Cited by 5Phytochemical and Pharmacological StudiesCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Comparative study of palmitoleic acid, sea buckthorn oil, and lovastatin in hepatocellular steatosis model

Open access

Abstract

Palmitoleic acid (POA) has been associated with various metabolic effects, including regulating lipid metabolism and cholesterol production. In this study, we explored the impact of both cis - (cPOA) and trans -palmitoleic acid (tPOA), along with sea buckthorn oil (SBO), a natural source rich in cPOA, on lipid content, metabolic activity, and Rap1 prenylation in HepG2 cells. We employed a free fatty acids-induced steatosis model. Our findings revealed that neither cPOA, tPOA, SBO, nor digested SBO impaired the metabolic activity of HepG2 cells, even under steatotic conditions. All treatments led to triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation, with tPOA demonstrating the beneficial effect. While cholesterol levels remained unchanged in normal cells, a reduction was noted in steatotic cells, comparable to the effect of lovastatin. Molecular docking suggested that both POA isomers may bind and block the catalytic pocket of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR). To further explore this, we examined their influence on Rap1 prenylation and subcellular localization. Under steatotic conditions, both POA isomers, particularly at concentrations of 50 and 100 µM, elevated cytosolic Rap1 levels, whereas no significant changes were observed in membrane or cytosolic Rap1a protein levels in normal HepG2 cultures. Notably, unlike lovastatin, POA isomers and digested SBO enhanced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from pancreatic cells. Our results highlight the potential of POA isomers and SBO as modulators of lipid metabolism, cholesterol production, and insulin secretion, suggesting their relevance in managing metabolic disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-026-37006-y

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Impact of a mixture of palmitic acid (PA) and oleic acid (OA) used at various concentrations on lipid accumulation and viability in HepG2 cells. A: Representative images of HepG2 cells stained with Nile Red, captured under both visible and fluorescent light (Ex: 482/35, Em: 536/40). B: Cellular viability assessed after 24-h incubation with PA/OA mixtures. C: Quantitative analysis of intracellular lipid content using Nile Red staining. D: TAG accumulation in control and steatotic cells (300 µM PA/OA) measured with Triglyceride Colorimetric Assay Kit. The results are representative of at least five independent biological replicates (n = 5). The bars represent the means ± SEM. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 versus control. Images of HepG2 cells under visible and fluorescent light (Ex: 482/35, Em: 536/40). cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; FFA, free fatty acid; SBO, sea buckthorn oil; TAG, triacylglycerol; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.
Fig. 1 Impact of a mixture of palmitic acid (PA) and oleic acid (OA) used at various concentrations on lipid accumulation and viability in HepG2 cells. A: Representative images of HepG2 cells stained with Nile Red, captured under both visible and fluorescent light (Ex: 482/35, Em: 536/40). B: Cellular viability assessed after 24-h incubation with PA/OA mixtures. C: Quantitative analysis of intracellular lipid content using Nile Red staining. D: TAG accumulation in control and steatotic cells (300 µM PA/OA) measured with Triglyceride Colorimetric Assay Kit. The results are representative of at least five independent biological replicates (n = 5). The bars represent the means ± SEM. ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 versus control. Images of HepG2 cells under visible and fluorescent light (Ex: 482/35, Em: 536/40). cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; FFA, free fatty acid; SBO, sea buckthorn oil; TAG, triacylglycerol; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Effects of cPOA, tPOA, SBO, and digested SBO on viability and lipid accumulation in control and FFA-induced steatostic HepG2 cells. A: Viability of control cells treated with increasing concentrations (5–100 µM) of the tested compounds. For SBO, concentrations were adjusted based on POA content. B: Viability of cells with FFA-induced steatosis (300 µM PA/OA) following treatment with the same concentration range of compounds. Viability was assessed at 24 (A1, B1), 48 (A2, B2), and 72 (A3, B3) hours; bar shading intensity corresponds to increasing concentrations: 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 µM. C: Quantitative detection of lipid accumulation in control cells using Nile Red fluorescence staining. D: Quantitative detection of lipids with Nile Red staining in steatosis-induced cells (300 µM PA/OA). E: TAG accumulation in control cells measured with a Triglyceride Colorimetric Assay Kit. F: TAG accumulation in steatotic cells measured with a Triglyceride Colorimetric Assay Kit. Nile Red staining and TAG detection were conducted after 24 h of incubation with the tested compounds. Data represent at least 8 independent biological replicates (n = 8). The bars represent the means ± SEM. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 versus control. cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; FFA, free fatty acid; OA/PA, oleic acid/palmitic acid; SBO, sea buckthorn oil; TAG, triacylglycerol; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.
Fig. 2 Effects of cPOA, tPOA, SBO, and digested SBO on viability and lipid accumulation in control and FFA-induced steatostic HepG2 cells. A: Viability of control cells treated with increasing concentrations (5–100 µM) of the tested compounds. For SBO, concentrations were adjusted based on POA content. B: Viability of cells with FFA-induced steatosis (300 µM PA/OA) following treatment with the same concentration range of compounds. Viability was assessed at 24 (A1, B1), 48 (A2, B2), and 72 (A3, B3) hours; bar shading intensity corresponds to increasing concentrations: 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 µM. C: Quantitative detection of lipid accumulation in control cells using Nile Red fluorescence staining. D: Quantitative detection of lipids with Nile Red staining in steatosis-induced cells (300 µM PA/OA). E: TAG accumulation in control cells measured with a Triglyceride Colorimetric Assay Kit. F: TAG accumulation in steatotic cells measured with a Triglyceride Colorimetric Assay Kit. Nile Red staining and TAG detection were conducted after 24 h of incubation with the tested compounds. Data represent at least 8 independent biological replicates (n = 8). The bars represent the means ± SEM. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 versus control. cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; FFA, free fatty acid; OA/PA, oleic acid/palmitic acid; SBO, sea buckthorn oil; TAG, triacylglycerol; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Effects of cPOA, tPOA, SBO, and digested SBO on intracellular cholesterol content (A, B) and HMGCR gene expression (C, D) in control (A, C) and FFA-induced steatotic (B, D) HepG2 cells. Cells were exposed to indicated concentrations of compounds or 5 µM lovastatin. Results represent at least 3 independent biological samples with 3 repeats each (n = 3). The bars represent the means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 versus control. βACT, β-aktyna; cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; FFA, free fatty acid; OA/PA, oleic acid/palmitic acid; SBO, sea buckthorn oil; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.
Fig. 3 Effects of cPOA, tPOA, SBO, and digested SBO on intracellular cholesterol content (A, B) and HMGCR gene expression (C, D) in control (A, C) and FFA-induced steatotic (B, D) HepG2 cells. Cells were exposed to indicated concentrations of compounds or 5 µM lovastatin. Results represent at least 3 independent biological samples with 3 repeats each (n = 3). The bars represent the means ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 versus control. βACT, β-aktyna; cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; FFA, free fatty acid; OA/PA, oleic acid/palmitic acid; SBO, sea buckthorn oil; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Molecular docking of cPOA, tPOA, HMGCoA, and lovastatin acid into HMGCoA reductase. Mean score and energy value were presented with the means ± SD from at least 10 experiments. The location of the molecule in the catalytic pocket, with the most important amino acid residues within the binding pocket, is shown on the bottom. The neighbouring amino acid residues are listed in the table, with those forming hydrogen bonds with the molecule highlighted in green. cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A; LOV ACID, lovastatin acid; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.
Fig. 4 Molecular docking of cPOA, tPOA, HMGCoA, and lovastatin acid into HMGCoA reductase. Mean score and energy value were presented with the means ± SD from at least 10 experiments. The location of the molecule in the catalytic pocket, with the most important amino acid residues within the binding pocket, is shown on the bottom. The neighbouring amino acid residues are listed in the table, with those forming hydrogen bonds with the molecule highlighted in green. cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A; LOV ACID, lovastatin acid; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Effect of cPOA, tPOA, SBO, and SBO digested on Rap1A prenylation in HepG2 cells. Control (A, B and E, F) and FFA-induced steatotic cells (C, D and G, H) were exposed to indicated concentrations of compounds or 5 µM lovastatin (Lov) for 48 h. Subsequently, cells were lysed and isolation of cytosolic and membrane proteins was performed. Cytosolic fractions containing unprenylated proteins were western blotted for Rap1A and β-actin (A, C and E, G), and the immunoblot bands were quantified by densitometry analysis, normalized to β-actin, and presented as a percentage of controls (B, D and F, H). Lovastatin was used as a positive control. Treatment of cells with lovastatin should prevent the Rap1A accumulation at the membrane. Data represented mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments (n = 3); *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001. Cropped gels are presented here; full-length gels and blots without cropping are included in the Supplementary Information file. cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; FFA, free fatty acid; OA/PA, oleic acid/palmitic acid; SBO, sea buckthorn oil; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.
Fig. 5 Effect of cPOA, tPOA, SBO, and SBO digested on Rap1A prenylation in HepG2 cells. Control (A, B and E, F) and FFA-induced steatotic cells (C, D and G, H) were exposed to indicated concentrations of compounds or 5 µM lovastatin (Lov) for 48 h. Subsequently, cells were lysed and isolation of cytosolic and membrane proteins was performed. Cytosolic fractions containing unprenylated proteins were western blotted for Rap1A and β-actin (A, C and E, G), and the immunoblot bands were quantified by densitometry analysis, normalized to β-actin, and presented as a percentage of controls (B, D and F, H). Lovastatin was used as a positive control. Treatment of cells with lovastatin should prevent the Rap1A accumulation at the membrane. Data represented mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments (n = 3); *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001. Cropped gels are presented here; full-length gels and blots without cropping are included in the Supplementary Information file. cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; FFA, free fatty acid; OA/PA, oleic acid/palmitic acid; SBO, sea buckthorn oil; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Effect of cPOA, tPOA, SBO, and SBO digested on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in MIN6 cells. Cells were exposed to indicated concentrations of compounds or 5 µM lovastatin for 24 h. Data represented mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments (n = 3); ####p ≤ 0.0001 versus 2 mM glucose control, ****p ≤ 0.0001 versus 20 mM glucose control. cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; SBO, sea buckthorn oil; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.
Fig. 6 Effect of cPOA, tPOA, SBO, and SBO digested on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in MIN6 cells. Cells were exposed to indicated concentrations of compounds or 5 µM lovastatin for 24 h. Data represented mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments (n = 3); ####p ≤ 0.0001 versus 2 mM glucose control, ****p ≤ 0.0001 versus 20 mM glucose control. cPOA, cis-palmitoleic acid; SBO, sea buckthorn oil; tPOA, trans-palmitoleic acid.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Effects of POA isomers, digested sea buckthorn oil (SBO) and lovastatin on cholesterol synthesis, Rap1a activation, and insulin secretion. The left panel outlines the pathway from HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) expression through the mevalonate pathway to cholesterol synthesis and subsequent Rap1a activation in liver cells. The right panel details how different concentrations of cPOA, tPOA, SBO, and Lovastatin influence the prenylation status and subcellular localization of Rap1a (cytosolic inactive vs. membrane-bound active form). The bottom section connects these molecular events to physiological outcomes, showing the impact on hepatic gluconeogenesis and pancreatic insulin secretion (created by BioRender.com).
Fig. 7 Effects of POA isomers, digested sea buckthorn oil (SBO) and lovastatin on cholesterol synthesis, Rap1a activation, and insulin secretion. The left panel outlines the pathway from HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) expression through the mevalonate pathway to cholesterol synthesis and subsequent Rap1a activation in liver cells. The right panel details how different concentrations of cPOA, tPOA, SBO, and Lovastatin influence the prenylation status and subcellular localization of Rap1a (cytosolic inactive vs. membrane-bound active form). The bottom section connects these molecular events to physiological outcomes, showing the impact on hepatic gluconeogenesis and pancreatic insulin secretion (created by BioRender.com).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 50 · Cited by 5

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Rinella, M. E. & Sookoian, S. From NAFLD to MASLD: updated naming and diagnosis criteria for fatty liver disease. J. Lipid Res. 65, 100485 (2024). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Portincasa, P. et al. Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated steatotic liver disease: from pathogenesis to current therapeutic options. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 5640 (2024). · DOI
  3. Mocciaro, G. et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is characterised by a reduced polyunsaturated fatty acid transport via free fatty acids and high-density lipoproteins (HDL). Mol. Metab. 73, 101728 (2023). · DOI
  4. Min, H. K. et al. Increased hepatic synthesis and dysregulation of cholesterol metabolism is associated with the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell. Metab. 15, 665–674 (2012). · DOI
  5. Souza, C. O. et al. Palmitoleic acid reduces high fat diet-induced liver inflammation by promoting PPAR-γ-independent M2a polarization of myeloid cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell. Biol. Lipids. 1865, 158776–158776 (2020). · DOI
  6. Hodson, L., Skeaff, C. M. & Fielding, B. A. Fatty acid composition of adipose tissue and blood in humans and its use as a biomarker of dietary intake. Prog Lipid Res. 47, 348–380 (2008). · DOI
  7. Chen, Y., Cai, Y., Wang, K. & Wang, Y. Bioactive Compounds in Sea Buckthorn and their Efficacy in Preventing and Treating Metabolic Syndrome. Foods vol. 12 Preprint at (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12101985 · DOI
  8. Liu, J. et al. Superfruits in China: Bioactive phytochemicals and their potential health benefits – A Review. Food Science and Nutrition 9 6892–6902 Preprint at (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2614 · DOI
  9. Destaillats, F., Wolff, R. L., Precht, D. & Molkentin, J. Study of individual trans- and cis-16:1 isomers in cow, goat, and Ewe cheese fats by gas-liquid chromatography with emphasis on the trans-delta3 isomer. Lipids 35, 1027–1032 (2000). · DOI
  10. Guillocheau, E. et al. Current intakes of trans-palmitoleic (trans-C16:1 n-7) and trans-vaccenic (trans-C18:1 n-7) acids in France are exclusively ensured by ruminant milk and ruminant meat: A market basket investigation. Food Chem. X. 5, 100081 (2020). · DOI
  11. Mozaffarian, D. et al. Trans-palmitoleic acid, metabolic risk factors, and new-onset diabetes in U.S. Adults: a cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 153, 790–799 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Huang, W. W. et al. Cis- and Trans-Palmitoleic acid isomers regulate cholesterol metabolism in different ways. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 602115 (2020). · DOI
  13. Guo, X. et al. The Role of Palmitoleic Acid in Regulating Hepatic Gluconeogenesis through SIRT3 in Obese Mice. Nutrients 14, (2022). · DOI
  14. Chávaro-Ortiz, L. I., Tapia, B. D., Rico-Hidalgo, M., Gutiérrez-Aguilar, R. & Frigolet, M. E. Trans-palmitoleic acid reduces adiposity via increased lipolysis in a rodent model of diet-induced obesity. Br. J. Nutr. 127, 801–809 (2022). · DOI
  15. Lee, J. J. et al. Palmitoleic acid is elevated in fatty liver disease and reflects hepatic lipogenesis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 101, 34–43 (2015). · DOI
  16. Korkus, E. et al. Trans-palmitoleic acid, a dairy fat biomarker, stimulates insulin secretion and activates G protein-coupled receptors with a different mechanism from the Cis isomer. Food Funct. 14, 6496–6512 (2023). · DOI
  17. Nogueira, J. P. & Cusi, K. Role of insulin resistance in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in people with type 2 diabetes: from bench to patient care. Diabetes Spectr. 37, 20–28 (2024). · DOI
  18. Dąbrowski, G. et al. Composition of flesh lipids and oleosome yield optimization of selected sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) cultivars grown in Poland. Food Chem. 369, 130921 (2022). · DOI
  19. Müller, F. A. & Sturla, S. J. Human in vitro models of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 16, 9–16 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Moravcová, A. et al. The effect of oleic and palmitic acid on induction of steatosis and cytotoxicity on rat hepatocytes in primary culture. Physiol. Res. 64, S627–S636 (2015). · DOI
  21. Rida, R. & Kreydiyyeh, S. Effect of FTY720P on lipid accumulation in HEPG2 cells. Scientific Reports 2023 13:1 13, 1–15 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Donato, M. T. et al. Effects of steatosis on drug-metabolizing capability of primary human hepatocytes. Toxicol. In Vitro. 21, 271–276 (2007). · DOI
  23. Korkus, E. et al. Evaluation of the anti-diabetic activity of sea Buckthorn pulp oils prepared with different extraction methods in human islet EndoC-betaH1 cells. NFS J. 27, 54–66 (2022). · DOI
  24. Istvan, E. S. & Deisenhofer, J. Structural mechanism for Statin Inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Sci. (1979). 292, 1160–1164 (2001).
  25. Moghadasian, M. H. Clinical Pharmacology of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Life Sci. 65, 1329–1337 (1999). · DOI
  26. Istvan, E. S., Palnitkar, M., Buchanan, S. K. & Deisenhofer, J. Crystal structure of the catalytic portion of human HMG-CoA reductase: insights into regulation of activity and catalysis. EMBO J. 19, 819–830 (2000). · DOI
  27. Wang, Y., Spolitu, S., Zadroga, J. A., Sarecha, A. K. & Ozcan, L. Hepatocyte Rap1a contributes to obesity- and statin-associated hyperglycemia. Cell. Rep. 40, 111259 (2022). · DOI
  28. Kusy, D. et al. Synthesis of the 6-Substituted Imidazo[1,2-a]Pyridine-3-yl-2- phosphonopropionic acids as potential inhibitors of Rab geranylgeranyl transferase. Front. Chem. 8, 596162 (2021). · DOI
  29. Vuille-Lessard, É., Lange, N., Riebensahm, C., Dufour, J. F. & Berzigotti, A. Dietary Interventions in Liver Diseases: Focus on MAFLD and Cirrhosis. (1901). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-021-00563-z · DOI
  30. Notarnicola, M. et al. Synergic effect of eicosapentaenoic acid and Lovastatin on gene expression of HMGCoA reductase and LDL receptor in cultured HepG2 cells. Lipids Health Dis. 9, 135 (2010). · DOI
  31. Cruz, M. M. et al. Palmitoleic acid decreases Non-alcoholic hepatic steatosis and increases lipogenesis and fatty acid oxidation in adipose tissue from obese mice. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 11, 537061 (2020). · DOI
  32. Yang, Z. H., Miyahara, H. & Hatanaka, A. Chronic administration of palmitoleic acid reduces insulin resistance and hepatic lipid accumulation in KK-Ay mice with genetic type 2 diabetes. Lipids Health Dis. 10, 120 (2011). · DOI
  33. Farokh Nezhad, R., Nourbakhsh, M., Razzaghy-Azar, M., Sharifi, R. & Yaghmaei, P. The effect of trans-palmitoleic acid on cell viability and Sirtuin 1 gene expression in hepatocytes and the activity of peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor-alpha. J. Res. Med. Sci. 25, 105 (2020). · DOI
  34. Duan, Y. et al. Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis in health and diseases: from mechanisms to targeted therapeutics. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 7, 1–29 (2022). (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ishikawa, T. et al. Concomitant Attenuation of HMG-CoA reductase expression potentiates the cancer cell growth-inhibitory effect of Statins and expands their efficacy in tumor cells with epithelial characteristics. Oncotarget 9, 29304–29315 (2018). · DOI
  36. Trub, A. G. et al. Statin therapy inhibits fatty acid synthase via dynamic protein modifications. Nat. Commun. 13, 2542 (2022). · DOI
  37. Natali, F., Siculella, L., Salvati, S. & Gnoni, G. V. Oleic acid is a potent inhibitor of fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis in C6 glioma cells. J. Lipid Res. 48, 1966–1975 (2007). · DOI
  38. Notarnicola, M. et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids reduce fatty acid synthase and Hydroxy-Methyl-Glutaryl CoA-Reductase gene expression and promote apoptosis in HepG2 cell line. Lipids Health Dis. 10, 10 (2011). · DOI
  39. DeBose-Boyd, R. A. & Ye, J. SREBPs in Lipid Metabolism, Insulin Signaling, and Beyond. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 43 358–368 Preprint at (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2018.01.005 · DOI
  40. Wu, N. et al. Activation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase during high fat diet feeding. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1832, 1560–1568 (2013). · DOI
  41. Marchwicka, A., Kamińska, D., Monirialamdari, M., Błażewska, K. M. & Gendaszewska-Darmach, E. Protein prenyltransferases and their inhibitors: structural and functional characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105424 (2022). 23 Preprint at. · DOI
  42. Spolitu, S. et al. Hepatic glucagon signaling regulates PCSK9 and Low-Density lipoprotein cholesterol. Circ. Res. 124, 38–51 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Taylor, B. A. & Thompson, P. D. Statins and their effect on PCSK9-Impact and clinical relevance. Curr. Atheroscler Rep. 18, 46–46 (2016). · DOI
  44. Wu, J., Wong, W. L., Khosravi, F., Minden, M. D. & Penn, L. Z. Blocking the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway sensitizes acute myelogenous leukemia cells to Lovastatin-Induced apoptosis. Cancer Res. 64 (18), 6461–6468 (2004). http://www.stanford.edu/group/nolan/protocols/pro_optimiz.html · DOI
  45. Jaśkiewicz, A., Pajką, B. & Orzechowski, A. The many faces of Rap1 GTPase. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 (10), 2848 (2018). · DOI
  46. Hao, M., Head, W. S., Gunawardana, S. C., Hasty, A. H. & Piston, D. W. Direct effect of cholesterol on insulin secretiona novel mechanism for pancreatic β-Cell dysfunction. Diabetes 56, 2328–2338 (2007). · DOI
  47. Hao, M. & Bogan, J. S. Cholesterol regulates Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion through phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 29489 (2009). · DOI
  48. Korkus, E. et al. The insulinotropic activity of oleosomes prepared from various sea Buckthorn cultivars in mouse and human pancreatic β cell lines. NFS J. 31, 142–154 (2023). · DOI
  49. Miyazaki, J. I. et al. Establishment of a pancreatic beta cell line that retains glucose-inducible insulin secretion: special reference to expression of glucose transporter isoforms. Endocrinology 127, 126–132 (1990). · DOI
  50. Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta delta C(T)) method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001). · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Szustak, M., Pichlak, M., Korkus, E., Kamińska, D., Koziołkiewicz, M., Dąbrowski, G., Czaplicki, S., Konopka, I., & Gendaszewska-Darmach, E.
Affiliations
  • Lodz University of Technology (PL)
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-24
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
6135-6135
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7125596720
Cited by
5
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
52.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
The National Science Centre, Poland (2018/31/B/NZ9/02433)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemical and Pharmacological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
palmitoleic acid, trans-palmitoleic acid, sea buckthorn oil, lovastatin, HepG2 cells, triglyceride accumulation, cholesterol, HMGCR, HMGR, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, lipid metabolism, insulin secretion
MeSH terms
Cholesterol, Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated, Fatty Liver, Humans, Hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA Reductases, Lovastatin, Plant Oils, Triglycerides, Hippophae, Lipid Metabolism, Hep G2 Cells, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative study of palmitoleic acid, sea buckthorn oil, and lovastatin in hepatocellular steatosis model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-026-37006-y
The paper
Szustak, M., Pichlak, M., Korkus, E., Kamińska, D., Koziołkiewicz, M., Dąbrowski, G., Czaplicki, S., Konopka, I., & Gendaszewska-Darmach, E. (2026). Comparative study of palmitoleic acid, sea buckthorn oil, and lovastatin in hepatocellular steatosis model. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37006-y