Cited by 351Neural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Neuromodulation of Attention

Open access
Thiele, Alexander, Bellgrove, Mark A.·2018·Neuron

Abstract

Attention is critical to high-level cognition and attention deficits are a hallmark of neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although years of research indicates that distinct neuromodulators influence attentional control, a mechanistic account that traverses levels of analysis (cells, circuits, behavior) is missing. However, such an account is critical to guide the development of next-generation pharmacotherapies aimed at forestalling or remediating the global burden associated with disorders of attention. Here, we summarize current neuroscientific understanding of how attention affects single neurons and networks of neurons. We then review key results that have informed our understanding of how neuromodulation shapes these neuron and network properties and thereby enables the appropriate allocation of attention to relevant external or internal events. Finally, we highlight areas where we believe hypotheses can be formulated and tackled experimentally in the near future, thereby critically increasing our mechanistic understanding of how attention is implemented at the cellular and network levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.008

Cites

216 of 216 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Working memory serves as the basis of other higher order cognitive processes including recognition memory, which is mediated by mPFC function.

    “Among numerous cognitive domains, working memory serves as the basis of other higher order cognitive processes including but not limited to recognition memory (27–29), which is mediated by mPFC function.”

    From Effects of Lisdexamfetamine, a Prodrug of D-Amphetamine, on Locomotion, Spatial Cognitive Processing and Neurochemical Profiles in Rats: A Comparison With Immediate-Release Amphetamine (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Main Text describes working memory as holding goals that guide attention, supporting a relationship between working memory and another cognitive process. It does not say that working memory underlies recognition memory. The passages on prefrontal function concern working memory or attentional control, not mPFC mediation of recognition memory (pages unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In network models of local cortical circuits, state-dependent increases in inhibitory and excitatory drive can cause convergence of competing unstable patterns of activity to a single stable representation.

    “In network models of local cortical circuits, state-dependent increases in inhibitory and excitatory drive can cause convergence of competing, unstable patterns of activity to a single, stable representation221”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [221]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thiele, A., & Bellgrove, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Thiele, Alexander
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
769-785
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2788231085
Cited by
350
References
215
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 13
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (093104)
  • MRC (MR/P013031/1)
  • NC3R (NC/P000940/1)
  • Australian Research Council (FT130101488, DP150100986)
  • Newcastle University
  • Monash University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
attention, neuromodulation, attention deficits, single neurons, neural circuits, attentional control, attention allocation
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Animals, Attention, Biogenic Amines, Brain, Dopamine, Humans, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Norepinephrine, Serotonin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review