Cited by 310Animal Behavior and ReproductionNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Monogamy and the Prairie Vole

Carter, C. Sue, Getz, Lowell L.·1993·Scientific American

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/scientificamerican0693-100

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Carter, C. S., & Getz, L. L.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Scientific American
Published
1993-06
Volume
268
Issue
6
Pages
100-106
ISSN
0036-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991551843
Cited by
310
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientific American (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
monogamy, Microtus ochrogaster, pair bonding, social behavior, animal behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Arvicolinae, Female, Male, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Gonadal Steroid Hormones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review