifa, H. O., Khandar, H., Hisatsune, J., Kutuno, S., Yu, L., Hayashi, W., Kayama, S., Mason, C. E., Sugai, M., Suzuki, H., & Matsumoto, T.
Affiliations
  • Udayana University (ID)
  • Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
  • International University of Health and Welfare (JP)
  • National Institute of Infectious Diseases (JP)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Dewi, Dewa A.P. Rasmika
  • Khalifa, Hazim O.
  • Suzuki, Haruo
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
27738-27738
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404297738
Cited by
7
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP22fk0108132, JP23fk0108664)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
multidrug-resistant staphylococci, methicillin-resistant staphylococci, mecA gene, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, livestock-associated MRSA, Panton-Valentine leukocidin, CC398, coagulase-negative staphylococci, environmental surveillance, antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence factors, public health risk, molecular surveillance
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Proteins, Humans, Japan, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Airports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review