Cited by 296Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceFree Will and AgencyPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Problem of Consciousness

Crick, Francis, Koch, Christof·1992·Scientific American

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/scientificamerican0992-152

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 289

Metadata

Authors
Crick, F., & Koch, C.
Affiliations
Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Venue
Scientific American
Published
1992-09
Volume
267
Issue
3
Pages
152-159
ISSN
0036-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035398667
Cited by
296
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
25.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientific American (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
Keywords
consciousness, mind-body problem, philosophy of mind
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Consciousness, Humans, Optical Illusions, Vision, Ocular, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review