The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Foundations of complexity economics
Open accessAbstract
Conventional, neoclassical economics assumes perfectly rational agents (firms, consumers, investors) who face well-defined problems and arrive at optimal behaviour consistent with — in equilibrium with — the overall outcome caused by this behaviour. This rational, equilibrium system produces an elegant economics, but is restrictive and often unrealistic. Complexity economics relaxes these assumptions. It assumes that agents differ, that they have imperfect information about other agents and must, therefore, try to make sense of the situation they face. Agents explore, react and constantly change their actions and strategies in response to the outcome they mutually create. The resulting outcome may not be in equilibrium and may display patterns and emergent phenomena not visible to equilibrium analysis. The economy becomes something not given and existing but constantly forming from a developing set of actions, strategies and beliefs — something not mechanistic, static, timeless and perfect but organic, always creating itself, alive and full of messy vitality. Complexity economics relaxes the assumptions of neoclassical economics to assume that agents differ, that they have imperfect information about other agents and they must, therefore, try to make sense of the situation they face. This Perspective sketches the ideas of complexity economics and describes how it links to complexity science more broadly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Increasing Returns and Economic Geography
Krugman, P. (1991) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261763 · Cited by 12,231
Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events
Arthur, W. B. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234208 · Cited by 7,489
Self-citationThe general theory of employment
Keynes, J. M. (1937) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1882087 · Cited by 5,173
Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy
Lucas, R. E. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913837 · Cited by 5,014
Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy
Arthur, W. (2026) · doi:10.3998/mpub.10029 · Cited by 4,547
Self-citationShackle, G. L. S., & Simon, H. A. (1959) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2228083 · Cited by 3,558
Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues
Cont, R. (2001) · Quantitative Finance · doi:10.1080/713665670 · Cited by 3,486
The building blocks of economic complexity
Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900943106 · Cited by 3,372
A simple model of global cascades on random networks
Watts, D. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.082090499 · Cited by 2,673
Metadata
- Authors
- Arthur, W. B.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Physics
- Published
- 2021-01-29
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 136-145
- ISSN
- 2522-5820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3126994326
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foundations of complexity economics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s42254-020-00273-3
- The paper
- Arthur, W. B. (2021). Foundations of complexity economics. Nature Reviews Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00273-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.