Cited by 25Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesSpinal Cord Injury ResearchAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies

Use of complementary and alternative medicine in persons with spinal cord injury in Switzerland: a survey study

Pannek, J, Pannek-Rademacher, S, Wöllner, J·2015·Spinal Cord

Abstract

Study design Questionnaire-based survey study.Objectives To evaluate the use of and the satisfaction with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) techniques in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting Rehabilitation Center, Switzerland.Methods Between May and September 2014, all patients with chronic (>1 year) SCI attending the urologic outpatient clinic were asked to fill in a questionnaire regarding the use of CAM.Results Of the 103 participants (66 men and 37 women), 73.8% stated that they have used some form of CAM since SCI, with acupuncture and homeopathy being the two techniques that were used most frequently (31% each). The most common indications for CAM use were pain and urinary tract infections (UTIs). CAM was used supplementarily rather than exclusively. Overall satisfaction (85.1%) as well as satisfaction rates for the different indications (pain: 85%; UTI: 90.5%) and for the most frequently used forms of CAM (homeopathy: 90.6%; acupuncture: 78.1%) were high.Conclusion According to our data, there is a demand for adjunctive CAM procedures for the treatment of medical complications by persons with SCI. CAM led to high satisfaction levels. On the basis of these results, future research should systematically evaluate the therapeutic potential of the most popular CAM techniques, for example, acupuncture and homeopathy, for the treatment of secondary medical complications of SCI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sc.2015.21

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Levels of patient satisfaction were higher in the group using CAM.

    “One recent survey demonstrated that over 70 % of patients with chronic pain had used complementary therapies and that levels of patient satisfaction were higher in the group using CAM [57].”
  • Over 70% of patients with chronic pain had used complementary therapies.

    “One recent survey demonstrated that over 70 % of patients with chronic pain had used complementary therapies and that levels of patient satisfaction were higher in the group using CAM [57].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pannek, J., Pannek-Rademacher, S., & Wöllner, J.
Affiliations
Swiss Paraplegic Center (CH)
Corresponding author
Pannek, J
Venue
Spinal Cord
Published
2015-02-24
Volume
53
Issue
7
Pages
569-572
ISSN
  • 1362-4393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5624
OpenAlex
W1982194236
Cited by
25
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Spinal Cord (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Keywords
spinal cord injury, complementary and alternative medicine, acupuncture, homeopathy, patient satisfaction, pain management, urinary tract infection, urological complications
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Complementary Therapies, Female, Homeopathy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Spinal Cord Injuries, Switzerland, Urinary Tract Infections, Acupuncture Therapy, Patient Satisfaction, Health Care Surveys, Young Adult, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review