Copy number variants (CNVs) interfere with human accelerated regions (HARs) in neurodevelopmental disorders: a large-scale cohort study
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) represent a heterogeneous group of conditions affecting the central nervous system, the etiology of which involves a wide range of factors, including genetic contributors. A proportion of this genetic component is mediated by copy number variations (CNVs) - deletions and duplications of genomic segments that are associated with a broad spectrum of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. In recent years, there has also been growing interest in studying Human Accelerated Regions (HARs) in relation to these disorders. HARs are highly conserved genomic elements across mammals that have accumulated human-specific sequence changes. These regions are thought to contribute both to the evolution of higher cognitive functions in humans and, paradoxically, to an increased susceptibility to NDDs. Thus, both HARs and CNVs are expected to play key roles in the genetic architecture and pathogenesis of NDDs. However, despite active research on HARs and CNVs separately, integrative studies examining copy-number–driven disruptions specifically within HARs in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders have been extremely limited. This is the first study to assess the contribution of CNVs affecting HARs in 821 children with NDDs. Our bioinformatic evaluation of CNV profiles in this clinical cohort demonstrated that HARs are indeed susceptible to structural alterations in the form of deletions and duplications, supporting the notion that CNVs have shaped the evolution of these regions. Our findings further indicate that HARs, overall, are less frequently affected by duplications compared to other genomic regions. We identified three recurrent HAR loci most strongly associated with neurodevelopmental impairment: HAR_Merge50-02702, HAR_Merge50-02080, and HAR_Merge50-02689. Additionally, we found that HARs disrupted by CNVs form coordinated functional clusters corresponding to genomic regions that harbor extremely rare or entirely absent CNVs in the general population (e.g., HARs associated with RBFOX1, DOC2B, ZMYND11, AFF2, OPHN1 ). These same genes exhibit a high haploinsufficiency index (HI = 3) according to ClinGen, highlighting their dosage sensitivity. Analysis of the most frequently affected HARs confirmed that their associated genes are significantly enriched for core NDD phenotypes. The absence of a direct correlation with genomic instability suggests that HARs represent functionally vulnerable elements and that compensatory mechanisms may restrict the accumulation of additional structural damage in these regions. Taken together, our study reinforces the importance of HARs in the evolution and functioning of the human central nervous system and provides new evidence supporting the functional relevance of HAR-associated disruptions in neurodevelopmental disorders. We anticipate that future research will further elucidate the complex regulatory processes within the genome and help identify specific HAR regions that may be informative for diagnostic purposes and the development of targeted therapeutic approaches.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Herculano-Houzel, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201895109 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Brunetti-Pierri, N., Berg, J. S., Scaglia, F., Belmont, J., Bacino, C. A., Sahoo, T., Lalani, S. R., Graham, B., Lee, B., Shinawi, M., et al. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.279 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain
Won, H., de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Stein, J. L., Parikshak, N. N., Huang, J., Opland, C. K., Gandal, M. J., Sutton, G. J., Hormozdiari, F., Lu, D., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19847 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
The role of de novo mutations in the genetics of autism spectrum disorders
Ronemus, M., Iossifov, I., Levy, D., & Wigler, M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3585 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
De novo mutations in regulatory elements in neurodevelopmental disorders
Short, P. J., McRae, J. F., Gallone, G., Sifrim, A., Won, H., Geschwind, D. H., Wright, C. F., Firth, H. V., FitzPatrick, D. R., Barrett, J. C., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25983 · Cited by 274 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Copy number variations (CNVs) — deletions and duplications of genomic segments — play a particularly important role in the genetic architecture of NDDs and are associated with a broad spectrum of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric phenotypes [40,41,43].”
Comparative transcriptomics reveals human-specific cortical features
Jorstad, N. L., Song, J. H. T., Exposito-Alonso, D., Suresh, H., Castro-Pacheco, N., Krienen, F. M., Yanny, A. M., Close, J., Gelfand, E., Long, B., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ade9516 · Cited by 208 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Importantly, enhancer activity of certain HARs differs markedly from that of chimpanzee orthologs [16,24 – 26] with some HARs showing substantially increased activity in humans [15], suggesting that they may have contributed to the emergence of human-specific brain development.”
Function and Regulation of AUTS2, a Gene Implicated in Autism and Human Evolution
Oksenberg, N., Stevison, L., Wall, J. D., & Ahituv, N. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003221 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Wohlfart, S., Hammersen, J., & Schneider, H. (2016) · Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/jhg.2016.75 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Caporale, A. L., Cinalli, A. R., Rubinstein, M., & Franchini, L. F. (2024) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msae186 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, many HARs act as enhancers during embryonic neurodevelopment [20,21], and in brain structures that exhibit human-specific morphological features [22,23].”
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Iuditskaia, M. E., Semina, E. V., Pankratova, E. D., Kurinnaia, O. S., Guldan, E. V., Abasov, E. H., Iourov, I. Y., & Chaika, Y. A.
- Affiliations
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU)
- Mental Health Research Center of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Iourov, Ivan Y.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2026-10-23
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7117575293
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Keywords
- copy number variation, human accelerated regions, neurodevelopmental disorders, structural variants, gene dosage sensitivity, haploinsufficiency, RBFOX1, DOC2B, ZMYND11, OPHN1, compensatory mechanisms, genomic instability, rare variants, neuropsychiatric phenotypes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review