Cited by 16Neural Networks and Reservoir ComputingAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingNeural Networks and Applications

Learning reservoir dynamics with temporal self-modulation

Open access
Sakemi, Yusuke, Nobukawa, Sou, Matsuki, Toshitaka, Morie, Takashi, Aihara, Kazuyuki·2024·Communications Physics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Reservoir computing (RC) can efficiently process time-series data by mapping the input signal into a high-dimensional space via randomly connected recurrent neural networks (RNNs), which are referred to as a reservoir. The high-dimensional representation of time-series data in the reservoir simplifies subsequent learning tasks. Although this simple architecture allows fast learning and facile physical implementation, the learning performance is inferior to that of other state-of-the-art RNN models. In this study, to improve the learning ability of RC, we propose self-modulated RC (SM-RC) that extends RC by adding a self-modulation mechanism. SM-RC can perform attention tasks where input information is retained or discarded depending on the input signal. We find that a chaotic state can emerge as a result of learning in SM-RC. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SM-RC outperforms RC in NARMA and Lorenz model tasks. Because the SM-RC architecture only requires two additional gates, it is physically implementable as RC, thereby providing a direction for realizing edge artificial intelligence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42005-023-01500-w

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sakemi, Y., Nobukawa, S., Matsuki, T., Morie, T., & Aihara, K.
Affiliations
  • International Research Center for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
  • National Defense Academy of Japan (JP)
  • Kyushu Institute of Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Sakemi, Yusuke
Venue
Communications Physics
Published
2024-01-12
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
2399-3650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390817923
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJPR22C5, JPMJMS2021)
  • Secom Science and Technology Foundation
  • MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP20H05921)
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP23dm0307009)
  • Institute of AI and Beyond of UTokyo the International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN) at The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
reservoir computing, self-modulation, recurrent neural networks, attention mechanism, chaotic dynamics, time series forecasting, Lorenz system, edge AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review