Digital twins for predictive oncology will be a paradigm shift for precision cancer care
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integrating data from multiple sources to develop digital twin models using AI tools has already been proposed in precision oncology and cardiovascular health.
“Integrating data from multiple sources to develop digital twin models using AI tools has already been proposed in precision oncology and cardiovascular health 67,68 .”
From Multimodal biomedical AI (2022) · cites this paper as [67]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423 · see citing works
AI can be sexist and racist — it’s time to make it fair
Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05707-8 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Integrating evolutionary dynamics into treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer
Zhang, J., Cunningham, J. J., Brown, J. S., & Gatenby, R. A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01968-5 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Hernandez-Boussard, T., Bozkurt, S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Shah, N. H. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa088 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Self-citationA probabilistic graphical model foundation for enabling predictive digital twins at scale
Kapteyn, M. G., Pretorius, J. V. R., & Willcox, K. E. (2021) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-021-00069-0 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Ten simple rules for making research software more robust
Taschuk, M. L., & Wilson, G. (2017) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005412 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Bozkurt, S., Cahan, E. M., Seneviratne, M. G., Sun, R., Lossio-Ventura, J. A., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Hernandez‐Boussard, T. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa164 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationData and Models: A Framework for Advancing AI in Science
Fagnan, K., Nashed, Y. S. G., Perdue, G., et al. (2019) · doi:10.2172/1579323 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
CAFCW 113 Digital Twins for Predictive Cancer Care: an HPC-Enabled Community Initiative
Greenspan, E. J., Lauzon, C. B., Gryshuk, A. L., et al. (2019) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [8]Corbett-Davies S, Goel S. The measure and mismeasure of fairness: A critical review of fair machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:180800023. 2018;
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acosta, J. N., Falcone, G. J., Rajpurkar, P., & Topol, E. J. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01981-2 · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
Derraz, B., Breda, G., Kaempf, C., Baenke, F., Cotte, F., Reiche, K., Köhl, U., Kather, J. N., Eskenazy, D., & Gilbert, S. (2024) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-024-00517-w · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Bridging the gap between tumor-on-chip and clinics: a systematic review of 15 years of studies
Bouquerel, C., Dubrova, A., Hofer, I., Phan, D. T. T., Bernheim, M., Ladaigue, S., Cavaniol, C., Maddalo, D., Cabel, L., Mechta-Grigoriou, F., et al. (2023) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/d3lc00531c · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Reimagining cancer treatments in the era of generative AI
Derbal, Y. (2025) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/20552076251394631 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hernandez-Boussard, T., Macklin, P., Greenspan, E. J., Gryshuk, A. L., Stahlberg, E., Syeda-Mahmood, T., & Shmulevich, I.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
- IBM Research - Almaden (US)
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2021-11-25
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2065-2066
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- PMC
- PMC9097784
- OpenAlex
- W3215822628
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 22 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (R01CA183962)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- digital twin, predictive oncology, cancer modeling, high-performance computing, artificial intelligence in oncology, computational oncology
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, Precision Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
