Cited by 184Advanced Graph Neural NetworksMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsGraph Theory and Algorithms

Multimodal learning with graphs

Open access
Ektefaie, Yasha, Dasoulas, George, Noori, Ayush, Farhat, Maha, Zitnik, Marinka·2023·Nature Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Artificial intelligence for graphs has achieved remarkable success in modeling complex systems, ranging from dynamic networks in biology to interacting particle systems in physics. However, the increasingly heterogeneous graph datasets call for multimodal methods that can combine different inductive biases-the set of assumptions that algorithms use to make predictions for inputs they have not encountered during training. Learning on multimodal datasets presents fundamental challenges because the inductive biases can vary by data modality and graphs might not be explicitly given in the input. To address these challenges, multimodal graph AI methods combine different modalities while leveraging cross-modal dependencies using graphs. Diverse datasets are combined using graphs and fed into sophisticated multimodal architectures, specified as image-intensive, knowledge-grounded and language-intensive models. Using this categorization, we introduce a blueprint for multimodal graph learning, use it to study existing methods and provide guidelines to design new models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-023-00624-6

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The all-in-one multimodal graph learning (MGL) architecture introduced a unified framework that included entity identification, topology construction, information propagation, and representation mixing for joint learning of modalities such as images, language sequences, or biological systems.

    “The “all-in-one” multimodal graph learning (MGL) architecture [67] introduced a unified framework that included entity identification, topology construction, information propagation, and representation mixing for joint learning of modalities such as images, language sequences, or biological systems.”
  • For adapting GNNs into multimodal usage, data points from different modalities are all well-organized in defined graphs, and GNNs can directly learn interactions of intra- and inter-modalities simultaneously.

    “For adapting GNNs into a multimodal usage [67], data points from different modalities are all well-organized in defined graphs, and in contrast to single-modal fusion architecture, GNNs can directly learn the interactions of intra- and inter-modalities simultaneously.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1][1] Kim, J., Kim, T., Kim, S. & Yoo, C. D. Edge-labeling graph neural network for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019). -
  2. [2][2] Zhang, M. & Chen, Y. Link prediction based on graph neural networks. In Bengio, S. et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 31 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2018). -
  3. [3][3] Beani, D. et al. Directional graph networks. In Meila, M. & Zhang, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning , vol. 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , 748-758 (PMLR, 2021). -
  4. [4][4] Bodnar, C. et al. Weisfeiler and lehman go cellular: CW networks. In Thirty-Fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2021). -
  5. [5][5] Alsentzer, E., Finlayson, S. G., Li, M. M. & Zitnik, M. Subgraph neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2020). -
  6. [6][6] Vinyals, O., Bengio, S. & Kudlur, M. Order matters: Sequence to sequence for sets. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2016). -
  7. [7][7] Corso, G., Cavalleri, L., Beaini, D., Liò, P. & Veličković, P. Principal neighbourhood aggregation for graph nets. In Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M. F. & Lin, H. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 33, 13260-13271 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2020). -
  8. [8][8] Defferrard, M., Bresson, X. & Vandergheynst, P. Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. In Lee, D., Sugiyama, M., Luxburg, U., Guyon, I. & Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 29 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2016). -
  9. [9][9] Wu, F. et al. Simplifying graph convolutional networks. In Chaudhuri, K. & Salakhutdinov, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning , vol. 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , 6861-6871 (PMLR, 2019). -
  10. [10][10] Levie, R., Monti, F., Bresson, X. & Bronstein, M. M. Cayleynets: Graph convolutional neural networks with complex rational spectral filters. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 67 , 97-109 (2019). -
  11. [11][11] Veličković, P. et al. Graph attention networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (2018). -
  12. [12][12] Kreuzer, D., Beaini, D., Hamilton, W. L., Létourneau, V. & Tossou, P. Rethinking graph transformers with spectral attention. In Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y., Liang, P. & Vaughan, J. W. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2021). -
  13. [13][13] Ying, C. et al. Do transformers really perform badly for graph representation? In Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y., Liang, P. & Vaughan, J. W. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2021). -
  14. [14][14] Rampasek, L. et al. Recipe for a general, powerful, scalable graph transformer. In Oh, A. H., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D. & Cho, K. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2022). -
  15. [15][15] Hong, D. et al. Graph convolutional networks for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 59 , 5966-5978 (2021). -
  16. [16][16] Lu, Y., Chen, Y., Zhao, D. & Chen, J. Graph-fcn for image semantic segmentation. CoRR (2020). 2001.00335 . -
  17. [17][17] Yao, L., Mao, C. & Luo, Y. Graph convolutional networks for text classification. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference and Ninth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence , AAAI'19/IAAI'19/EAAI'19 (AAAI Press, 2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ektefaie, Y., Dasoulas, G., Noori, A., Farhat, M., & Zitnik, M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2023-04-03
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
340-350
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362579348
Cited by
166
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 13
FWCI
15.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • U.S. Air Force (FA8702‐15‐D‐0001)
  • Harvard Data Science Initiative, Harvard University
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (T32HG002295)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI155765)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
Keywords
graph representation learning, inductive bias, geometric relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review