Cited by 63Computational Drug Discovery MethodsPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Machine learning-based quantitative prediction of drug exposure in drug-drug interactions using drug label information

Open access
Jang, Ha Young, Song, Jihyeon, Kim, Jae Hyun, Lee, Howard, Kim, In-Wha, Moon, Bongki, Oh, Jung Mi·2022·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Many machine learning techniques provide a simple prediction for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). However, a systematically constructed database with pharmacokinetic (PK) DDI information does not exist, nor is there a machine learning model that numerically predicts PK fold change (FC) with it. Therefore, we propose a PK DDI prediction (PK-DDIP) model for quantitative DDI prediction with high accuracy, while constructing a highly reliable PK-DDI database. Reliable information of 3,627 PK DDIs was constructed from 3,587 drugs using 38,711 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels. This PK-DDIP model predicted the FC of the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) within ± 0.5959. The prediction proportions within 0.8-1.25-fold, 0.67-1.5-fold, and 0.5-2-fold of the AUC were 75.77, 86.68, and 94.76%, respectively. Two external validations confirmed good prediction performance for newly updated FDA labels and FC from patients'. This model enables potential DDI evaluation before clinical trials, which will save time and cost.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-022-00639-0

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [29]Huang K Xiao C Hoang T Glass L Sun J Caster: Predicting drug interactions with chemical substructure representation Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 2020 34 702 709
  2. [30]Wang H Lian D Zhang Y Qin L Lin X GoGNN: Graph of graphs neural network for predicting structured entity interactions Proc. Twenty-Ninth Int. Jt. Conf. Artif. Intell. 2021 183 1317 1323
  3. [66]Baxter, K. & Preston, C. L. Stockley’s Drug Interactions, vol. 495 (Pharmaceutical Press, London, 2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jang, H. Y., Song, J., Kim, J. H., Lee, H., Kim, I.-W., Moon, B., & Oh, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Jeonbuk National University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Moon, Bongki
  • Oh, Jung Mi
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2022-07-11
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
88-88
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285008608
Cited by
63
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (19182MFDS407)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
drug-drug interactions, AUC prediction, FDA drug labels, machine learning prediction models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review