Cited by 6SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Broadly potent spike-specific human monoclonal antibodies inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sub-lineages

Open access
Walker, Melanie R., Underwood, Alexander, Björnsson, Kasper H., Raghavan, Sai Sundar Rajan, Bassi, Maria R., Binderup, Alekxander, Pham, Long V., Ramirez, Santseharay +10 more·2024·Communications Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract The continuous emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern with mutated spike receptor binding domains has rendered many therapeutic mAbs ineffective. To date, there are no clinically authorized therapeutic antibodies effective against the predominant circulating sub-lineages BQ and XBB. Here, we report the isolation of broad and potent neutralizing HuMabs from a Danish healthcare worker infected with SARS-CoV-2 early in the pandemic. These HuMabs include a novel and genetically unique non-RBD-specific HuMab (K501SP6) which can neutralize Omicron sub-lineages BQ and XBB, and an RBD-specific HuMab (K501SP3) with high potency towards earlier circulating variants but was escaped by Omicron sub-lineages BA.5, BQ and XBB through F486 and E484 substitutions. Characterizing SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific HuMabs, including broadly reactive non-RBD-specific HuMabs, can give insight into the immune mechanisms involved in neutralization and immune evasion, which can be a valuable addition to already existing SARS-CoV-2 therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42003-024-06951-7

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Walker, M. R., Underwood, A., Björnsson, K. H., Raghavan, S. S. R., Bassi, M. R., Binderup, A., Pham, L. V., Ramirez, S., Pinholt, M., Dagil, R., Knudsen, A. S., Idorn, M., Soegaard, M., Wang, K., Ward, A. B., Salanti, A., Bukh, J., & Barfod, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Barfod, Lea
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2024-10-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1239-1239
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403081168
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF170C0026778)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, Omicron subvariants, BA.2.86, JN.1, human monoclonal antibodies, neutralizing antibodies, spike protein, receptor binding domain, immune evasion, antibody escape mutations, therapeutic antibodies
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibodies, Viral, Epitopes, Humans, Neutralization Tests, Immune Evasion, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review