Cited by 617Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: The prairie vole model

Sue Carter, C., Courtney Devries, A., Getz, Lowell L.·1995·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) are described here as a model system in which it is possible to examine, within the context of natural history, the proximate processes regulating the social and reproductive behaviors that characterize a monogamous social system. Neuropeptides, including oxytocin and vasopressin, and the adrenal glucocorticoid, corticosterone, have been implicated in the neural regulation of partner preferences, and in the male, vasopressin has been implicated in the induction of selective aggression toward strangers. We hypothesize here that interactions among oxytocin, vasopressin and glucocorticoids could provide substrates for dynamic changes in social and agonistic behaviors, including those required in the development and expression of monogamy. Results from research with voles suggest that the behaviors characteristics of monogamy, including social attachments and biparental care, may be modified by hormones during development and may be regulated by different mechanisms in males and females.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0149-7634(94)00070-h

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 122 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sue Carter, C., Courtney Devries, A., & Getz, L. L.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
303-314
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167611756
Cited by
615
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 28
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh045836-03, 5r01hd009328-11)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 45836)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD16679, HD 09328)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
Microtus ochrogaster, monogamy, oxytocin, vasopressin, corticosterone, glucocorticoids, mate preferences, social attachment, biparental care, agonistic behavior, social behavior, neuropeptides, sex differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Arvicolinae, Female, Male, Models, Psychological, Pair Bond, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Gonadal Steroid Hormones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review