Cited by 9Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-resolution real-space reconstruction of cryo-EM structures using a neural field network

Open access
Huang, Yue, Zhu, Chengguang, Yang, Xiaokang, Liu, Manhua·2024·Nature Machine Intelligence

Published version of a preprint

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-024-00870-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Smith, M. T. J. & Rubinstein, J. L. Beyond blob-ology. Science 345, 617–619 (2014). · DOI
  2. Renaud, J. P. et al. Cryo-EM in drug discovery: achievements, limitations and prospects. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17, 471–492 (2018). · DOI
  3. Terwilliger, T. C. et al. AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination. Nat. Methods 21, 110–116 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Yang, Z. et al. AlphaFold2 and its applications in the fields of biology and medicine. Sig. Transduct. Target. Ther. 8, 115 (2023). · DOI
  5. Nogales, E. The development of cryo-EM into a mainstream structural biology technique. Nat. Methods 13, 24–27 (2016). · DOI
  6. Cheng, Y. Single-particle cryo-EM at crystallographic resolution. Cell 161, 450–457 (2015). · DOI
  7. Zhou, X. et al. Progressive assembly of multi-domain protein structures from cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2, 265–275 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Zhang, Z. et al. DEMO-EM2: assembling protein complex structures from cryo-EM maps through intertwined chain and domain fitting. Brief. Bioinform. 25, bbae113 (2024). · DOI
  9. Bendory, T., Bartesaghi, A. & Singer, A. Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy: mathematical theory, computational challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Signal Process. Magazine 37, 58–76 (2020). · DOI
  10. Singer, A. & Sigworth, F. J. Computational methods for single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 3, 163–190 (2020). · DOI
  11. Namba, K. & Makino, F. Recent progress and future perspective of electron cryomicroscopy for structural life sciences. Microscopy 71, i3–i14 (2022). · DOI
  12. Nakane, T. et al. Single-particle cryo-EM at atomic resolution. Nature 587, 152–156 (2020). · DOI
  13. Yip, K. M. et al. Atomic-resolution protein structure determination by cryo-EM. Nature 587, 157–161 (2020). · DOI
  14. Scheres, S. H. W. A Bayesian view on cryo-EM structure determination. J. Mol. Biol. 415, 406–418 (2012). · DOI
  15. Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Punjani, A. et al. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Grant, T., Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. cisTEM, user-friendly software for single-particle image processing. eLife 7, e35383 (2018). · DOI
  18. Wang, G., Ye, J. C. & De Man, B. Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 737–748 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Zhong, E. D. et al. CryoDRGN: reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks. Nat. Methods 18, 176–185 (2021). · DOI
  20. Chen, M. & Ludtke, S. J. Deep learning-based mixed-dimensional Gaussian mixture model for characterizing variability in cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 18, 930–936 (2021). · DOI
  21. Punjani, A. & Fleet, D. J. 3DFlex: determining structure and motion of flexible proteins from cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 20, 860–870 (2023) · DOI
  22. Mildenhall, B. et al. NeRF: representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Commun. ACM 65, 99–106 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Liao, M. et al. Structure of the TRPV1 ion channel determined by electron cryo-microscopy. Nature 504, 107–112 (2013). · DOI
  24. Davis, J. H. et al. Modular assembly of the bacterial large ribosomal subunit. Cell 167, 1610–1622.e15 (2016). · DOI
  25. Ru, H. et al. Molecular mechanism of V(D)J recombination from synaptic RAG1-RAG2 complex structures. Cell 163, 1138–1152 (2015). · DOI
  26. Ke, Z. et al. Structures and distributions of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins on intact virions. Nature 588, 498–502 (2020). · DOI
  27. Leschziner, A. E. & Nogales, E. Visualizing flexibility at molecular resolution: analysis of heterogeneity in single-particle electron microscopy reconstructions. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36, 43–62 (2007). · DOI
  28. Bai, X. C., McMullan, G. & Scheres, S. H. W. How cryo-EM is revolutionizing structural biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 49–57 (2015). · DOI
  29. Tan, Y. Z. et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods 14, 793–796 (2017). · DOI
  30. Levy, A. et al. CryoAI: amortized inference of poses for ab initio reconstruction of 3D molecular volumes from real cryo-EM images. In Computer Vision—ECCV 2022 540–557 (Springer, 2022). · DOI
  31. Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020). · DOI
  32. Terwilliger, T. C. et al. Improvement of cryo-EM maps by density modification. Nat. Methods 17, 923–927 (2020). · DOI
  33. Terwilliger, T. C. et al. Density modification of cryo-EM maps. Acta Cryst. D76, 912–925 (2020).
  34. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Cryst. D75, 861–877 (2019).
  35. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014). · DOI
  36. Kingma, D. P. & Welling, M. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. In 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2014).
  37. Iudin, A. et al. EMPIAR: the Electron Microscopy Public Image Archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1503–D1511 (2023). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Huang, Y., Zhu, C., Yang, X., & Liu, M.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Yang, Xiaokang
  • Liu, Manhua
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2024-07-12
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
892-903
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400588667
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, high-resolution structure determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-resolution real-space reconstruction of cryo-EM structures using a neural field network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s42256-024-00870-2
The paper
Huang, Y., Zhu, C., Yang, X., & Liu, M. (2024). High-resolution real-space reconstruction of cryo-EM structures using a neural field network. Nature Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00870-2