Cited by 23Fish Ecology and Management StudiesFish biology, ecology, and behaviorFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Widespread and strong impacts of river fragmentation by anthropogenic barriers on fishes in the Mekong River Basin

Open access
Sun, Jingrui, Baldan, Damiano, Lucas, Martyn C., Wang, Jie, Rodeles, Amaia A., Galib, Shams M., Tao, Juan, Li, Mingbo +2 more·2025·Communications Earth & Environment

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract The Mekong River, a global freshwater biodiversity hotspot, has suffered from intensive barrier construction, resulting in major challenges in safeguarding its fauna. Here, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of the impacts of river barriers on the distribution of 1,032 fish species in the Mekong Basin. Our analysis revealed that 93% of Mekong fish species suffer from habitat fragmentation, and species with larger habitat range requirements experienced higher river fragmentation impacts. Sub-basins along the main channel in the Lower Mekong had high values of species richness but relatively high barrier impacts. Across all migration types, potamodromous fish had the worst habitat fragmentation status (Fragmentation Index, 42.56 [95% CI, 36.95–46.05]), followed by catadromous fish. Among all IUCN conservation status categories, Critically Endangered species experienced the highest habitat fragmentation index (33.34 [12.53–46.40]). Among all barrier types, small dams and sluice gates contribute more to habitat fragmentation than large dams.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43247-025-02467-y

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, J., Baldan, D., Lucas, M. C., Wang, J., Rodeles, A. A., Galib, S. M., Tao, J., Li, M., He, D., & Ding, C.
Affiliations
  • Yunnan University (CN)
  • National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics (IT)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Universidade de Vigo (ES)
  • University of Rajshahi (BD)
Corresponding author
Sun, Jingrui
Venue
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-07-07
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
2662-4435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412095420
Cited by
23
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 2
FWCI
14.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Earth & Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (42301064)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
river fragmentation, anthropogenic barriers, dams, sluice gates, fish distribution, freshwater fish, fish migration, potamodromous fish, critically endangered species, Mekong River Basin, Lower Mekong, species richness, freshwater biodiversity conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review