Cited by 49Climate change and permafrostSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMarine Plankton and Biogeochemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The land–ocean Arctic carbon cycle

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43017-024-00627-w

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 179

  1. Rantanen, M. et al. The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 168 (2022). · DOI
  2. Tank, S. E. et al. Recent trends in the chemistry of major northern rivers signal widespread Arctic change. Nat. Geosci. 16, 789–796 (2023). · DOI
  3. IPCC Working Group I. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
  4. IPCC. The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022). · DOI
  5. Parmentier, F.-J. W. et al. A synthesis of the Arctic terrestrial and marine carbon cycles under pressure from a dwindling cryosphere. Ambio 46, 53–69 (2017). · DOI
  6. Hugelius, G. et al. Estimated stocks of circumpolar permafrost carbon with quantified uncertainty ranges and identified data gaps. Biogeosciences 11, 6573–6593 (2014). · DOI
  7. Schuur, E. A. G. et al. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature 520, 171–179 (2015). · DOI
  8. Schaefer, K. et al. Potential impacts of mercury released from thawing permafrost. Nat. Commun. 11, 4650 (2020).
  9. Miner, K. R. et al. Emergent biogeochemical risks from Arctic permafrost degradation. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 809–819 (2021). · DOI
  10. Jakobsson, M. Hypsometry and volume of the Arctic Ocean and its constituent seas. Geochem. Geophys. 3, 1–18 (2002). · DOI
  11. International Hydrographic Organization (IHO). Limits of oceans and seas. IHO Spec. Publ. 23, 38 (1953).
  12. Yamamoto, A., Kawamiya, M., Ishida, A., Yamanaka, Y. & Watanabe, S. Impact of rapid sea-ice reduction in the Arctic Ocean on the rate of ocean acidification. Biogeosciences 9, 2365–2375 (2012). · DOI
  13. Semiletov, I. et al. Acidification of East Siberian Arctic Shelf waters through addition of freshwater and terrestrial carbon. Nat. Geosci. 9, 361–365 (2016). · DOI
  14. Terhaar, J., Orr, J. C., Ethé, C., Regnier, P. & Bopp, L. Simulated Arctic Ocean response to doubling of riverine carbon and nutrient delivery. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 1048–1070 (2019). · DOI
  15. Hilton, R. G. et al. Erosion of organic carbon in the Arctic as a geological carbon dioxide sink. Nature 524, 84–87 (2015). · DOI
  16. Yasunari, T. J. et al. Relationship between circum-Arctic atmospheric wave patterns and large-scale wildfires in boreal summer. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 064009 (2021). · DOI
  17. Descals, A. et al. Unprecedented fire activity above the Arctic Circle linked to rising temperatures. Science 378, 532–537 (2022). · DOI
  18. Stroeve, J. & Notz, D. Changing state of Arctic sea ice across all seasons. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 103001 (2018). · DOI
  19. Golledge, N. R. et al. Global environmental consequences of twenty-first-century ice-sheet melt. Nature 566, 65–72 (2019). · DOI
  20. Shiklomanov, A. et al. in Arctic Hydrology, Permafrost and Ecosystems (eds Yang, D. & Kane, D. L.) 703–738 (Springer, 2021). · DOI
  21. Biskaborn, B. K. et al. Permafrost is warming at a global scale. Nat. Commun. 10, 264 (2019). · DOI
  22. Fritz, M., Vonk, J. E. & Lantuit, H. Collapsing Arctic coastlines. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 6–7 (2017). · DOI
  23. Walvoord, M. A. & Kurylyk, B. L. Hydrologic impacts of thawing permafrost—a review. Vadose Zone J. 15, 1–20 (2016). · DOI
  24. Martens, J. et al. CASCADE—the Circum-Arctic Sediment CArbon DatabasE. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 2561–2572 (2021). · DOI
  25. Speetjens, N. J. et al. The pan-ARctic CAtchment DatabasE (ARCADE). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 541–554 (2023). · DOI
  26. Ramage, J. et al. The net GHG balance and budget of the permafrost region (2000–2020) from ecosystem flux upscaling. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 38, e2023GB007953 (2024). · DOI
  27. Hugelius, G. et al. The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database: spatially distributed datasets of soil coverage and soil carbon storage in the northern permafrost regions. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 5, 3–13 (2013). · DOI
  28. Biskaborn, B. K. et al. The new database of the Global Terrestrial Network for Permafrost (GTN-P). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 7, 245–259 (2015). · DOI
  29. Stein, R. & Macdonald, R. W. The Organic Carbon Cycle in the Arctic Ocean (Springer, 2004). · DOI
  30. McGuire, A. D. et al. Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change. Ecol. Monogr. 79, 523–555 (2009). · DOI
  31. Jackson, R. B. et al. The ecology of soil carbon: pools, vulnerabilities, and biotic and abiotic controls. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 419–445 (2017). · DOI
  32. Strauss, J. et al. Deep Yedoma permafrost: a synthesis of depositional characteristics and carbon vulnerability. Earth-Sci. Rev. 172, 75–86 (2017). · DOI
  33. Opfergelt, S. The next generation of climate model should account for the evolution of mineral–organic interactions with permafrost thaw. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 091003 (2020). · DOI
  34. Stockmann, U. et al. The knowns, known unknowns and unknowns of sequestration of soil organic carbon. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 164, 80–99 (2013). · DOI
  35. Liu, Z. et al. Widespread deepening of the active layer in northern permafrost regions from 2003 to 2020. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 014020 (2024). · DOI
  36. Olefeldt, D. et al. Circumpolar distribution and carbon storage of thermokarst landscapes. Nat. Commun. 7, 13043 (2016). · DOI
  37. Turetsky, M. R. et al. Carbon release through abrupt permafrost thaw. Nat. Geosci. 13, 138–143 (2020). · DOI
  38. Hugelius, G. et al. Large stocks of peatland carbon and nitrogen are vulnerable to permafrost thaw. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 20438–20446 (2020). · DOI
  39. Kokelj, S. V. et al. Thaw-driven mass wasting couples slopes with downstream systems, and effects propagate through Arctic drainage networks. Cryosphere 15, 3059–3081 (2021). · DOI
  40. Webb, E. E. et al. Permafrost thaw drives surface water decline across lake-rich regions of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 841–846 (2022). · DOI
  41. Nobre, A. D. et al. Height Above the Nearest Drainage—a hydrologically relevant new terrain model. J. Hydrol. 404, 13–29 (2011). · DOI
  42. Anthony, K. M. et al. A shift of thermokarst lakes from carbon sources to sinks during the Holocene epoch. Nature 511, 452–456 (2014). · DOI
  43. Liljedahl, A. K. et al. Pan-Arctic ice-wedge degradation in warming permafrost and its influence on tundra hydrology. Nat. Geosci. 9, 312–318 (2016). · DOI
  44. Heslop, J. K. et al. A synthesis of methane dynamics in thermokarst lake environments. Earth-Sci. Rev. 210, 103365 (2020). · DOI
  45. Kokelj, S. V. et al. Increased precipitation drives mega slump development and destabilization of ice-rich permafrost terrain, northwestern Canada. Glob. Planet. Change 129, 56–68 (2015). · DOI
  46. Vonk, J. E. et al. Reviews and syntheses: effects of permafrost thaw on Arctic aquatic ecosystems. Biogeosciences 12, 7129–7167 (2015). · DOI
  47. Tank, S. E. et al. Landscape matters: predicting the biogeochemical effects of permafrost thaw on aquatic networks with a state factor approach. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 31, 358–370 (2020). · DOI
  48. Schuur, E. A. G. et al. Permafrost and climate change: carbon cycle feedbacks from the warming Arctic. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 47, 343–371 (2022). · DOI
  49. Schneider von Deimling, T. et al. Observation-based modelling of permafrost carbon fluxes with accounting for deep carbon deposits and thermokarst activity. Biogeosciences 12, 3469–3488 (2015). · DOI
  50. Aas, K. S. et al. Thaw processes in ice-rich permafrost landscapes represented with laterally coupled tiles in a land surface model. Cryosphere 13, 591–609 (2019). · DOI
  51. Paradis, S. et al. The Modern Ocean Sediment Archive and Inventory of Carbon (MOSAIC): version 2.0. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 4105–4125 (2023). · DOI
  52. Vetrov, A. & Romankevich, E. A. Carbon Cycle in the Russian Arctic Seas (Springer, 2004). · DOI
  53. Blasco, S. M. et al. 2010 State of Knowledge: Beaufort Sea Seabed Geohazards Associated with Offshore Hydrocarbon Development Open File 6989 (Geological Survey of Canada, 2013). · DOI
  54. Menard, H. W. & Smith, S. M. Hypsometry of ocean basin provinces. J. Geophys. Res. 71, 4305–4325 (1966). · DOI
  55. Shiklomanov, I. A. & Shiklomanov, A. I. Climatic change and the dynamics of river runoff into the Arctic Ocean. Water Resour. 30, 593–601 (2003). · DOI
  56. McClelland, J. W., Holmes, R. M., Dunton, K. H. & Macdonald, R. W. The Arctic Ocean estuary. Estuaries Coasts 35, 353–368 (2012). · DOI
  57. Cauwet, G. & Sidorov, I. The biogeochemistry of Lena River: organic carbon and nutrients distribution. Mar. Chem. 53, 211–227 (1996). · DOI
  58. Weingartner, T. J., Danielson, S., Sasaki, Y., Pavlov, V. & Kulakov, M. The Siberian Coastal Current: a wind- and buoyancy-forced Arctic coastal current. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 104, 29697–29713 (1999). · DOI
  59. Raymond, P. A. et al. Flux and age of dissolved organic carbon exported to the Arctic Ocean: a carbon isotopic study of the five largest Arctic rivers. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB4011 (2007).
  60. Holmes, R. M. et al. Seasonal and annual fluxes of nutrients and organic matter from large rivers to the Arctic Ocean and surrounding seas. Estuaries Coasts 35, 369–382 (2012). · DOI
  61. Nielsen, D. M. et al. Increase in Arctic coastal erosion and its sensitivity to warming in the twenty-first century. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 263–270 (2022). · DOI
  62. Tremblay, J.-É. et al. Global and regional drivers of nutrient supply, primary production and CO2 drawdown in the changing Arctic Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 139, 171–196 (2015). · DOI
  63. Terhaar, J., Lauerwald, R., Regnier, P., Gruber, N. & Bopp, L. Around one third of current Arctic Ocean primary production sustained by rivers and coastal erosion. Nat. Commun. 12, 169 (2021). · DOI
  64. Fichot, C. G. et al. Pan-Arctic distributions of continental runoff in the Arctic Ocean. Sci. Rep. 3, 1053 (2013). · DOI
  65. Alling, V. et al. Nonconservative behavior of dissolved organic carbon across the Laptev and East Siberian seas. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003834 (2010). · DOI
  66. Sánchez-García, L. et al. Inventories and behavior of particulate organic carbon in the Laptev and East Siberian seas. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 25, GB2007 (2011). · DOI
  67. Lee, Y. J. et al. An assessment of phytoplankton primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean from satellite ocean color/in situ chlorophyll-a based models. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 120, 6508–6541 (2015). · DOI
  68. Lee, Y. J. et al. Net primary productivity estimates and environmental variables in the Arctic Ocean: an assessment of coupled physical–biogeochemical models. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 121, 8635–8669 (2016). · DOI
  69. Aumont, O. & Bopp, L. Globalizing results from ocean in situ iron fertilization studies. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GB002591 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  70. Holmes, R. M. et al. Lability of DOC transported by Alaskan rivers to the Arctic Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L03402 (2008). · DOI
  71. Mann, P. J. et al. Utilization of ancient permafrost carbon in headwaters of Arctic fluvial networks. Nat. Commun. 6, 7856 (2015).
  72. Tanski, G. et al. Rapid CO2 release from eroding permafrost in seawater. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 11244–11252 (2019). · DOI
  73. Lewis, K. M., van Dijken, G. L. & Arrigo, K. R. Changes in phytoplankton concentration now drive increased Arctic Ocean primary production. Science 369, 198–202 (2020). · DOI
  74. Liu, S. et al. The importance of hydrology in routing terrestrial carbon to the atmosphere via global streams and rivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2106322119 (2022).
  75. Vonk, J. E., Tank, S. E. & Walvoord, M. A. Integrating hydrology and biogeochemistry across frozen landscapes. Nat. Commun. 10, 5377 (2019).
  76. Tank, S. E. et al. A land-to-ocean perspective on the magnitude, source and implication of DIC flux from major Arctic rivers to the Arctic Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GB004192 (2012). · DOI
  77. Bertin, C. et al. Biogeochemical river runoff drives intense coastal Arctic Ocean CO2 outgassing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2022GL102377 (2023). · DOI
  78. McClelland, J. W., Tank, S. E., Spencer, R. G. M. & Shiklomanov, A. I. Coordination and sustainability of river observing activities in the Arctic. Arctic 68, 59–68 (2015). · DOI
  79. McClelland, J. W. et al. Particulate organic carbon and nitrogen export from major Arctic rivers. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 629–643 (2016). · DOI
  80. Behnke, M. et al. Aquatic biomass is a major source to particulate organic matter export in large Arctic rivers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, 1–9 (2023). · DOI
  81. Drake, T. W. et al. Increasing alkalinity export from large Russian Arctic rivers. Environ. Sci. Tech. 52, 8302–8308 (2018). · DOI
  82. Zolkos, S. et al. Multidecadal declines in particulate mercury and sediment export from Russian rivers in the pan-Arctic basin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2119857119 (2022). · DOI
  83. Emmerton, C. A., Lesack, L. F. W. & Vincent, W. F. Mackenzie river nutrient delivery to the Arctic Ocean and effects of the Mackenzie Delta during open water conditions. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB1024 (2008). · DOI
  84. Keskitalo, K. H. et al. Downstream evolution of particulate organic matter composition from permafrost thaw slumps. Front. Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.642675 (2021). · DOI
  85. Lantuit, H. et al. The Arctic Coastal Dynamics database: a new classification scheme and statistics on Arctic permafrost coastlines. Estuaries Coasts 35, 383–400 (2012). · DOI
  86. Irrgang, A. M. et al. Drivers, dynamics and impacts of changing Arctic coasts. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 39–54 (2022). · DOI
  87. Romanovskii, N. N. et al. Thermokarst and land–ocean interactions, Laptev Sea region, Russia. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 11, 137–152 (2000). · DOI
  88. Jong, D. et al. Nearshore zone dynamics determine pathway of organic carbon from eroding permafrost coasts. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088561 (2020). · DOI
  89. Couture, N. J., Irrgang, A., Pollard, W., Lantuit, H. & Fritz, M. Coastal erosion of permafrost soils along the Yukon coastal plain and fluxes of organic carbon to the Canadian Beaufort Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 123, 406–422 (2018). · DOI
  90. Grotheer, H. et al. Burial and origin of permafrost-derived carbon in the nearshore zone of the Southern Canadian Beaufort Sea. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085897 (2020). · DOI
  91. Martens, J., Wild, B., Semiletov, I., Dudarev, O. V. & Gustafsson, Ö. Circum-Arctic release of terrestrial carbon varies between regions and sources. Nat. Commun. 13, 5858 (2022). · DOI
  92. Jong, D. et al. Selective sorting and degradation of permafrost organic matter in the nearshore zone of Herschel Island (Yukon, Canada). J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 129, e2023JG007479 (2024). · DOI
  93. Jones, B. M. et al. Increase in the rate and uniformity of coastline erosion in Arctic Alaska. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L03503 (2009).
  94. Novikova, A. et al. Dynamics of permafrost coasts of Baydaratskaya Bay (Kara Sea) based on multi-temporal remote sensing data. Remote. Sens. 10, 1481 (2018). · DOI
  95. Nicu, I. C., Rubensdotter, L., Stalsberg, K. & Nau, E. Coastal erosion of Arctic cultural heritage in danger: a case study from Svalbard. Norway. Water 13, 784 (2021). · DOI
  96. Günther, F. et al. Observing Muostakh disappear: permafrost thaw subsidence and erosion of a ground-ice-rich island in response to Arctic summer warming and sea ice reduction. Cryosphere 9, 151–178 (2015). · DOI
  97. Jones, B. M. et al. A decade of remotely sensed observations highlight complex processes linked to coastal permafrost bluff erosion in the Arctic. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 115001 (2018). · DOI
  98. Gibbs, A. E. & Richmond, B. M. National Assessment of Shoreline Change—Summary Statistics for Updated Vector Shorelines and Associated Shoreline Change Data for the North Coast of Alaska, U.S.–Canadian Border to Icy Cape Report No. 2017-1107 (US Geological Survey, 2017). · DOI
  99. Irrgang, A. M., Lantuit, H., Gordon, R. R., Piskor, A. & Manson, G. K. Impacts of past and future coastal changes on the Yukon coast—threats for cultural sites, infrastructure, and travel routes. Arct. Sci. 5, 107–126 (2019). · DOI
  100. Bristol, E. M. et al. Geochemistry of coastal permafrost and erosion-driven organic matter fluxes to the Beaufort Sea near Drew Point. Alaska. Front. Earth Sci. 8, 598933 (2021). · DOI
  101. Sánchez-García, L. et al. Characterisation of three regimes of collapsing Arctic ice complex deposits on the SE Laptev Sea coast using biomarkers and dual carbon isotopes. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 25, 172–183 (2014). · DOI
  102. Wegner, C. et al. Variability in transport of terrigenous material on the shelves and the deep Arctic Ocean during the Holocene. Polar Res. 34, 24964 (2015). · DOI
  103. Rachold, V. et al. in The Organic Carbon Cycle in the Arctic Ocean (eds Stein, R. & MacDonald, R. W.) 33–55 (Springer, 2004). · DOI
  104. Rachold, V. et al. Coastal erosion vs riverine sediment discharge in the Arctic shelf seas. Int. J. Earth. Sci. 89, 450–460 (2000). · DOI
  105. Fritz, M. et al. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in Arctic ground ice. Cryosphere 9, 737–752 (2015). · DOI
  106. Rödenbeck, C., Zaehle, S., Keeling, R. & Heimann, M. How does the terrestrial carbon exchange respond to inter-annual climatic variations? A quantification based on atmospheric CO2 data. Biogeosciences 15, 2481–2498 (2018). · DOI
  107. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2022. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 4811–4900 (2022). · DOI
  108. Bruhwiler, L., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Crill, P., Leonard, M. & Palmer, P. I. The Arctic carbon cycle and its response to changing climate. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 7, 14–34 (2021). · DOI
  109. Ciais, P. et al. Definitions and methods to estimate regional land carbon fluxes for the second phase of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Project (RECCAP-2). Geosci. Model. Dev. 15, 1289–1316 (2022). · DOI
  110. McGuire, A. D. et al. An assessment of the carbon balance of Arctic tundra: comparisons among observations, process models, and atmospheric inversions. Biogeosciences 9, 3185–3204 (2012). · DOI
  111. Hugelius, G. et al. Permafrost region greenhouse gas budgets suggest a weak CO2 sink and CH4 and N2O sources, but magnitudes differ between top-down and bottom-up methods. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 37, e2023GB007969 (2023).
  112. Treat, C. C. et al. Permafrost carbon: progress on understanding stocks and fluxes across northern terrestrial ecosystems. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 129, e2023JG007638 (2024). · DOI
  113. Olefeldt, D. et al. The Boreal–Arctic Wetland and Lake Dataset (BAWLD). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 5127–5149 (2021). · DOI
  114. Lundin, E. J. et al. Large difference in carbon emission—burial balances between boreal and Arctic lakes. Sci. Rep. 5, 14248 (2015). · DOI
  115. Mendonça, R. et al. Organic carbon burial in global lakes and reservoirs. Nat. Commun. 8, 1694 (2017). · DOI
  116. Bastviken, D., Cole, J., Pace, M. & Tranvik, L. Methane emissions from lakes: dependence of lake characteristics, two regional assessments, and a global estimate. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 18, GB4009 (2004). · DOI
  117. Kuhn, M. A. et al. BAWLD-CH4: a comprehensive dataset of methane fluxes from boreal and Arctic ecosystems. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 5151–5189 (2021). · DOI
  118. Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 1561–1623 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  119. Walter, K. M., Zimov, S. A., Chanton, J. P., Verbyla, D. & Chapin, F. S. Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming. Nature 443, 71–75 (2006). · DOI
  120. Cole, J. J. et al. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosyst 10, 172–185 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  121. Drake, B. L., Hanson, D. T., Lowrey, T. K. & Sharp, Z. D. The carbon fertilization effect over a century of anthropogenic CO2 emissions: higher intracellular CO2 and more drought resistance among invasive and native grass species contrasts with increased water use efficiency for woody plants in the US Southwest. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 782–792 (2017). · DOI
  122. Sieczko, A. K. et al. Diel variability of methane emissions from lakes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 21488–21494 (2020). · DOI
  123. Bates, N. R. & Mathis, J. T. The Arctic Ocean marine carbon cycle: evaluation of air–sea CO2 exchanges, ocean acidification impacts and potential feedbacks. Biogeosciences 6, 2433–2459 (2009). · DOI
  124. Arrigo, K. R., Pabi, S., van Dijken, G. L. & Maslowski, W. Air–sea flux of CO2 in the Arctic Ocean, 1998–2003. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG001224 (2010). · DOI
  125. Manizza, M. et al. Changes in the Arctic Ocean CO2 sink (1996–2007): a regional model analysis. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 1108–1118 (2013). · DOI
  126. Schuster, U. et al. An assessment of the Atlantic and Arctic sea–air CO2 fluxes, 1990–2009. Biogeosciences 10, 607–627 (2013). · DOI
  127. MacGilchrist, G. A. et al. The Arctic Ocean carbon sink. Deep. Sea Res. Part. I: Oceanographic Res. Pap. 86, 39–55 (2014). · DOI
  128. Yasunaka, S. et al. Mapping of the air–sea CO2 flux in the Arctic Ocean and its adjacent seas: basin-wide distribution and seasonal to interannual variability. Polar Sci. 10, 323–334 (2016). · DOI
  129. Yasunaka, S. et al. Arctic Ocean CO2 uptake: an improved multiyear estimate of the air–sea CO2 flux incorporating chlorophyll a concentrations. Biogeosciences 15, 1643–1661 (2018). · DOI
  130. Manizza, M., Menemenlis, D., Zhang, H. & Miller, C. E. Modeling the recent changes in the Arctic Ocean CO2 sink (2006–2013). Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 420–438 (2019). · DOI
  131. Mortenson, E. et al. Modeled impacts of sea ice exchange processes on Arctic Ocean carbon uptake and acidification (1980–2015). J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 125, e2019JC015782 (2020). · DOI
  132. Arrigo, K. R. & van Dijken, G. L. Continued increases in Arctic Ocean primary production. Prog. Oceanogr. 136, 60–70 (2015). · DOI
  133. Bates, N. R. Air–sea CO2 fluxes and the continental shelf pump of carbon in the Chukchi Sea adjacent to the Arctic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 111, C10013 (2006). · DOI
  134. Parmentier, F.-J. W. et al. The impact of lower sea-ice extent on Arctic greenhouse-gas exchange. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 195–202 (2013). · DOI
  135. Hauri, C. et al. Wind-driven mixing causes a reduction in the strength of the continental shelf carbon pump in the Chukchi Sea. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 5932–5936 (2013). · DOI
  136. Crawford, A. D., Krumhardt, K. M., Lovenduski, N. S., van Dijken, G. L. & Arrigo, K. R. Summer high-wind events and phytoplankton productivity in the Arctic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 125, e2020JC016565 (2020). · DOI
  137. Yasunaka, S. et al. An assessment of CO2 uptake in the Arctic Ocean from 1985 to 2018. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 37, e2023GB007806 (2023). · DOI
  138. Oziel, L. et al. Climate change and terrigenous inputs decrease the efficiency of the future Arctic Ocean’s biological carbon pump. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02233-6 (2024). · DOI
  139. Roobaert, A., Regnier, P., Landschützer, P. & Laruelle, G. G. A novel sea surface pCO2-product for the global coastal ocean resolving trends over 1982–2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 16, 421–441 (2024). · DOI
  140. Carmack, E. & Wassmann, P. Food webs and physical–biological coupling on pan-Arctic shelves: unifying concepts and comprehensive perspectives. Prog. Oceanogr. 71, 446–477 (2006). · DOI
  141. Pisareva, M. N. et al. Flow of pacific water in the western Chukchi Sea: results from the 2009 RUSALCA expedition. Deep. Sea Res. Part. I: Oceanographic Res. Pap. 105, 53–73 (2015). · DOI
  142. Pabi, S. & Arrigo, K. R. Satellite estimation of marine particulate organic carbon in waters dominated by different phytoplankton taxa. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003137 (2006). · DOI
  143. Manizza, M. et al. A model of the Arctic Ocean carbon cycle. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 116, C12020 (2011). · DOI
  144. Nielsen, D. M. et al. Reduced Arctic Ocean CO2 uptake due to coastal permafrost erosion. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 968–975 (2024). · DOI
  145. Déry, S. J., Mlynowski, T. J., Hernández-Henríquez, M. A. & Straneo, F. Interannual variability and interdecadal trends in Hudson Bay streamflow. J. Mar. Syst. 88, 341–351 (2011). · DOI
  146. Ahmed, M. M. M., Else, B. G. T., Capelle, D., Miller, L. A. & Papakyriakou, T. Underestimation of surface pCO2 and air–sea CO2 fluxes due to freshwater stratification in an Arctic shelf sea, Hudson Bay. Elem. Sci. Anth. 8, 084 (2020). · DOI
  147. Else, B. G. T., Papakyriakou, T. N., Granskog, M. A. & Yackel, J. J. Observations of sea surface fCO2 distributions and estimated air–sea CO2 fluxes in the Hudson Bay region (Canada) during the open water season. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 113, C08026 (2008).
  148. Else, B. G. T., Yackel, J. J. & Papakyriakou, T. N. Application of satellite remote sensing techniques for estimating air–sea CO2 fluxes in Hudson Bay, Canada during the ice-free season. Remote. Sens. Environ. 112, 3550–3562 (2008). · DOI
  149. Bates, N. R., Cai, W.-J. & Mathis, J. T. The ocean carbon cycle in the western Arctic Ocean: distributions and air–sea fluxes of carbon dioxide. Oceanogr 24, 186–201 (2011). · DOI
  150. Meire, L. et al. Marine-terminating glaciers sustain high productivity in Greenland fjords. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 5344–5357 (2017). · DOI
  151. Smith, R. W., Bianchi, T. S., Allison, M., Savage, C. & Galy, V. High rates of organic carbon burial in fjord sediments globally. Nat. Geosci. 8, 450–453 (2015). · DOI
  152. Thornton, B. F., Geibel, M. C., Crill, P. M., Humborg, C. & Mörth, C.-M. Methane fluxes from the sea to the atmosphere across the Siberian shelf seas. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5869–5877 (2016). · DOI
  153. Shakhova, N. et al. Ebullition and storm-induced methane release from the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. Nat. Geosci. 7, 64–70 (2014). · DOI
  154. Martens, J. et al. Off-shelf transport and biogeochemical cycling of terrestrial organic carbon along the East Siberian continental margin. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 38, e2024GB008104 (2024). · DOI
  155. Vonk, J. E. et al. Activation of old carbon by erosion of coastal and subsea permafrost in Arctic Siberia. Nature 489, 137–140 (2012). · DOI
  156. Dudarev, O. V., Semiletov, I. P., Charkin, A. N. & Botsul, A. I. Deposition settings on the continental shelf of the East Siberian Sea. Dokl. Earth Sci. 409, 1000–1005 (2006). · DOI
  157. Bröder, L. et al. Fate of terrigenous organic matter across the Laptev Sea from the mouth of the Lena River to the deep sea of the Arctic interior. Biogeosciences 13, 5003–5019 (2016). · DOI
  158. Vonk, J. E. et al. Molecular and radiocarbon constraints on sources and degradation of terrestrial organic carbon along the Kolyma paleoriver transect, East Siberian Sea. Biogeosciences 7, 3153–3166 (2010). · DOI
  159. Bröder, L., Tesi, T., Andersson, A., Semiletov, I. & Gustafsson, Ö. Bounding cross-shelf transport time and degradation in Siberian–Arctic land–ocean carbon transfer. Nat. Commun. 9, 806 (2018). · DOI
  160. Anderson, L. G., Jutterström, S., Hjalmarsson, S., Wåhlström, I. & Semiletov, I. P. Out-gassing of CO2 from Siberian Shelf seas by terrestrial organic matter decomposition. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L20601 (2009). · DOI
  161. Rogge, A. et al. Carbon dioxide sink in the Arctic Ocean from cross-shelf transport of dense Barents Sea water. Nat. Geosci. 16, 82–88 (2023). · DOI
  162. Arndt, K. A. et al. Arctic greening associated with lengthening growing seasons in Northern Alaska. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 125018 (2019). · DOI
  163. Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 106–117 (2020). · DOI
  164. Watts, J. D. et al. Soil respiration strongly offsets carbon uptake in Alaska and Northwest Canada. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 084051 (2021). · DOI
  165. Karlsson, J. et al. Carbon emission from Western Siberian inland waters. Nat. Commun. 12, 825 (2021).
  166. Lundin, E. J., Giesler, R., Persson, A., Thompson, M. S. & Karlsson, J. Integrating carbon emissions from lakes and streams in a subarctic catchment. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 118, 1200–1207 (2013). · DOI
  167. Straneo, F. & Cenedese, C. The dynamics of greenland’s glacial fjords and their role in climate. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 7, 89–112 (2015). · DOI
  168. Bianchi, T. S. et al. Fjords as aquatic critical zones (ACZs). Earth-Sci. Rev. 203, 103145 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  169. Ouyang, Z. et al. Sea-ice loss amplifies summertime decadal CO2 increase in the western Arctic Ocean. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 678–684 (2020). · DOI
  170. Raymond, P. A. et al. Scaling the gas transfer velocity and hydraulic geometry in streams and small rivers. Limnol. Oceanogr. Fluids Environ. 2, 41–53 (2012). · DOI
  171. Pallandt, M. M. T. A. et al. Representativeness assessment of the pan-Arctic eddy covariance site network and optimized future enhancements. Biogeosciences 19, 559–583 (2022). · DOI
  172. Faust, J. C. et al. New evidence for preservation of contemporary marine organic carbon by iron in Arctic shelf sediments. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 014006 (2023). · DOI
  173. Timothy Lenton, M. et al. (eds) The Global Tipping Points Report 2023 (Univ. of Exeter, 2023). · DOI
  174. Natali, S. M. et al. Permafrost carbon feedbacks threaten global climate goals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2100163118 (2021). · DOI
  175. Hirst, C. et al. Evidence for late winter biogeochemical connectivity in permafrost soils. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 85 (2023). · DOI
  176. Palmtag, J. et al. A high spatial resolution soil carbon and nitrogen dataset for the northern permafrost region based on circumpolar land cover upscaling. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 4095–4110 (2022). · DOI
  177. Poggio, L. et al. SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. SOIL 7, 217–240 (2021). · DOI
  178. Shiklomanov, A. & Lammers, R. B. in Climate Vulnerability (ed. Hossain, F.) 161–175 (Academic, 2013). · DOI
  179. Bélanger, S., Babin, M. & Tremblay, J. É. Increasing cloudiness in Arctic damps the increase in phytoplankton primary production due to sea ice receding. Biogeosciences 10, 4087–4101 (2013). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vonk, J. E., Fritz, M., Speetjens, N. J., Babin, M., Bartsch, A., Basso, L. S., Bröder, L., Göckede, M., Gustafsson, Ö., Hugelius, G., Irrgang, A. M., Juhls, B., Kuhn, M. A., Lantuit, H., Manizza, M., Martens, J., O’Regan, M., Suslova, A., Tank, S. E., Terhaar, J., & Zolkos, S.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • b.geos (AT)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US)
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Vonk, Jorien E.
  • Fritz, Michael
Venue
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
Published
2025-02-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
86-105
ISSN
2662-138X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407246630
Cited by
49
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 19
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Earth & Environment (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1913888, 1922922)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • European Space Agency
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (209044)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (VI.Vidi.193.100)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2021-06670)
  • H2020 European Research Council (951288)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Climate change and permafrost
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Plankton and Biogeochemistry
Keywords
Arctic carbon cycle, land-ocean continuum, terrestrial carbon stocks, marine sediment, ocean carbon uptake, organic carbon burial, methane emissions, inland waters, coastal erosion, Arctic greening, soil respiration, extreme events, global warming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review