Cited by 395Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingAI in cancer detection

Multimodal integration of radiology, pathology and genomics for prediction of response to PD-(L)1 blockade in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Open access
Vanguri, Rami S., Luo, Jia, Aukerman, Andrew T., Egger, Jacklynn V., Fong, Christopher J., Horvat, Natally, Pagano, Andrew, Araujo-Filho, Jose de Arimateia Batista +15 more·2022·Nature Cancer

Abstract

Immunotherapy is used to treat almost all patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, identifying robust predictive biomarkers remains challenging. Here we show the predictive capacity of integrating medical imaging, histopathologic and genomic features to predict immunotherapy response using a cohort of 247 patients with advanced NSCLC with multimodal baseline data obtained during diagnostic clinical workup, including computed tomography scan images, digitized programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry slides and known outcomes to immunotherapy. Using domain expert annotations, we developed a computational workflow to extract patient-level features and used a machine-learning approach to integrate multimodal features into a risk prediction model. Our multimodal model (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.86) outperformed unimodal measures, including tumor mutational burden (AUC = 0.61, 95% CI 0.52-0.70) and programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry score (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.81). Our study therefore provides a quantitative rationale for using multimodal features to improve prediction of immunotherapy response in patients with NSCLC using expert-guided machine learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43018-022-00416-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vanguri et al. introduced the DyAM framework, which integrates CT images, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, and genomic features for predicting clinical responses in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with cancer immunotherapy.

    “Vanguri et al. introduced the DyAM framework, which integrates CT images, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), and genomic features for predicting clinical responses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with cancer immunotherapy [102].”
  • Vanguri and colleagues demonstrated that a multimodal model including CT images, digitized PD-L1 IHC slides, and molecular alteration data performed significantly better than unimodal models in predicting immunotherapy response in NSCLC.

    “Vanguri and colleagues (108) demonstrated that a multimodal model that included CT images, digitized PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides, and molecular alteration data performed significantly better than unimodal models in predicting response to immunotherapy in NSCLC.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 395

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Skoulidis F Mutations and PD-1 inhibitor resistance in -mutant lung adenocarcinoma Cancer Discov. 2018 8 822 835 29773717 PMC6030433

Authors
Vanguri, R. S., Luo, J., Aukerman, A. T., Egger, J. V., Fong, C. J., Horvat, N., Pagano, A., Araujo-Filho, J. D. A. B., Geneslaw, L., Rizvi, H., Sosa, R., Boehm, K. M., Yang, S.-R., Bodd, F. M., Ventura, K., Hollmann, T. J., Ginsberg, M. S., Gao, J., MSK MIND Consortium, Vanguri, R., Hellmann, M. D., Sauter, J. L., & Shah, S. P.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sauter, Jennifer L.
  • Shah, Sohrab P.
Venue
Nature Cancer
Published
2022-08-29
Volume
3
Issue
10
Pages
1151-1164
ISSN
2662-1347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293476620
Cited by
395
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 2
FWCI
30.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748, F30CA257414)
  • Cycle for Survival
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007739)
  • Grayer Fellowship (MSKCC), Cycle for Survival
  • Susan G. Komen Scholars Program, Cycle for Survival
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, PD-L1 blockade, immunotherapy response prediction, predictive biomarkers, multimodal data integration, radiology, pathology, genomics, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, tumor mutational burden, risk prediction model, expert annotation, machine learning
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Radiology, Genomics, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review