The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular contrastive learning of representations via graph neural networks
Open accessAbstract
Molecular machine learning bears promise for efficient molecular property prediction and drug discovery. However, labelled molecule data can be expensive and time consuming to acquire. Due to the limited labelled data, it is a great challenge for supervised-learning machine learning models to generalize to the giant chemical space. Here we present MolCLR (Molecular Contrastive Learning of Representations via Graph Neural Networks), a self-supervised learning framework that leverages large unlabelled data (~10 million unique molecules). In MolCLR pre-training, we build molecule graphs and develop graph-neural-network encoders to learn differentiable representations. Three molecule graph augmentations are proposed: atom masking, bond deletion and subgraph removal. A contrastive estimator maximizes the agreement of augmentations from the same molecule while minimizing the agreement of different molecules. Experiments show that our contrastive learning framework significantly improves the performance of graph-neural-network encoders on various molecular property benchmarks including both classification and regression tasks. Benefiting from pre-training on the large unlabelled database, MolCLR even achieves state of the art on several challenging benchmarks after fine-tuning. In addition, further investigations demonstrate that MolCLR learns to embed molecules into representations that can distinguish chemically reasonable molecular similarities. Molecular representations are hard to design due to the large size of the chemical space, the amount of potentially important information in a molecular structure and the relatively low number of annotated molecules. Still, the quality of these representations is vital for computational models trying to predict molecular properties. Wang et al. present a contrastive learning approach to provide differentiable representations from unlabelled data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00975 · Cited by 13,347
A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations
Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05709 · Cited by 10,857
Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints
Rogers, D., & Hahn, M. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100050t · Cited by 7,524
Weininger, D. (1988) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci00057a005 · Cited by 7,436
(2011) · Cited by 6,993
Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Oord, A. V. D., Li, Y., & Vinyals, O. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.03748 · Cited by 6,242
Cited by
Self-supervised learning in medicine and healthcare
Krishnan, R., Rajpurkar, P., & Topol, E. J. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00914-1 · Cited by 605
Large-scale chemical language representations capture molecular structure and properties
Ross, J., Belgodere, B., Chenthamarakshan, V., Padhi, I., Mroueh, Y., & Das, P. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00580-7 · Cited by 590
Leveraging large language models for predictive chemistry
Jablonka, K. M., Schwaller, P., Ortega-Guerrero, A., & Smit, B. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00788-1 · Cited by 378
A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Graph Representation Learning
Ju, W., Fang, Z., Gu, Y., Liu, Z., Long, Q., Qiao, Z., Qin, Y., Shen, J., Sun, F., Xiao, Z., et al. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106207 · Cited by 341
Self-citationAI in drug discovery and its clinical relevance
Qureshi, R., Irfan, M., Gondal, T. M., Khan, S., Wu, J., Hadi, M. U., Heymach, J., Le, X., Yan, H., & Alam, T. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17575 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Wang, J., Cao, Z., & Barati Farimani, A.
- Venue
- Nature Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2022-03-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-287
- ISSN
- 2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4214868967
- Cited by
- 851
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 83.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular contrastive learning of representations via graph neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s42256-022-00447-x
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Wang, J., Cao, Z., & Barati Farimani, A. (2022). Molecular contrastive learning of representations via graph neural networks. Nature Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00447-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.