Cited by 16Genomics and Rare DiseasesOcular Disorders and TreatmentsCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Deep mutational scanning quantifies DNA binding and predicts clinical outcomes of PAX6 variants

Open access
McDonnell, Alexander F, Plech, Marcin, Livesey, Benjamin J, Gerasimavicius, Lukas, Owen, Liusaidh J, Hall, Hildegard Nikki, FitzPatrick, David R, Marsh, Joseph A +1 more·2024·Molecular Systems Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Nonsense and missense mutations in the transcription factor PAX6 cause a wide range of eye development defects, including aniridia, microphthalmia and coloboma. To understand how changes of PAX6:DNA binding cause these phenotypes, we combined saturation mutagenesis of the paired domain of PAX6 with a yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assay in which expression of a PAX6-GAL4 fusion gene drives antibiotic resistance. We quantified binding of more than 2700 single amino-acid variants to two DNA sequence elements. Mutations in DNA-facing residues of the N-terminal subdomain and linker region were most detrimental, as were mutations to prolines and to negatively charged residues. Many variants caused sequence-specific molecular gain-of-function effects, including variants in position 71 that increased binding to the LE9 enhancer but decreased binding to a SELEX-derived binding site. In the absence of antibiotic selection, variants that retained DNA binding slowed yeast growth, likely because such variants perturbed the yeast transcriptome. Benchmarking against known patient variants and applying ACMG/AMP guidelines to variant classification, we obtained supporting-to-moderate evidence that 977 variants are likely pathogenic and 1306 are likely benign. Our analysis shows that most pathogenic mutations in the paired domain of PAX6 can be explained simply by the effects of these mutations on PAX6:DNA association, and establishes Y1H as a generalisable assay for the interpretation of variant effects in transcription factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s44320-024-00043-8

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yeast models have been used to screen human disease genes in complementation assays, where the human gene functionally replaces a homologous yeast gene essential for growth, as well as protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions.

    “Yeast models have also been used to screen human disease genes in complementation assays, where the human gene functionally replaces a homologous yeast gene essential for growth (47), as well as protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions (67, 68).”
  • Sequencing the variant library before and after selection can identify damaging variants if they disappear or become progressively less represented under directed evolution.

    “By sequencing the variant library of cells before and after selection, damaging variants can be identified if they disappear or become progressively less represented under these conditions of directed evolution (68).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. Aota S, Nakajima N, Sakamoto R, Watanabe S, Ibaraki N, Okazaki K (2003) Pax6 autoregulation mediated by direct interaction of Pax6 protein with the head surface ectoderm-specific enhancer of the mouse Pax6 gene. Dev Biol 257:1–13 12710953 · DOI
  2. Ashkenazy H, Abadi S, Martz E, Chay O, Mayrose I, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N (2016) ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W344–W350 27166375 PMC4987940 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57:289–300 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Brivanlou AH, Darnell JE (2002) Signal transduction and the control of gene expression. Science 295:813–818 11823631 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brnich SE, Abou Tayoun AN, Couch FJ, Cutting GR, Greenblatt MS, Heinen CD, Kanavy DM, Luo X, McNulty SM, Starita LM et al (2019) Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework. Genome Med 12:3 31892348 PMC6938631 · DOI
  6. Chauhan BK, Zhang W, Cveklova K, Kantorow M, Cvekl A (2002) Identification of differentially expressed genes in mouse Pax6 heterozygous lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1884–1890 12036994 PMC2080866
  7. Chen J, Zhu J (2016) Analysis of PAX6 gene mutations in a Chinese family affected with congenital aniridia. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi Zhonghua Yixue Yichuanxue Zazhi Chin J Med Genet 33:523–525 27455013
  8. Cheng J, Nguyen TYD, Cygan KJ, Çelik MH, Fairbrother WG, Avsec Ž, Gagneur J (2019) MMSplice: modular modeling improves the predictions of genetic variant effects on splicing. Genome Biol 20:48 30823901 PMC6396468 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chi N, Epstein JA (2002) Getting your Pax straight: Pax proteins in development and disease. Trends Genet 18:41–47 11750700 · DOI
  10. Chow RL, Altmann CR, Lang RA, Hemmati-Brivanlou A (1999) Pax6 induces ectopic eyes in a vertebrate. Dev Camb Engl 126:4213–4222 10477290
  11. Coutinho P, Pavlou S, Bhatia S, Chalmers KJ, Kleinjan DA, van Heyningen V (2011) Discovery and assessment of conserved Pax6 target genes and enhancers. Genome Res 21:1349–1359 21617155 PMC3149501 · DOI
  12. Crawford K, Bloom J (2019) alignparse: a Python package for parsing complex features from high-throughput long-read sequencing. J Open Source Softw 4:1915 31897449 PMC6939853 · DOI
  13. Cunha DL, Arno G, Corton M, Moosajee M (2019) The spectrum of PAX6 mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in the eye. Genes 10:1050 31861090 PMC6947179 · DOI
  14. Cvekl A, Callaerts P (2017) PAX6: 25th anniversary and more to learn. Exp Eye Res 156:10–21 27126352 · DOI
  15. Dansault A, David G, Schwartz C, Jaliffa C, Vieira V, de la Houssaye G, Bigot K, Catin F, Tattu L, Chopin C et al (2007) Three new PAX6 mutations including one causing an unusual ophthalmic phenotype associated with neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Mol Vis 13:511 17417613 PMC2649307
  16. Davis J, Piatigorsky J (2011) Overexpression of Pax6 in mouse cornea directly alters corneal epithelial cells: changes in immune function, vascularization, and differentiation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:4158–4168 21447684 PMC3175973 · DOI
  17. Desmet F-O, Hamroun D, Lalande M, Collod-Béroud G, Claustres M, Béroud C (2009) Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Res 37:e67 19339519 PMC2685110 · DOI
  18. Dohrmann C, Gruss P, Lemaire L (2000) Pax genes and the differentiation of hormone-producing endocrine cells in the pancreas. Mech Dev 92:47–54 10704887 · DOI
  19. Epstein J, Cai J, Glaser T, Jepeal L, Maas R (1994) Identification of a Pax paired domain recognition sequence and evidence for DNA-dependent conformational changes. J Biol Chem 269:8355–8361 8132558 · DOI
  20. Esposito D, Weile J, Shendure J, Starita LM, Papenfuss AT, Roth FP, Fowler DM, Rubin AF (2019) MaveDB: an open-source platform to distribute and interpret data from multiplexed assays of variant effect. Genome Biol 20:223 31679514 PMC6827219 · DOI
  21. Faure AJ, Domingo J, Schmiedel JM, Hidalgo-Carcedo C, Diss G, Lehner B (2022) Mapping the energetic and allosteric landscapes of protein binding domains. Nature 604:175–183 35388192 · DOI
  22. Fayer S, Horton C, Dines JN, Rubin AF, Richardson ME, McGoldrick K, Hernandez F, Pesaran T, Karam R, Shirts BH et al (2021) Closing the gap: Systematic integration of multiplexed functional data resolves variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1, TP53, and PTEN. Am J Hum Genet 108:2248–2258 34793697 PMC8715144 · DOI
  23. Ferrer-Costa C, Orozco M, de la Cruz X (2002) Characterization of disease-associated single amino acid polymorphisms in terms of sequence and structure properties. J Mol Biol 315:771–786 11812146 · DOI
  24. Findlay GM, Daza RM, Martin B, Zhang MD, Leith AP, Gasperini M, Janizek JD, Huang X, Starita LM, Shendure J (2018) Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing. Nature 562:217–222 30209399 PMC6181777 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Fowler DM, Adams DJ, Gloyn AL, Hahn WC, Marks DS, Muffley LA, Neal JT, Roth FP, Rubin AF, Starita LM et al (2023) An Atlas of Variant Effects to understand the genome at nucleotide resolution. Genome Biol 24:147 37394429 PMC10316620 · DOI
  26. Fowler DM, Stephany JJ, Fields S (2014) Measuring the activity of protein variants on a large scale using deep mutational scanning. Nat Protoc 9:2267 25167058 PMC4412028 · DOI
  27. Gerasimavicius L, Liu X, Marsh JA (2020) Identification of pathogenic missense mutations using protein stability predictors. Sci Rep 10:1–10 32958805 PMC7506547 · DOI
  28. Giacomelli AO, Yang X, Lintner RE, McFarland JM, Duby M, Kim J, Howard TP, Takeda DY, Ly SH, Kim E et al (2018) Mutational processes shape the landscape of TP53 mutations in human cancer. Nat Genet 50:1381–1387 30224644 PMC6168352 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH (2007) High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc 2:31–34 17401334 · DOI
  30. Gill G, Ptashne M (1988) Negative effect of the transcriptional activator GAL4. Nature 334:721–724 3412449 · DOI
  31. Halder G, Callaerts P, Gehring WJ (1995) Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. Science 67:1788–1792 7892602 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hayashi S, Goto K, Okada TS, Kondoh H (1987) Lens-specific enhancer in the third intron regulates expression of the chicken delta 1-crystallin gene. Genes Dev 1:818–828 2828173 · DOI
  33. Hietpas RT, Jensen JD, Bolon DNA (2011) Experimental illumination of a fitness landscape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:7896–7901 21464309 PMC3093508 · DOI
  34. Ilsley MD, Huang S, Magor GW, Landsberg MJ, Gillinder KR, Perkins AC (2019) Corrupted DNA-binding specificity and ectopic transcription underpin dominant neomorphic mutations in KLF/SP transcription factors. BMC Genomics 20:417 31126231 PMC6534859 · DOI
  35. Inoue M, Kamachi Y, Matsunami H, Imada K, Uchikawa M, Kondoh H (2007) PAX6 and SOX2-dependent regulation of the Sox2 enhancer N-3 involved in embryonic visual system development. Genes Cells 12:1049–1061 17825048 · DOI
  36. Ji X, Wang L, Zang D, Wang Y (2018) Transcription factor-centered yeast one-hybrid assay. Methods Mol Biol 1794:183–194 29855957 · DOI
  37. Jones L, López-Bendito G, Gruss P, Stoykova A, Molnár Z (2002) Pax6 is required for the normal development of the forebrain axonal connections. Development 129:5041–5052 12397112 · DOI
  38. Kamachi Y, Uchikawa M, Tanouchi A, Sekido R, Kondoh H (2001) Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development. Genes Dev 15:1272 11358870 PMC313803 · DOI
  39. Karin M, Smeal T (1992) Control of transcription factors by signal transduction pathways: the beginning of the end. Trends Biochem Sci 17:418–422 1455510 · DOI
  40. Kejun TH, Chao L-Y, Saunders GF (1997) Functional analysis of paired box missense mutations in The PAX6 gene. Hum Mol Genet 6:381–386 9147640 · DOI
  41. King JL, Jukes TH (1969) Non-Darwinian evolution. Science 164:788–798 5767777 · DOI
  42. Kitzman JO, Starita LM, Lo RS, Fields S, Shendure J (2015) Massively parallel single-amino-acid mutagenesis. Nat Methods 12:203–206 25559584 PMC4344410 · DOI
  43. Lambert SA, Jolma A, Campitelli LF, Das PK, Yin Y, Albu M, Chen X, Taipale J, Hughes TR, Weirauch MT (2018) The human transcription factors. Cell 172:650–665 29425488 PMC12908702 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Lee S, Lee SH, Heo H, Oh EH, Shin JH, Kim HS, Jung JH, Choi SY, Choi KD, Lee H et al (2020) Impaired DNA-binding affinity of novel PAX6 mutations. Sci Rep 10:1–10 32080308 PMC7046147
  45. Lee TI, Young RA (2013) Transcriptional regulation and its misregulation in disease. Cell 152:1237–1251 23498934 PMC3640494 · DOI
  46. Li C, Zhi D, Wang K, Liu X (2022) MetaRNN: differentiating rare pathogenic and rare benign missense SNVs and InDels using deep learning. Genome Med 14:115 36209109 PMC9548151 · DOI
  47. Li X, Lalić J, Baeza-Centurion P, Dhar R, Lehner B (2019) Changes in gene expression predictably shift and switch genetic interactions. Nat Commun 10:3886 31467279 PMC6715729 · DOI
  48. Lima Cunha D, Owen N, Tailor V, Corton M, Theodorou M, Moosajee M (2021) PAX6 missense variants in two families with isolated foveal hypoplasia and nystagmus: evidence of paternal postzygotic mosaicism. Eur J Hum Genet 29:349–355 33024313 PMC7868363 · DOI
  49. Liu X, Li C, Mou C, Dong Y, Tu Y (2020) dbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs. Genome Med 12:103 33261662 PMC7709417 · DOI
  50. Livesey BJ, Marsh JA (2020) Using deep mutational scanning to benchmark variant effect predictors and identify disease mutations. Mol Syst Biol 16:e9380 32627955 PMC7336272 · DOI
  51. Livesey BJ, Marsh JA (2022a) The properties of human disease mutations at protein interfaces. PLOS Comput Biol 18:e1009858 35120134 PMC8849535 · DOI
  52. Livesey BJ, Marsh JA (2022b) Interpreting protein variant effects with computational predictors and deep mutational scanning. Dis Model Mech 15:dmm049510 35736673 PMC9235876 · DOI
  53. Livesey BJ, Marsh JA (2023) Updated benchmarking of variant effect predictors using deep mutational scanning. Mol Syst Biol n/a:e11474 PMC10407742 37310135
  54. Manuel M, Pratt T, Liu M, Jeffery G, Price DJ (2008) Overexpression of Pax6 results in microphthalmia, retinal dysplasia and defective retinal ganglion cell axon guidance. BMC Dev Biol 8:59 18507827 PMC2422841 · DOI
  55. Mehlhoff JD, Stearns FW, Rohm D, Wang B, Tsou E-Y, Dutta N, Hsiao M-H, Gonzalez CE, Rubin AF, Ostermeier M (2020) Collateral fitness effects of mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:11597–11607 32385156 PMC7261132 · DOI
  56. Meier J, Rao R, Verkuil R, Liu J, Sercu T, Rives A (2021) Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function. BioRxiv. 10.1101/2021.07.09.450648 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Narasimhan K, Pillay S, Huang YH, Jayabal S, Udayasuryan B, Veerapandian V, Kolatkar P, Cojocaru V, Pervushin K, Jauch R (2015) DNA-mediated cooperativity facilitates the co-selection of cryptic enhancer sequences by SOX2 and PAX6 transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res 43:1513 25578969 PMC4330359 · DOI
  58. Ochi S, Manabe S, Kikkawa T, Osumi N (2022) Thirty years’ history since the discovery of Pax6: from central nervous system development to neurodevelopmental disorders. Int J Mol Sci 23:6115 35682795 PMC9181425 · DOI
  59. Pedersen HR, Hagen LA, Landsend ECS, Gilson SJ, Utheim ØA, Utheim TP, Neitz M, Baraas RC (2018) Color vision in aniridia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:2142–2152 29801149 PMC6110168 · DOI
  60. Pedersen HR, Neitz M, Gilson SJ, Landsend ECS, Utheim ØA, Utheim TP, Baraas RC (2019) The cone photoreceptor mosaic in aniridia: within-family phenotype–genotype discordance. Ophthalmol Retina 3:523–534 31174676 PMC6557282 · DOI
  61. Pejaver V, Urresti J, Lugo-Martinez J, Pagel KA, Lin GN, Nam H-J, Mort M, Cooper DN, Sebat J, Iakoucheva LM et al (2020) Inferring the molecular and phenotypic impact of amino acid variants with MutPred2. Nat Commun 11:5918 33219223 PMC7680112 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Puchta O, Cseke B, Czaja H, Tollervey D, Sanguinetti G, Kudla G (2016) Network of epistatic interactions within a yeast snoRNA. Science 352:840–844 27080103 PMC5137784 · DOI
  63. Redden H, Alper HS (2015) The development and characterization of synthetic minimal yeast promoters. Nat Commun 6:7810 26183606 PMC4518256 · DOI
  64. Reece-Hoyes JS, Diallo A, Lajoie B, Kent A, Shrestha S, Kadreppa S, Pesyna C, Dekker J, Myers CL, Walhout AJM (2011) Enhanced yeast one-hybrid (eY1H) assays for high-throughput gene-centered regulatory network mapping. Nat Methods 8:1059–1064 22037705 PMC3235803 · DOI
  65. Reece-Hoyes JS, Walhout AJM (2012) Yeast one-hybrid assays: a historical and technical perspective. Methods San Diego Calif 57:441–447 22884952 PMC3448804 · DOI
  66. Reva B, Antipin Y, Sander C (2011) Predicting the functional impact of protein mutations: application to cancer genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 39:e118 21727090 PMC3177186 · DOI
  67. Riesselman AJ, Ingraham JB, Marks DS (2018) Deep generative models of genetic variation capture the effects of mutations. Nat Methods 15:816–822 30250057 PMC6693876 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Rubin AF, Gelman H, Lucas N, Bajjalieh SM, Papenfuss AT, Speed TP, Fowler DM (2017) A statistical framework for analyzing deep mutational scanning data. Genome Biol 18:1–15 28784151 PMC5547491 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Sansom SN, Griffiths DS, Faedo A, Kleinjan DJ, Ruan Y, Smith J, Van Heyningen V, Rubenstein JL, Livesey FJ (2009) The level of the transcription factor Pax6 is essential for controlling the balance between neural stem cell self-renewal and neurogenesis. PLOS Genet 5:e1000511 19521500 PMC2686252 · DOI
  70. Schedl A, Ross A, Lee M, Engelkamp D, Rashbass P, Van Heyningen V, Hastie ND (1996) Influence of PAX6 gene dosage on development: overexpression causes severe eye abnormalities. Cell 86:71–82 8689689 · DOI
  71. Spitz F, Furlong EEM (2012) Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nat Rev Genet 13:613–626 22868264 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Staller MV, Holehouse AS, Swain-Lenz D, Das RK, Pappu RV, Cohen BA (2018) A high-throughput mutational scan of an intrinsically disordered acidic transcriptional activation domain. Cell Syst 6:444–455.e6 29525204 PMC5920710 · DOI
  73. Starita LM, Ahituv N, Dunham MJ, Kitzman JO, Roth FP, Seelig G, Shendure J, Fowler DM (2017) Variant interpretation: functional assays to the rescue. Am J Hum Genet 101:315–325 28886340 PMC5590843 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Starr TN, Greaney AJ, Hilton SK, Ellis D, Crawford KHD, Dingens AS, Navarro MJ, Bowen JE, Tortorici MA, Walls AC et al (2020) Deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain reveals constraints on folding and ACE2 binding. Cell 182:1295–1310.e20 32841599 PMC7418704 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Sun J, Rockowitz S, Xie Q, Ashery-Padan R, Zheng D, Cvekl A (2015) Identification of in vivo DNA-binding mechanisms of Pax6 and reconstruction of Pax6-dependent gene regulatory networks during forebrain and lens development. Nucleic Acids Res 43:6827–6846 26138486 PMC4538810 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Tabet D, Parikh V, Mali P, Roth FP, Claussnitzer M (2022) Scalable functional assays for the interpretation of human genetic variation. Annu Rev Genet 56:441–465 36055970 · DOI
  77. Tarilonte M, Morín M, Ramos P, Galdós M, Blanco-Kelly F, Villaverde C, Rey-Zamora D, Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Tahsin-Swafiri S et al (2018) Parental mosaicism in PAX6 causes intra-familial variability: implications for genetic counseling of congenital aniridia and microphthalmia. Front Genet 9:479 30386378 PMC6199369 · DOI
  78. Terzic J, Saraga-Babic M (1999) Expression pattern of PAX3 and PAX6 genes during human embryogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 43:501–508 10610023 · DOI
  79. Thakurela S, Tiwari N, Schick S, Garding A, Ivanek R, Berninger B, Tiwari VK (2016) Mapping gene regulatory circuitry of Pax6 during neurogenesis. Cell Discov 2:1–22 PMC4860964 27462442 · DOI
  80. Thompson B, Davidson EA, Liu W, Nebert DW, Bruford EA, Zhao H, Dermitzakis ET, Thompson DC, Vasiliou V (2021) Overview of PAX gene family: analysis of human tissue-specific variant expression and involvement in human disease. Hum Genet 140:381 32728807 PMC7939107 · DOI
  81. Treisman J, Harris E, Desplan C (1991) The paired box encodes a second DNA-binding domain in the paired homeo domain protein. Genes Dev 5:594–604 1672661 · DOI
  82. Wei H, Li X (2023) Deep mutational scanning: a versatile tool in systematically mapping genotypes to phenotypes. Front Genet 14:1087267 36713072 PMC9878224 · DOI
  83. Williamson KA, Hall HN, Owen LJ, Livesey BJ, Hanson IM, Adams GGW, Bodek S, Calvas P, Castle B, Clarke M et al (2019) Recurrent heterozygous PAX6 missense variants cause severe bilateral microphthalmia via predictable effects on DNA–protein interaction. Genet Med 22:598–609 31700164 PMC7056646 · DOI
  84. Wrenbeck EE, Klesmith JR, Stapleton JA, Adeniran A, Tyo KEJ, Whitehead TA (2016) Plasmid-based one-pot saturation mutagenesis. Nat Methods 13:928–930 27723752 PMC5666567 · DOI
  85. Xu HE, Rould MA, Xu W, Epstein JA, Maas RL, Pabo CO (1999) Crystal structure of the human Pax6 paired domain-DNA complex reveals specific roles for the linker region and carboxy-terminal subdomain in DNA binding. Genes Dev 13:1263–1275 10346815 PMC316729 · DOI
  86. Xu W, Rould MA, Jun S, Desplan C, Pabo CO (1995) Crystal structure of a paired domain-DNA complex at 2.5 å resolution reveals structural basis for pax developmental mutations. Cell 80:639–650 7867071 · DOI
  87. Zabidi MA, Arnold CD, Schernhuber K, Pagani M, Rath M, Frank O, Stark A (2015) Enhancer–core-promoter specificity separates developmental and housekeeping gene regulation. Nature 518:556–559 25517091 PMC6795551 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Zhang T, Dai L, Barton JP, Du Y, Tan Y, Pang W, Chakraborty AK, Lloyd-Smith JO, Sun R (2020) Predominance of positive epistasis among drug resistance-associated mutations in HIV-1 protease. PLoS Genet 16:e1009009 33085662 PMC7605711 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDonnell, A. F., Plech, M., Livesey, B. J., Gerasimavicius, L., Owen, L. J., Hall, H. N., FitzPatrick, D. R., Marsh, J. A., & Kudla, G.
Affiliations
Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
Corresponding author
Kudla, Grzegorz
Venue
Molecular Systems Biology
Published
2024-06-07
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
825-844
ISSN
1744-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399437495
Cited by
16
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Systems Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • UKRI | Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00035/8, MC_UU_00035/9, DTP in Precision Medicine)
  • Wellcome Trust (207507)
  • EC | ERC | HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101001169)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Ocular Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
Pax6, paired domain, DNA binding, aniridia, microphthalmia, coloboma, variant pathogenicity prediction, variant interpretation, gain-of-function mutations, transcription factors, saturation mutagenesis, ACMG/AMP guidelines
MeSH terms
PAX6 Transcription Factor, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA Mutational Analysis, Humans, Mutation, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription Factors, Mutation, Missense, Two-Hybrid System Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review