Cited by 119Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceCoastal and Marine ManagementPublic Policy and Administration Research

Institutional navigation for polycentric sustainability governance

Lubell, Mark, Morrison, Tiffany H.·2021·Nature Sustainability

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41893-021-00707-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within polycentric governance systems, actors strategically navigate to join, create, resist, or adapt existing institutions, which Lubell and Morrison call institutional navigation.

    “Within polycentric governance systems, actors strategically navigate to join, create, resist, or adapt existing institutions, what Lubell and Morrison (2021) call institutional navigation.”
  • International conservation focuses on settler states' priorities and scientific knowledge, often leading to Indigenous communities' fatigue, especially associated with continuous demands for research and advocacy.

    “The case illustrates how international conservation focuses on settler states' priorities and scientific knowledge often leading to Indigenous communities' fatigue, especially associated with continuous demands for research and advocacy (see Lubell and Morrison, 2021).”
  • Observed power asymmetries and cross-level local to international conflicts threatened subsistence rights and generated research and advocacy fatigue for Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities in the USA and Russia.

    “However, observed power asymmetries and cross-level local to international conflicts threatened subsistence rights and generated research and advocacy fatigue for Chukchi, Iñupiat, Saint Lawrence Island Yupik, and Siberian Yupik communities in the USA and Russia.”
  • North Slope Borough leaders, historically whaling captains or their partners themselves, were able to leverage their position and networks, staff a wildlife department, and provide resources to support the AEWC.

    “North Slope Borough leaders, historically whaling captains or their partners themselves, were able to leverage their position and networks, staff a wildlife department, and provide resources to support the AEWCsocial capital (and simply resources) were critical (see similar discussion in Lubell and Morrison, 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lubell, M., & Morrison, T. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies (AU)
Corresponding author
Lubell, Mark
Venue
Nature Sustainability
Published
2021-04-22
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
664-671
ISSN
2398-9629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157755135
Cited by
119
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Sustainability (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1541056, 1639145)
  • National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (DBI‐1639145)
  • Australian Research Council
  • Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Australian Research Council (140100020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
polycentric governance, sustainability governance, adaptive capacity, collective welfare, policy actors, environmental politics, San Francisco Bay, Great Barrier Reef, institutional complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review