Cited by 305Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceFree Will and AgencyCognitive Science and Education Research

The Puzzle of Conscious Experience

Open access
Chalmers, David J.·1995·Scientific American

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/scientificamerican1295-80

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Any theory such as IIT which rejects computational functionalism is vulnerable to fading/dancing qualia arguments.

    “Any theory such as IIT which rejects computational functionalism is vulnerable to one of the strongest arguments in philosophy of mind: fading/dancing qualia.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chalmers, D. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Chalmers, David J.
Venue
Scientific American
Published
1995-12
Volume
273
Issue
6
Pages
80-86
ISSN
0036-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981812544
Cited by
305
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 26
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific American (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
consciousness, subjective experience, self-awareness, neural correlates of consciousness, mind-brain relationship, neuroscience of consciousness
MeSH terms
Behavior, Brain, Computer Simulation, Consciousness, Humans, Models, Biological, Neurons, Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review