Cited by 39Sexual Differentiation and DisordersEstrogen and related hormone effectsHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Deletion of neural estrogen receptor alpha induces sex differential effects on reproductive behavior in mice

Open access
Trouillet, Anne-Charlotte, Ducroq, Suzanne, Naulé, Lydie, Capela, Daphné, Parmentier, Caroline, Radovick, Sally, Hardin-Pouzet, Hélène, Mhaouty-Kodja, Sakina·2022·Communications Biology

Abstract

Estrogen receptor (ER) α is involved in several estrogen-modulated neural and peripheral functions. To determine its role in the expression of female and male reproductive behavior, a mouse line lacking the ERα in the nervous system was generated. Mutant females did not exhibit sexual behavior despite normal olfactory preference, and had a reduced number of progesterone receptor-immunoreactive neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus. Mutant males displayed a moderately impaired sexual behavior and unaffected fertility, despite evidences of altered organization of sexually dimorphic populations in the preoptic area. In comparison, males deleted for both neural ERα and androgen receptor (AR) displayed greater sexual deficiencies. Thus, these data highlight a predominant role for neural ERα in females and a complementary role with the AR in males in the regulation of sexual behavior, and provide a solid background for future analyses of neuronal versus glial implication of these signaling pathways in both sexes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42003-022-03324-w

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impairments in male copulatory behavior following play deprivation were close to the magnitude seen in other studies in which male copulatory behavior is altered by more substantial pharmacological or genetic manipulations.

    “Remarkably, these impairments were close to the magnitude seen in other studies in which male copulatory behavior is altered by more substantial pharmacological or genetic manipulations”

    From Social play experience in juvenile rats is indispensable for appropriate socio-sexual behavior in adulthood in males but not females (2023) · cites this paper as Trouillet et al., 2022

    The Results section, under “Double neural AR and ERα knockout severely impaired male sexual behavior in mice” (page unavailable), reports substantial changes in male mating behavior after a genetic manipulation. The paper does not examine play deprivation or compare its effects with the knockout effects, so it cannot establish the claimed similarity in magnitude. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The reduction in the percentage of animals successfully ejaculating was similar to that seen in males in which both the androgen receptor and estrogen receptor alpha were genetically deleted.

    “the reduction in the percentage of animals which successfully ejaculated we observed was similar to that seen in males in which both the androgen receptor and estrogen receptor alpha were genetically deleted (Trouillet et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [43]Paxinos, G. & Franklin, K. B. J. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 2nd edn (Academic Press, 2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trouillet, A.-C., Ducroq, S., Naulé, L., Capela, D., Parmentier, C., Radovick, S., Hardin-Pouzet, H., & Mhaouty-Kodja, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2022-04-20
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
383-383
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224210277
Cited by
39
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-CESA-006, ANR-programme blanc SVSE 7-2012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
estrogen receptor alpha, sexual behavior, sex differences, androgen receptor, ventromedial hypothalamus, preoptic area, odor preference, fertility
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Hypothalamus, Male, Neurons, Preoptic Area, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review