Cited by 9Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceElectronic Health Records Systems

Prospective real-world implementation of deep learning systems in healthcare: a systematic review guided by implementation science

Open access
Tseng, Rachel Marjorie Wei Wen, Ong, Li Cheng, Goh, Jocelyn Hui Lin, Chen, Yibing, Chen, Tina, Lum, Elaine, Tham, Yih-Chung·2026·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) applications in healthcare are expanding beyond proof-of-concept studies. Yet, the extent of its real-world implementation and impact on patient care and clinical workflows remains unclear due to the limited prospective real-world findings. Understanding how DL tools perform in real clinical environments is critical for guiding successful and sustainable deployment. Using a layered methodology with established implementation science frameworks, this systematic review aimed to systematically map the implementation strategies and outcomes of prospective DL implementation studies, proposing recommendations based on identified gaps of relevant studies to serve as a guide for the future implementation of DL systems. 20 articles were included: 3 from radiology, 1 from otolaryngology, 3 from dermatology, and 13 from ophthalmology. All studies assessed clinical outcomes, demonstrating the effectiveness and feasibility of integrating DL systems into existing clinical workflows. Adoption and appropriateness were the most frequently evaluated implementation outcomes; only one study evaluated implementation costs, and none evaluated sustainability. Stakeholder acceptability was only evaluated in 8 studies. Given the paucity of real-world DL implementation research, continued research into the clinical deployment of DL systems using hybrid effectiveness-implementation study designs as a framework is essential to facilitate its seamless and effective adoption into clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-026-02358-2

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Artificial intelligence is the most frequently implemented deep learning application in prospective real-world studies.

    “Multiple artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed and validated for DR5–8 screening and it is the most frequently implemented deep learning application in prospective real-world studies9.”

    From Referral uptake after diabetic retinopathy screening with artificial intelligence-assisted care pathways: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results table (page not available) includes several prospective real-world studies of deep-learning systems for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening. The cited sentence’s “it” refers to DR screening, not artificial intelligence generally. The passages establish that DR screening is a recurring application, but do not establish that it is the most frequently implemented application. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]Takahashi, T., Nozaki, K., Gonda, T., Mameno, T. & Ikebe, K. Deep learning-based detection of dental prostheses and restorations. Sci. Rep. 11, 1960 (2021). 33479303 PMC7820223
  2. [16]Liu, X. et al. Evaluation of an OCT-AI-based telemedicine platform for retinal disease screening and referral in a primary care setting. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 11, 4 (2022). 35254422 PMC8914565
  3. [17]Liu, B. et al. Assisting scalable diagnosis automatically via CT images in the combat against COVID-19. Sci. Rep. 11, 4145 (2021). 33603047 PMC7892869
  4. [26]Liu, R. et al. Application of artificial intelligence-based dual-modality analysis combining fundus photography and optical coherence tomography in diabetic retinopathy screening in a community hospital. Biomed. Eng. Online 21, 47 (2022). 35859144 PMC9301845
  5. [30]Scheetz, J. et al. Real-world artificial intelligence-based opportunistic screening for diabetic retinopathy in endocrinology and indigenous healthcare settings in Australia. Sci. Rep. 11, 15808 (2021). 34349130 PMC8339059
  6. [46]Li, R. et al. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of traditional and telemedicine combined population-based age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy screening in rural and urban China. Lancet Reg. Health West Pac. 23, 100435 (2022). 35355615 PMC8958534

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tseng, R. M. W. W., Ong, L. C., Goh, J. H. L., Chen, Y., Chen, T., Lum, E., & Tham, Y.-C.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • SingHealth (SG)
Corresponding author
Tham, Yih-Chung
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-01-23
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
172-172
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7125529244
Cited by
9
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 9
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Medical Research Council of Singapore (NMRC/MOH/HCSAINV21nov-0001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
deep learning, clinical implementation, implementation science, field deployment, clinical workflow, implementation outcomes, technology adoption, stakeholder acceptance, implementation costs, sustainability, radiology, ophthalmology, dermatology, otolaryngology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review