Cited by 7Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAttachment and Relationship DynamicsGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

The long-term associations of childhood parental loss with attachment, creativity, and epigenetic regulation

Open access
Dvilansky, Adi Shapira, Zadok, Hodaya, Shoshani, Anat, Samra, Nadra Nasser, Verbeke, Willem, Vrticka, Pascal, Ein-Dor, Tsachi·2025·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The loss of a parent during childhood is a profound event with enduring impacts on psychological and emotional development. This study investigates the long-term effects of childhood parental loss on attachment patterns and openness to experience, with a focus on the epigenetic modulation of the oxytocin and dopamine systems. The sample included 371 participants (51.2% women, ages 26-43), of whom 33 experienced parental loss during childhood. In those individuals who lost a parent, findings revealed comparably lower attachment avoidance and a DNA methylation profile associated with a potential for increased oxytocin activity. Additionally, a DNA methylation profile associated with a potential for heightened dopamine activity was identified in this group, aligning with greater creativity. These findings highlight the intricate interplay of genetic and environmental factors in fostering resilience and personal growth, shedding light on the roles of oxytocin and dopamine in social bonding and the potential for long-term adaptation following early-life trauma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-025-89467-2

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. [1]Bergman, A.-S., Axberg, U. & Hanson, E. When a parent dies—A systematic review of the effects of support programs for parentally bereaved children and their caregivers. BMC Palliat. Care 16, 39. 10.1186/s12904-017-0223-y (2017). 28797262 PMC5553589 · DOI
  2. [2]Aguirre, L. V. C., Jaramillo, A. K., Saucedo Victoria, T. E. & Botero Carvajal, A. Mental health consequences of parental death and its prevalence in children: A systematic literature review. Heliyon 10, e24999. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24999 (2024). 38304821 PMC10830864 · DOI
  3. [3]Lytje, M. & Dyregrov, A. The price of loss–a literature review of the psychosocial and health consequences of childhood bereavement. Bereavement Care 38, 13–22 (2019).
  4. [4]van Heijningen, C. J. et al. Long-term effects of experiencing childhood parental death on mental and physical health: A NESDA study. Stress Health 40, e3322 (2023). 37830435
  5. [5]Hsu, M.-T., Kahn, D. L. & Huang, C.-M. No more the same: The lives of adolescents in Taiwan who have lost fathers. Fam. Community Health 25, 43–56 (2002). 11966416
  6. [6]Farella Guzzo, M. & Gobbi, G. Parental death during adolescence: A review of the literature. OMEGA-J. Death Dying 87, 1207–1237 (2023). 34324402
  7. [7]Tafà, M. et al. Predictive values of early parental loss and psychopathological risk for physical problems in early adolescents. Front. Psychol. 9, 922 (2018). 29928249 PMC5998644
  8. [8]Bergman, A.-S., Axberg, U. & Hanson, E. When a parent dies–a systematic review of the effects of support programs for parentally bereaved children and their caregivers. BMC Palliat. Care 16, 1–15 (2017). 28797262 PMC5553589
  9. [9]Atzil, S. & Barrett, L. F. Social regulation of allostasis: Commentary on “Mentalizing homeostasis: The social origins of interoceptive inference” by Fotopoulou and Tsakiris. Neuropsychoanalysis 19, 29–33. 10.1080/15294145.2017.1295214 (2017). · DOI
  10. [10]Atzil, S., Gao, W., Fradkin, I. & Barrett, L. F. Growing a social brain. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 624–636 (2018). 31346259
  11. [11]Ein-Dor, T., Mikulincer, M., Doron, G. & Shaver, P. R. The attachment paradox: How can so many of us (the insecure ones) have no adaptive advantages?. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 123–141 (2010). 26162120
  12. [12]Ein-Dor, T. & Hirschberger, G. Rethinking attachment theory: From a theory of relationships to a theory of individual and group survival. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 25, 223–227. 10.1177/0963721416650684 (2016). · DOI
  13. [14]Algoe, S. B., Kurtz, L. E. & Grewen, K. Oxytocin and social bonds: The role of oxytocin in perceptions of romantic partners’ bonding behavior. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1763–1772 (2017). 28968183 PMC5734372
  14. [16]Quintana, D. S. & Guastella, A. J. An allostatic theory of oxytocin. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24, 515–528. 10.1016/j.tics.2020.03.008 (2020). 32360118 · DOI
  15. [17]Heim, C. et al. Lower CSF oxytocin concentrations in women with a history of childhood abuse. Mol. Psychiatry 14, 954–958. 10.1038/mp.2008.112 (2009). 18957940 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [18]Myers, A. J. et al. Variation in the oxytocin receptor gene is associated with increased risk for anxiety, stress and depression in individuals with a history of exposure to early life stress. J. Psychiatr. Res. 59, 93–100. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.08.021 (2014). 25262417 PMC4252971 · DOI
  17. [19]Ein-Dor, T., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Mokry, M. & Vrtička, P. Epigenetic modification of the oxytocin and glucocorticoid receptor genes is linked to attachment avoidance in young adults. Attach. Hum. Dev. 20, 439–454. 10.1080/14616734.2018.1446451 (2018). 29513137 · DOI
  18. [20]Thaler, L. et al. Methylation of the OXTR gene in women with anorexia nervosa: Relationship to social behavior. Eur. Eating Disord. Rev. 28, 79–86 (2020). 31823473
  19. [21]Pérez, R. F. et al. Longitudinal genome-wide DNA methylation analysis uncovers persistent early-life DNA methylation changes. J. Transl. Med. 10.1186/s12967-018-1751-9 (2019). 30626398 PMC6327427 · DOI
  20. [22]Mansell, G. et al. Guidance for DNA methylation studies: statistical insights from the Illumina EPIC array. BMC Genom. 10.1186/s12864-019-5761-7 (2019). PMC6518823 31088362 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [23]Chater, A. M., Howlett, N., Shorter, G. W., Zakrzewski-Fruer, J. K. & Williams, J. Reflections on experiencing parental bereavement as a young person: A retrospective qualitative study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 2083 (2022). 35206275 PMC8872611
  22. [24]Reyes, M. et al. Link between adverse childhood experiences and five factor model traits among Filipinos. IAFOR J. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 4, 71 (2018).
  23. [25]Davis, C. A. et al. Dopamine for “wanting” and opioids for “liking”: A comparison of obese adults with and without binge eating. Obesity 17, 1220–1225 (2009). 19282821
  24. [26]Pecina, S., Cagniard, B., Berridge, K. C., Aldridge, J. W. & Zhuang, X. Hyperdopaminergic mutant mice have higher “wanting” but not “liking” for sweet rewards. J. Neurosci. 23, 9395–9402 (2003). 14561867 PMC6740586
  25. [27]Rentesi, G. et al. Early maternal deprivation-induced modifications in the neurobiological, neurochemical and behavioral profile of adult rats. Behav. Brain Res. 244, 29–37 (2013). 23395600
  26. [28]Brake, W. G., Zhang, T. Y., Diorio, J., Meaney, M. J. & Gratton, A. Influence of early postnatal rearing conditions on mesocorticolimbic dopamine and behavioural responses to psychostimulants and stressors in adult rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 1863–1874 (2004). 15078560
  27. [29]Peña, C. J., Neugut, Y. D., Calarco, C. A. & Champagne, F. A. Effects of maternal care on the development of midbrain dopamine pathways and reward-directed behavior in female offspring. Eur. J. Neurosci. 39, 946–956 (2014). 24446918
  28. [31]Lundberg, T., Årestedt, K., Olsson, M., Alvariza, A. & Forinder, U. Posttraumatic growth after struggling with the loss of a parent in young adulthood. OMEGA-J. Death Dying 10.1177/00302228231187175 (2023). PMC12508490 37385294 · DOI
  29. [32]Mikulincer, M. & Florian, V. Handbook of Emotion, Adult Development, and Aging 269–285 (Elsevier, 1996).
  30. [33]Saucier, G. Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: Indications for a Big Six structure. J. Personal. 77, 1577–1614 (2009). 19678873
  31. [34]Ashton, M. C. & Lee, K. The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. J. Personal. Assess. 91, 340–345 (2009). 20017063
  32. [35]Zettler, I., Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E. & Moshagen, M. The nomological net of the HEXACO model of personality: A large-scale meta-analytic investigation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 723–760 (2020). 32324493
  33. [36]Forgeard, M., Bayer-Pacht, E., Silvia, P. J., Roepke, A. M. & Björgvinsson, T. Openness to experience and post-traumatic growth. In Redesigning Research on Post-Traumatic Growth: Challenges, Pitfalls, and New Directions (eds Infurna, F. J. & Jayawickreme, E.) 225–241 (Oxford University Press, 2021).
  34. [37]Maurer, M. M., Maurer, J., Hoff, E. & Daukantaitė, D. What is the process of personal growth? Introducing the personal growth process model. New Ideas Psychol. 70, 101024 (2023).
  35. [38]Habib, A., Stevelink, S., Greenberg, N. & Williamson, V. Post-traumatic growth in (ex-) military personnel: Review and qualitative synthesis. Occupl Medl 68, 617–625 (2018). 30590773
  36. [41]John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (ed. Pervin, L. A.) 102–138 (Guilford Press, 1999).
  37. [42]Karanci, A. N. et al. Personality, posttraumatic stress and trauma type: Factors contributing to posttraumatic growth and its domains in a Turkish community sample. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 3, 17303 (2012). PMC3402104 22893832
  38. [43]Mattson, E., James, L. & Engdahl, B. Personality factors and their impact on PTSD and post-traumatic growth is mediated by coping style among OIF/OEF veterans. Military Med. 183, e475–e480 (2018). 29590428
  39. [45]Ryff, C. D. Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother. Psychosomat. 83, 10–28 (2013). PMC4241300 24281296
  40. [49]Ren, R. et al. Structural basis of specific DNA binding by the transcription factor ZBTB24. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 8388–8398. 10.1093/nar/gkz557 (2019). 31226215 PMC6895263 · DOI
  41. [50]Li, J. et al. ZKSCAN5 activates VEGFC expression by recruiting SETD7 to promote the lymphangiogenesis, tumour growth, and metastasis of breast cancer. Front. Oncol. 12, 875033 (2022). 35600335 PMC9117617
  42. [51]Xiong, Z. et al. EWAS Open Platform: Integrated data, knowledge and toolkit for epigenome-wide association study. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D1004-d1009. 10.1093/nar/gkab972 (2022). 34718752 PMC8728289 · DOI
  43. [52]Ryzhakov, G., Eames, H. L. & Udalova, I. A. Activation and function of interferon regulatory factor 5. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 35, 71–78 (2015). 25259415
  44. [53]Abate, C., Luk, D. & Curran, T. Transcriptional regulation by Fos and Jun in vitro: Interaction among multiple activator and regulatory domains. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 3624–3632. 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3624-3632.1991 (1991). 1904542 PMC361111 · DOI
  45. [54]Braun, P. et al. IMAGE-CpG: Development of a web-based search tool for genome-wide DNA methylation correlation between live human brain and peripheral tissues within individuals. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 29, S796 (2019). PMC6355837 30705257
  46. [55]Stubbs, L., Sun, Y. & Caetano-Anolles, D. Function and evolution of C2H2 Zinc finger arrays. Subcell Biochem. 52, 75–94. 10.1007/978-90-481-9069-0_4 (2011). 21557079 · DOI
  47. [56]England-Mason, G., MacMillan, H. L., Atkinson, L., Steiner, M. & Gonzalez, A. Emotion regulation moderates between maternal adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and oxytocin response. Arch. Women’s Mental Health 25, 421–430. 10.1007/s00737-021-01194-5 (2022). 34751819 · DOI
  48. [57]Ochedalski, T., Subburaju, S., Wynn, P. & Aguilera, G. Interaction between oestrogen and oxytocin on Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis activity. J. Neuroendocrinol. 19, 189–197 (2007). 17280592
  49. [58]Smith, A. S. et al. Local oxytocin tempers anxiety by activating GABAA receptors in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Psychoneuroendocrinology 63, 50–58 (2016). 26415118 PMC4695278
  50. [59]Long, M., Verbeke, W. J., Ein-Dor, T. & Vrtička, P. A functional Neuro-Anatomical Model of Human Attachment (NAMA): Insights from first- and second-person social neuroscience. Cortex 126, 281–321 (2020). 32092496
  51. [60]Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and Anger (Basic Books, 1973).
  52. [61]Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment 2nd edn. (Basic Books, 1982).
  53. [62]Loth, M. K. & Donaldson, Z. R. Oxytocin, dopamine, and opioid interactions underlying pair bonding: Highlighting a potential role for microglia. Endocrinology 162, bqaa223 (2021). 33367612 PMC7787427
  54. [63]Xiao, L., Priest, M. F., Nasenbeny, J., Lu, T. & Kozorovitskiy, Y. Biased oxytocinergic modulation of midbrain dopamine systems. Neuron 95, 368-384. e365 (2017). 28669546 PMC7881764
  55. [64]Zhang, M., Balmadrid, C. & Kelley, A. E. Nucleus accumbens opioid, GABaergic, and dopaminergic modulation of palatable food motivation: Contrasting effects revealed by a progressive ratio study in the rat. Behav. Neurosci. 117, 202 (2003). 12708516
  56. [66]Bosmans, G., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Vervliet, B., Verhees, M. & van IJzendoorn,. A learning theory of attachment: Unraveling the black box of attachment development. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 113, 287–298. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.014 (2020). 32276142 · DOI
  57. [67]Izaki, A., Verbeke, W. J., Vrtička, P. & Ein Dor, T. A Narrative on the Neurobiological Roots of Attachment-System Functioning. Commun. Psychol.96, 1-10 (2024). PMC11480372 39406946
  58. [68]Berridge, K. C. & Robinson, T. E. Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Am. Psychol. 71, 670 (2016). 27977239 PMC5171207
  59. [71]Anselme, P. & Robinson, M. J. “Wanting”,“liking”, and their relation to consciousness. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Learn. Cogn. 42, 123 (2016). 26651179
  60. [72]Hardman, C. A., Herbert, V. M., Brunstrom, J. M., Munafò, M. R. & Rogers, P. J. Dopamine and food reward: Effects of acute tyrosine/phenylalanine depletion on appetite. Physiol. Behav. 105, 1202–1207 (2012). 22230253
  61. [73]Berridge, K. C., Robinson, T. E. & Aldridge, J. W. Dissecting components of reward: “Liking”, “wanting”, and learning. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 9, 65–73. 10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014 (2009). 19162544 PMC2756052 · DOI · Paper page
  62. [74]Nunes, A. P. et al. Quality of DNA extracted from saliva samples collected with the Oragene™ DNA self-collection kit. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 12, 65 (2012). 22559914 PMC3422993
  63. [76]Zhang, B. et al. Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm. Genome Res. 23, 1522–1540 (2013). 23804400 PMC3759728
  64. [77]Zheng, S. C. et al. A novel cell-type deconvolution algorithm reveals substantial contamination by immune cells in saliva, buccal and cervix. Epigenomics 10, 925–940. 10.2217/epi-2018-0037 (2018). 29693419 · DOI
  65. [78]Rauluseviciute, I. et al. JASPAR 2024: 20th anniversary of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D174–D182. 10.1093/nar/gkad1059 (2023). PMC10767809 37962376 · DOI
  66. [79]Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M. & Brumbaugh, C. C. The experiences in close relationships—Relationship Structures Questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychol. Assess. 23, 615 (2011). 21443364
  67. [80]Fraley, R. C., Hudson, N. W., Heffernan, M. E. & Segal, N. Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 109, 354 (2015). 25559192
  68. [81]Fraley, R. C., Vicary, A. M., Brumbaugh, C. C. & Roisman, G. I. Patterns of stability in adult attachment: An empirical test of two models of continuity and change. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 101, 974 (2011). 21707199

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dvilansky, A. S., Zadok, H., Shoshani, A., Samra, N. N., Verbeke, W., Vrticka, P., & Ein-Dor, T.
Affiliations
  • Reichman University (IL)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-10
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
4859-4859
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407287199
Cited by
7
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2
FWCI
7.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
attachment avoidance, openness to experience, creativity, DNA methylation, oxytocin, dopamine, epigenetic regulation, early trauma, resilience, social bonding
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Creativity, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Male, Object Attachment, Oxytocin, Parents, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review