Cited by 1,942Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Dissecting components of reward: ‘liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning

Open access
Berridge, Kent C, Robinson, Terry E, Aldridge, J Wayne·2009·Current Opinion in Pharmacology

Abstract

In recent years significant progress has been made delineating the psychological components of reward and their underlying neural mechanisms. Here we briefly highlight findings on three dissociable psychological components of reward: 'liking' (hedonic impact), 'wanting' (incentive salience), and learning (predictive associations and cognitions). A better understanding of the components of reward, and their neurobiological substrates, may help in devising improved treatments for disorders of mood and motivation, ranging from depression to eating disorders, drug addiction, and related compulsive pursuits of rewards.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing incentive sensitization, as a result of conditioning processes, may associate with attentional bias and cue-reactivity in later stages of addiction processes.

    “Increasing incentive sensitization, as a result of conditioning processes (Berridge et al., 2009), may associate with attentional bias and cue-reactivity in later stages of addiction processes.”

    From The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors (2019) · cites this paper as Berridge et al., 2009

    In the Introduction (‘Wanting’; page unavailable), the paper says conditioned reward cues acquire incentive salience and can trigger ‘wanting.’ But its Neurobiological substrates for ‘wanting’ section describes neural sensitization as arising from drugs of abuse, not conditioning processes. The cited passage therefore supports the role of conditioning in cue-related motivation, but not the claim that conditioning increases incentive sensitization. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The importance of conditioning in the development of addictive behaviors has been suggested theoretically, for example within the incentive sensitization theory, and has been demonstrated empirically in substance addictions.

    “The importance of conditioning in the development of addictive behaviors has been suggested theoretically, for example within the incentive sensitization theory (Berridge et al., 2009;Robinson and Berridge, 1993, 2001, 2008), and has been demonstrated empirically in substance addictions (Duka et al., 2011;Hogarth et al., 2010Hogarth et al., , 2006;;Loeber and Duka, 2009), for example using the Pav”
  • Reward has wanting and liking components that apply to social signals.

    “There are two components of reward –‘wanting’ and ‘liking’ [10], see Glossary– both of which apply to social signals.”

    From The social motivation theory of autism (2012) · cites this paper as [10]

  • Subcortical structures are most involved in generating reward utilities but require cortical involvement for conscious hedonic representations.

    “Subcortical structures are most involved in the generation of reward utilities, but require cortical involvement for conscious hedonic representations [10].”

    From The social motivation theory of autism (2012) · cites this paper as [10]

  • Engagement of reward circuitry in social deficit may enhance the rewarding value of social contact, similar to how food deprivation enhances the rewarding properties of food.

    “Engagement of reward circuitry in situations of social deficit may enhance the rewarding value of social contact—potentially similar to how food deprivation enhances the rewarding properties of food219–222.”

    From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [220]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [32]Aldridge JW Berridge KC Kringelbach ML Berridge KC Neural coding of pleasure: “Rose-Tinted Glasses” of the ventral pallidum Pleasures of the Brain Oxford University Press in press.
  2. [34]Dickinson A Balleine B Kringelbach ML Berridge KC Hedonics: the cognitive–motivational interface Pleasures of the Brain Oxford University Press in press.
  3. [64]Leyton M Kringelbach ML Berridge KC The neurobiology of desire: dopamine and the regulation of mood and motivational states in humans Pleasures of the Brain Oxford University Press in press.
  4. [67]Tindell AJ Smith KS Berridge KC Aldridge JW Ventral pallidal neurons integrate learning and physiological signals to code incentive salience of conditioned cues Society for Neuroscience Conference 2005 November 12, 2005 Washington, DC

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berridge, K. C., Robinson, T. E., & Aldridge, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Berridge, Kent C
Venue
Current Opinion in Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
65-73
ISSN
1471-4892 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149514160
Cited by
1,942
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 276 · 2019: 201 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 128 · 2014: 106 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 90
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
reward, liking, want, incentive salience, reward learning, motivation, mood disorders, depression, eating disorders, drug addiction, compulsive behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Emotions, Humans, Learning, Motivation, Reward, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review