The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-perceived participation among adults with spinal cord injury: a grounded theory study
Abstract
Study design A grounded theory study of 19 adults with spinal cord injury was conducted. Participants engaged in individual in-depth interviews, and took photographs of aspects of their environment that promoted and restricted participation. Analysis consisted of an inductive process of constant comparison. A focus group with participants was held to discuss and contribute to the credibility of findings. Objectives To develop a theoretical understanding of the influences on self-perceived participation for individuals with SCI. Setting Manitoba, Canada. Results The constructed grounded theory model is summarized as follows: negotiating the body-environment interface is a continuous process for those living with a SCI. Despite the relative stability of their changed body, they live in a changed world, one that is perceived differently after SCI. People use various strategies to interact within their environment, to engage in a process of participation. Intervening conditions are the environmental aspects that serve as barriers or facilitators to this process of participation. Conclusions Study findings lend support to the need for a self-perceived definition of participation. The theory constructed in this study can be used to target interventions intended to improve the participation experiences of individuals with SCI.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Focused codes are more conceptual, and certain focused codes are elevated to abstract categories (Charmaz, 2006; Ripat & Woodgate, 2012).”
From Discriminating among grounded theory approaches (2019) · cites this paper as Ripat & Woodgate, 2012
Citations
Cites
(2006) · Cited by 18,730
Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis
Brink, E., Dellve, L., Hallberg, U., Abrahamsson, K. H., Klingberg, G., & Wentz, K. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being · doi:10.3402/qhw.v1i3.4932 · Cited by 6,862
Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019819702400309 · Cited by 5,551
Chronic illness as biographical disruption
Bury, M. (1982) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11339939 · Cited by 3,960
What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities
Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., Whiteneck, G., Bogner, J., & Rodriguez, E. (2008) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280701625534 · Cited by 645
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4825 · Cited by 444
Whiteneck, G., Meade, M. A., Dijkers, M., Tate, D. G., Bushnik, T., & Forchheimer, M. B. (2004) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.024 · Cited by 334
On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation
Cardol, M., Jong, B. A. D., & Ward, C. D. (2002) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280210151996 · Cited by 316
Issues in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Participation: An Overview
Dijkers, M. P. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.036 · Cited by 276
Accompaniments of chronic illness : changes in body, self, biography, and biographical time
Corbin, J. C. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 272
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dietz ML, Prus RC, Shaffir W . Doing Everyday Life: Ethnography as Human Lived Experience. Copp Clark Longman Ltd.: Missisauga, ON. 1994.
- Semple K, Blowes B, Seggles E, Baptiste S . Inclusive environments: The role of occupational therapy. Occup Ther Now 2010; 12: 16–18.
Cited by
Discriminating among grounded theory approaches
Rieger, K. L. (2019) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.12261 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Ripat, J. D., & Woodgate, R. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ripat, J D
- Venue
- Spinal Cord
- Published
- 2012-07-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 908-914
- ISSN
- 1362-4393 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5624
- OpenAlex
- W1969874508
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Spinal Cord (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Manitoba
- Canadian Occupational Therapy Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, participation strategies, adults with disabilities
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Manitoba, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Spinal Cord Injuries, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-perceived participation among adults with spinal cord injury: a grounded theory study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sc.2012.77
- The paper
- Ripat, J. D., & Woodgate, R. L. (2012). Self-perceived participation among adults with spinal cord injury: a grounded theory study. Spinal Cord. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.77
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.