Cited by 126Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Generalized radiograph representation learning via cross-supervision between images and free-text radiology reports

Open access
Zhou, Hong-Yu, Chen, Xiaoyu, Zhang, Yinghao, Luo, Ruibang, Wang, Liansheng, Yu, Yizhou·2022·Nature Machine Intelligence

Published version of a preprint

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-021-00425-9

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Paired image-text co-learning has been used to learn from chest X-rays and their associated text reports, outperforming other self-supervised and fully supervised methods.

    “This approach for paired image-text co-learning has been used recently to learn from chest X-rays and their associated text reports, outperforming other self-supervised and fully supervised methods 108”

    From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [108]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Zhou, Z. W., Sodha, V., Pang, J. X., Gotway, M. B. & Liang, J. M. Model genesis. Med. Image Anal. 67, 101840 (2021).
  2. Ba, J. L., Kiros, J. R. & Hinton, G. E. Layer normalization. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, H.-Y., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Luo, R., Wang, L., & Yu, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Liansheng
  • Yu, Yizhou
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2022-01-20
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
32-40
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3213233983
Cited by
126
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 9
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20720210121, 20720190012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
radiology reports, weakly supervised learning, vision transformer, transfer learning, self-supervised learning, X-ray images, limited supervision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review