Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 851

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular contrastive learning of representations via graph neural networks

Open access
Wang, Yuyang, Wang, Jianren, Cao, Zhonglin, Barati Farimani, Amir·2022·Nature Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Molecular machine learning bears promise for efficient molecular property prediction and drug discovery. However, labelled molecule data can be expensive and time consuming to acquire. Due to the limited labelled data, it is a great challenge for supervised-learning machine learning models to generalize to the giant chemical space. Here we present MolCLR (Molecular Contrastive Learning of Representations via Graph Neural Networks), a self-supervised learning framework that leverages large unlabelled data (~10 million unique molecules). In MolCLR pre-training, we build molecule graphs and develop graph-neural-network encoders to learn differentiable representations. Three molecule graph augmentations are proposed: atom masking, bond deletion and subgraph removal. A contrastive estimator maximizes the agreement of augmentations from the same molecule while minimizing the agreement of different molecules. Experiments show that our contrastive learning framework significantly improves the performance of graph-neural-network encoders on various molecular property benchmarks including both classification and regression tasks. Benefiting from pre-training on the large unlabelled database, MolCLR even achieves state of the art on several challenging benchmarks after fine-tuning. In addition, further investigations demonstrate that MolCLR learns to embed molecules into representations that can distinguish chemically reasonable molecular similarities. Molecular representations are hard to design due to the large size of the chemical space, the amount of potentially important information in a molecular structure and the relatively low number of annotated molecules. Still, the quality of these representations is vital for computational models trying to predict molecular properties. Wang et al. present a contrastive learning approach to provide differentiable representations from unlabelled data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-022-00447-x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 851

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Wang, J., Cao, Z., & Barati Farimani, A.
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2022-03-03
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
279-287
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214868967
Cited by
851
References
67
FWCI
83.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular contrastive learning of representations via graph neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s42256-022-00447-x
The paper
Wang, Y., Wang, J., Cao, Z., & Barati Farimani, A. (2022). Molecular contrastive learning of representations via graph neural networks. Nature Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00447-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.