Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The health digital twin to tackle cardiovascular disease—a review of an emerging interdisciplinary field

Open access
Coorey, Genevieve, Figtree, Gemma A., Fletcher, David F., Snelson, Victoria J., Vernon, Stephen Thomas, Winlaw, David, Grieve, Stuart M., McEwan, Alistair, Yang, Jean Yee Hwa, Qian, Pierre, O’Brien, Kieran, Orchard, Jessica, Kim, Jinman, Patel, Sanjay, Redfern, Julie·2022·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Potential benefits of precision medicine in cardiovascular disease (CVD) include more accurate phenotyping of individual patients with the same condition or presentation, using multiple clinical, imaging, molecular and other variables to guide diagnosis and treatment. An approach to realising this potential is the digital twin concept, whereby a virtual representation of a patient is constructed and receives real-time updates of a range of data variables in order to predict disease and optimise treatment selection for the real-life patient. We explored the term digital twin, its defining concepts, the challenges as an emerging field, and potentially important applications in CVD. A mapping review was undertaken using a systematic search of peer-reviewed literature. Industry-based participants and patent applications were identified through web-based sources. Searches of Compendex, EMBASE, Medline, ProQuest and Scopus databases yielded 88 papers related to cardiovascular conditions (28%, n = 25), non-cardiovascular conditions (41%, n = 36), and general aspects of the health digital twin (31%, n = 27). Fifteen companies with a commercial interest in health digital twin or simulation modelling had products focused on CVD. The patent search identified 18 applications from 11 applicants, of which 73% were companies and 27% were universities. Three applicants had cardiac-related inventions. For CVD, digital twin research within industry and academia is recent, interdisciplinary, and established globally. Overall, the applications were numerical simulation models, although precursor models exist for the real-time cyber-physical system characteristic of a true digital twin. Implementation challenges include ethical constraints and clinical barriers to the adoption of decision tools derived from artificial intelligence systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-022-00640-7

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Coorey, G., Figtree, G. A., Fletcher, D. F., Snelson, V. J., Vernon, S. T., Winlaw, D., Grieve, S. M., McEwan, A., Yang, J. Y. H., Qian, P., O’Brien, K., Orchard, J., Kim, J., Patel, S., & Redfern, J.
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2022-08-26
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
126-126
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293109418
Cited by
384
References
59
FWCI
14.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The health digital twin to tackle cardiovascular disease—a review of an emerging interdisciplinary field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41746-022-00640-7
The paper
Coorey, G., Figtree, G. A., Fletcher, D. F., Snelson, V. J., Vernon, S. T., Winlaw, D., Grieve, S. M., McEwan, A., Yang, J. Y. H., Qian, P., O’Brien, K., Orchard, J., Kim, J., Patel, S., & Redfern, J. (2022). The health digital twin to tackle cardiovascular disease—a review of an emerging interdisciplinary field. npj Digital Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00640-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.