Cited by 584Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain

Open access
Won, Hyejung, de la Torre-Ubieta, Luis, Stein, Jason L., Parikshak, Neelroop N., Huang, Jerry, Opland, Carli K., Gandal, Michael J., Sutton, Gavin J. +7 more·2016·Nature

Abstract

Three-dimensional physical interactions within chromosomes dynamically regulate gene expression in a tissue-specific manner. However, the 3D organization of chromosomes during human brain development and its role in regulating gene networks dysregulated in neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism or schizophrenia, are unknown. Here we generate high-resolution 3D maps of chromatin contacts during human corticogenesis, permitting large-scale annotation of previously uncharacterized regulatory relationships relevant to the evolution of human cognition and disease. Our analyses identify hundreds of genes that physically interact with enhancers gained on the human lineage, many of which are under purifying selection and associated with human cognitive function. We integrate chromatin contacts with non-coding variants identified in schizophrenia genome-wide association studies (GWAS), highlighting multiple candidate schizophrenia risk genes and pathways, including transcription factors involved in neurogenesis, and cholinergic signalling molecules, several of which are supported by independent expression quantitative trait loci and gene expression analyses. Genome editing in human neural progenitors suggests that one of these distal schizophrenia GWAS loci regulates FOXG1 expression, supporting its potential role as a schizophrenia risk gene. This work provides a framework for understanding the effect of non-coding regulatory elements on human brain development and the evolution of cognition, and highlights novel mechanisms underlying neuropsychiatric disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature19847

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Won, H., de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Stein, J. L., Parikshak, N. N., Huang, J., Opland, C. K., Gandal, M. J., Sutton, G. J., Hormozdiari, F., Lu, D., Lee, C., Eskin, E., Voineagu, I., Ernst, J., & Geschwind, D. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Geschwind, Daniel H.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-10
Volume
538
Issue
7626
Pages
523-527
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2534005127
Cited by
584
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 3
FWCI
34.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1254200, CAREER)
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • National Institutes of Health (TG2-01169, 5r01mh094714-04, AI028697)
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington (5P30AI028697, AI028697)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1062510)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K99MH102357, U01MH103339, R01-MH094714, F30MH099886, R01MH110927, R01MH100027, R01MH101782, U01MH105991, R01MH060233, R00MH102357, T32MH073526, R37MH060233)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI028697)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES022282, R01ES024995)
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of California Los Angeles (AI028697)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
chromosome conformation, 3D genome organization, human brain development, cortical development, enhancer-promoter interactions, non-coding variants, schizophrenia risk genes, autism spectrum disorder, neurodevelopmental disorders, FOXG1, purifying selection, human cognitive evolution, neural progenitor cells, Hi-C, gene regulatory networks
MeSH terms
Brain, Chromatin, Chromosomes, Human, Cognition, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Organ Specificity, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Schizophrenia, Reproducibility of Results, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Epigenesis, Genetic, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Genome-Wide Association Study, Neurogenesis, Neural Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review