Cited by 3Machine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksProtein Structure and Dynamics

Multimodal graph, surface, and language-based model for protein protein interaction prediction

Open access
Arteaga, David, Chervov, Nikita, Poptsova, Maria·2026·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accurate prediction of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is fundamental to understanding biological processes and disease mechanisms. While deep learning offers a powerful alternative to costly experimental methods, existing approaches often overlook critical protein-surface information and rely on simplistic feature fusion techniques, thereby limiting performance. To address this, we introduce GSMFormer-PPI, a novel multimodal framework that integrates protein molecular surface features, 3D structural graphs, and residue-level sequence embeddings. Our architecture employs geometric deep learning (MaSIF) to extract physicochemical surface descriptors, graph convolutional networks to process structural context, and a transformer encoder with linear projectors to learn complex, cross-modal interactions beyond simple concatenation. GSMFormer-PPI was evaluated on a curated PINDER dataset, and direct comparisons showed that it outperforms traditional graph-based models. Furthermore, a cross-dataset comparison revealed that it achieves similar or higher performance to that reported by other top models. Ablation studies confirm the critical contribution of surface features and our advanced fusion strategy to the model's superior predictive power. This work demonstrates that the integrative analysis of surface, structure, and sequence data is a vital and promising direction for advancing PPI prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-34758-x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arteaga, D., Chervov, N., & Poptsova, M.
Affiliations
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Corresponding author
Poptsova, Maria
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-06
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
4772-4772
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7118569412
Cited by
3
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction prediction, multimodal fusion, geometric deep learning, graph convolutional networks, Transformer encoder, cross-modal feature fusion
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Language, Proteins, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review