Cited by 12

Book Review

Gould, Stephen Jay·1992·Scientific American

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/scientificamerican0792-118

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scientists who are familiar with the philosophy of science such as Stephen Jay Gould have not made this error when pointing out the many problems with Johnson's work.

    “Scientists who are familiar with the philosophy of science such as Stephen Jay Gould have not made this error when pointing out the many problems with Johnson's work (32).”

    From Creationism and intelligent design. (2003) · cites this paper as [32]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gould, S. J.
Corresponding author
Gould, Stephen Jay
Venue
Scientific American
Published
1992-07
Volume
267
Issue
1
Pages
118-121
ISSN
0036-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4253308469
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scientific American (publishedVersion)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review