Cited by 132Animal Behavior and ReproductionNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorMarriage and Sexual Relationships

Social but not genetic monogamy is associated with greater breeding success in prairie voles

Ophir, Alexander G., Phelps, Steven M., Sorin, Anna Bess, Wolff, Jerry O.·2008·Animal Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.022

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pair-bonded prairie voles exhibit aggression towards extra-pair individuals to aid in pair bond maintenance.

    “Interestingly, pair-bonded prairie voles similarly exhibit aggression towards extra-pair individuals to aid in pair bond maintenance.”
  • Although prairie voles are socially monogamous, they are not exclusively sexually monogamous, with some males and females seeking out extra-pair copulations.

    “Although prairie voles are socially monogamous, they are not exclusively sexually monogamous, with some males and females seeking out extra-pair copulations [151,152].”
  • Between 23-56% of prairie vole litters are sired by multiple males.

    “Thus, despite the notoriety that prairie voles receive for their monogamous behavior, genetic determination of paternity in natural and semi-natural populations has revealed that between 23–56% of litters are sired by multiple males [59, 60].”
  • Genetic monogamy in which a male-female pair cohabitate and share exclusive parentage of offspring is often not the norm in prairie voles.

    “Although prairie voles are considered socially monogamous, genetic monogamy in which a male-female pair cohabitate and share exclusive parentage of offspring, is often not the norm.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ophir, A. G., Phelps, S. M., Sorin, A. B., & Wolff, J. O.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • St. Cloud State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ophir, Alexander G.
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
1143-1154
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104241782
Cited by
132
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
Microtus ochrogaster, social monogamy, genetic monogamy, extra-pair paternity, breeding success, mating systems, sexual fidelity, social attachment, space use, paternity, microsatellite markers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review