Institutional navigation for polycentric sustainability governance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Within polycentric governance systems, actors strategically navigate to join, create, resist, or adapt existing institutions, which Lubell and Morrison call institutional navigation.
“Within polycentric governance systems, actors strategically navigate to join, create, resist, or adapt existing institutions, what Lubell and Morrison (2021) call institutional navigation.”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Lubell and Morrison (2021)
International conservation focuses on settler states' priorities and scientific knowledge, often leading to Indigenous communities' fatigue, especially associated with continuous demands for research and advocacy.
“The case illustrates how international conservation focuses on settler states' priorities and scientific knowledge often leading to Indigenous communities' fatigue, especially associated with continuous demands for research and advocacy (see Lubell and Morrison, 2021).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Lubell and Morrison, 2021
Observed power asymmetries and cross-level local to international conflicts threatened subsistence rights and generated research and advocacy fatigue for Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities in the USA and Russia.
“However, observed power asymmetries and cross-level local to international conflicts threatened subsistence rights and generated research and advocacy fatigue for Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities in the USA and Russia.”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Lubell and Morrison, 2021
North Slope Borough leaders, historically whaling captains or their partners themselves, were able to leverage their position and networks, staff a wildlife department, and provide resources to support the AEWC.
“North Slope Borough leaders, historically whaling captains or their partners themselves, were able to leverage their position and networks, staff a wildlife department, and provide resources to support the AEWCsocial capital (and simply resources) were critical (see similar discussion in Lubell and Morrison, 2021).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Lubell and Morrison, 2021
Cites
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656 · see citing works
Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1810141115 · Cited by 3,139 · see citing works
Political Trust and Trustworthiness
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475 · Cited by 2,190 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lubell, M., & Morrison, T. H.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lubell, Mark
- Venue
- Nature Sustainability
- Published
- 2021-04-22
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 664-671
- ISSN
- 2398-9629 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3157755135
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Sustainability (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1541056, 1639145)
- National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (DBI‐1639145)
- Australian Research Council
- Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Australian Research Council (140100020)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- polycentric governance, sustainability governance, adaptive capacity, collective welfare, policy actors, environmental politics, San Francisco Bay, Great Barrier Reef, institutional complexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review