The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making quantitative sense of electromicrobial production
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review
Naik, S. N., Goud, V. V., Rout, P. K., & Dalai, A. K. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003 · Cited by 3,264
Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent
Sander, R. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-4399-2015 · Cited by 2,873
Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review
Götz, M., Lefebvre, J., Mörs, F., McDaniel Koch, A., Graf, F., Bajohr, S., Reimert, R., & Kolb, T. (2016) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066 · Cited by 2,573
Buttler, A., & Spliethoff, H. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 · Cited by 2,510
Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study
Schmidt, O., Gambhir, A., Staffell, I., Hawkes, A., Nelson, J., & Few, S. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.045 · Cited by 2,067
Microbial electrosynthesis — revisiting the electrical route for microbial production
Rabaey, K., & Rozendal, R. A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2422 · Cited by 1,651
Comparing Photosynthetic and Photovoltaic Efficiencies and Recognizing the Potential for Improvement
Blankenship, R. E., Tiede, D. M., Barber, J., Brudvig, G. W., Fleming, G., Ghirardi, M., Gunner, M. R., Junge, W., Kramer, D. M., Melis, A., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200165 · Cited by 1,638
General Techno-Economic Analysis of CO 2 Electrolysis Systems
Jouny, M., Luc, W., & Jiao, F. (2018) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03514 · Cited by 1,628
Álvarez, A., Bansode, A., Urakawa, A., Bavykina, A. V., Wezendonk, T. A., Makkee, M., Gascon, J., & Kapteijn, F. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00816 · Cited by 1,600
Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: An overview
Garcia-Ochoa, F., & Gomez, E. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.10.006 · Cited by 1,504
Cited by
Enzymatic Conversion of CO2: From Natural to Artificial Utilization
Bierbaumer, S., Nattermann, M., Schulz, L., Zschoche, R., Erb, T. J., Winkler, C. K., Tinzl, M., & Glueck, S. M. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00581 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Claassens, N. J., Cotton, C. A. R., Kopljar, D., & Bar-Even, A.
- Venue
- Nature Catalysis
- Published
- 2019-05-13
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 437-447
- ISSN
- 2520-1158 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2946326120
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 11.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making quantitative sense of electromicrobial production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41929-019-0272-0
- The paper
- Claassens, N. J., Cotton, C. A. R., Kopljar, D., & Bar-Even, A. (2019). Making quantitative sense of electromicrobial production. Nature Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0272-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
