Cited by 62Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Machine learning for accurate estimation of fetal gestational age based on ultrasound images

Open access
Lee, Lok Hin, Bradburn, Elizabeth, Craik, Rachel, Yaqub, Mohammad, Norris, Shane A., Ismail, Leila Cheikh, Ohuma, Eric O., Barros, Fernando C. +14 more·2023·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Accurate estimation of gestational age is an essential component of good obstetric care and informs clinical decision-making throughout pregnancy. As the date of the last menstrual period is often unknown or uncertain, ultrasound measurement of fetal size is currently the best method for estimating gestational age. The calculation assumes an average fetal size at each gestational age. The method is accurate in the first trimester, but less so in the second and third trimesters as growth deviates from the average and variation in fetal size increases. Consequently, fetal ultrasound late in pregnancy has a wide margin of error of at least ±2 weeks' gestation. Here, we utilise state-of-the-art machine learning methods to estimate gestational age using only image analysis of standard ultrasound planes, without any measurement information. The machine learning model is based on ultrasound images from two independent datasets: one for training and internal validation, and another for external validation. During validation, the model was blinded to the ground truth of gestational age (based on a reliable last menstrual period date and confirmatory first-trimester fetal crown rump length). We show that this approach compensates for increases in size variation and is even accurate in cases of intrauterine growth restriction. Our best machine-learning based model estimates gestational age with a mean absolute error of 3.0 (95% CI, 2.9-3.2) and 4.3 (95% CI, 4.1-4.5) days in the second and third trimesters, respectively, which outperforms current ultrasound-based clinical biometry at these gestational ages. Our method for dating the pregnancy in the second and third trimesters is, therefore, more accurate than published methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-023-00774-2

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Gao, Y. et al. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 3246–3254 (2021).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, L. H., Bradburn, E., Craik, R., Yaqub, M., Norris, S. A., Ismail, L. C., Ohuma, E. O., Barros, F. C., Lambert, A., Carvalho, M., Jaffer, Y. A., Gravett, M., Purwar, M., Wu, Q., Bertino, E., Munim, S., Min, A. M., Bhutta, Z., Villar, J., Kennedy, S. H., Noble, J. A., & Papageorghiou, A. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Intelligent Ultrasound Limited (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • University of Sharjah (AE)
  • Universidade Católica de Pelotas (BR)
  • Aga Khan University Nairobi (KE)
  • Ministry of Health (OM)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
  • Mahidol University (TH)
Corresponding author
Papageorghiou, Aris T.
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2023-03-09
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
36-36
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323807075
Cited by
59
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-000368)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
gestational age estimation, prenatal ultrasound, machine learning, second trimester, third trimester, fetal growth restriction, fetal biometry, image analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review