Cited by 12Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Holistic AI analysis of hybrid cardiac perfusion images for mortality prediction

Open access
Marcinkiewicz, Anna M., Zhang, Wenhao, Shanbhag, Aakash, Miller, Robert J. H., Lemley, Mark, Ramirez, Giselle, Buchwald, Mikolaj, Killekar, Aditya +11 more·2025·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Low-dose computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) scans are used in hybrid myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for attenuation correction and coronary calcium scoring, and contain additional anatomic and pathologic information not utilized in clinical assessment. We seek to uncover the full potential of these scans utilizing a holistic artificial intelligence (AI) approach. A multi-structure model segmented 33 structures and quantified 15 radiomics features in each organ in 10,480 patients from 4 sites. Coronary calcium and epicardial fat measures were obtained from separate AI models. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) for all-cause mortality prediction of the model utilizing MPI, CT, stress test, and clinical features was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [0.74-0.87]), which was higher than for coronary calcium (0.64 [0.57-0.71]) or perfusion (0.62 [0.55-0.70]), with p < 0.001 for both. A comprehensive multimodality approach can significantly improve mortality prediction compared to MPI information alone in patients undergoing hybrid MPI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-025-01526-0

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radiomics-based approaches sought to refine risk stratification by extracting higher-dimensional imaging features beyond the Agatston score, including plaque texture, spatial distribution, density characteristics and lesion morphology.

    “Radiomics-based approaches sought to further refine risk stratification by extracting higher-dimensional imaging features beyond the Agatston score, including plaque texture, spatial distribution, density characteristics and lesion morphology.252635–37”

    From Prognostication and clinical opportunities with AI for coronary artery calcium: a scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Methods section reports extracting first-order statistical and 3D shape radiomic features from multiple structures, and the Results compare the resulting model with coronary calcium scoring for mortality prediction (pages not provided). The paper does not identify plaque texture, spatial distribution, density characteristics, or lesion morphology as features it extracted; its reported density measure concerns epicardial adipose tissue, not plaque. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [42]Witten, I. H., Frank, E., Hall, M. A., Pal, C. J. & Data, M. in Data mining. 403-413 (Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
  2. [44]Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. Consistent feature attribution for tree ensembles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06060 (2017). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcinkiewicz, A. M., Zhang, W., Shanbhag, A., Miller, R. J. H., Lemley, M., Ramirez, G., Buchwald, M., Killekar, A., Kavanagh, P. B., Feher, A., Miller, E. J., Einstein, A. J., Ruddy, T. D., Liang, J. X., Builoff, V., Ouyang, D., Berman, D. S., Dey, D., & Slomka, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Ottawa Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Slomka, Piotr J.
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-03-13
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
158-158
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408391722
Cited by
12
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL089765)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
all-cause mortality prediction, radiomics, coronary artery calcium, epicardial adipose tissue, coronary artery disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review