The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A probabilistic graphical model foundation for enabling predictive digital twins at scale
Open accessAbstract
A unifying mathematical formulation is needed to move from one-off digital twins built through custom implementations to robust digital twin implementations at scale. This work proposes a probabilistic graphical model as a formal mathematical representation of a digital twin and its associated physical asset. We create an abstraction of the asset–twin system as a set of coupled dynamical systems, evolving over time through their respective state spaces and interacting via observed data and control inputs. The formal definition of this coupled system as a probabilistic graphical model enables us to draw upon well-established theory and methods from Bayesian statistics, dynamical systems and control theory. The declarative and general nature of the proposed digital twin model make it rigorous yet flexible, enabling its application at scale in a diverse range of application areas. We demonstrate how the model is instantiated to enable a structural digital twin of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The digital twin is calibrated using experimental data from a physical UAV asset. Its use in dynamic decision-making is then illustrated in a synthetic example where the UAV undergoes an in-flight damage event and the digital twin is dynamically updated using sensor data. The graphical model foundation ensures that the digital twin calibration and updating process is principled, unified and able to scale to an entire fleet of digital twins. This work proposes a probabilistic graphical model as a formal mathematical foundation for digital twins, and demonstrates how this model supports principled data assimilation, optimal control and end-to-end uncertainty quantification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 21,974
ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System
Quigley, M. (2009) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · Cited by 8,729
(2009) · Cited by 6,153
The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles
Glaessgen, E., & Stargel, D. (2012) · 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA · doi:10.2514/6.2012-1818 · Cited by 2,404
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Data-Driven Science and Engineering: Machine Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Control
Brunton, S. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108380690 · Cited by 1,154
Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin
Tuegel, E. J., Ingraffea, A. R., Eason, T. G., & Spottswood, S. M. (2011) · International Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1155/2011/154798 · Cited by 1,119
Monte-Carlo Planning in Large POMDPs
Silver, D., & Veness, J. (2010) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 886
Digital Twins in Health Care: Ethical Implications of an Emerging Engineering Paradigm
Bruynseels, K., Santoni de Sio, F., & van den Hoven, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00031 · Cited by 704
Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy
Brynjarsdóttir, J., & OʼHagan, A. (2014) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114007 · Cited by 530
Cited by
Fusing Blockchain and AI With Metaverse: A Survey
Yang, Q., Zhao, Y., Huang, H., Xiong, Z., Kang, J., & Zheng, Z. (2022) · IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society · doi:10.1109/ojcs.2022.3188249 · Cited by 554
A comprehensive review of digital twin — part 1: modeling and twinning enabling technologies
Thelen, A., Zhang, X., Fink, O., Lu, Y., Ghosh, S., Youn, B. D., Todd, M. D., Mahadevan, S., Hu, C., & Hu, Z. (2022) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-022-03425-4 · Cited by 441
Digital twins for predictive oncology will be a paradigm shift for precision cancer care
Hernandez-Boussard, T., Macklin, P., Greenspan, E. J., Gryshuk, A. L., Stahlberg, E., Syeda-Mahmood, T., & Shmulevich, I. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01558-5 · Cited by 219
San, O. (2021) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-021-00077-0 · Cited by 66
Tran-Dang, H., & Kim, D.-S. (2025) · ICT Express · doi:10.1016/j.icte.2025.01.002 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Kapteyn, M. G., Pretorius, J. V. R., & Willcox, K. E.
- Venue
- Nature Computational Science
- Published
- 2021-05-20
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 337-347
- ISSN
- 2662-8457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3112364397
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 23.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A probabilistic graphical model foundation for enabling predictive digital twins at scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s43588-021-00069-0
- The paper
- Kapteyn, M. G., Pretorius, J. V. R., & Willcox, K. E. (2021). A probabilistic graphical model foundation for enabling predictive digital twins at scale. Nature Computational Science. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-021-00069-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.