The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A note on competing risks in survival data analysis
Open accessAbstract
Survival analysis encompasses investigation of time to event data. In most clinical studies, estimating the cumulative incidence function (or the probability of experiencing an event by a given time) is of primary interest. When the data consist of patients who experience an event and censored individuals, a nonparametric estimate of the cumulative incidence can be obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method. Under this approach, the censoring mechanism is assumed to be noninformative. In other words, the survival time of an individual (or the time at which a subject experiences an event) is assumed to be independent of a mechanism that would cause the patient to be censored. Often times, a patient may experience an event other than the one of interest which alters the probability of experiencing the event of interest. Such events are known as competing risk events. In this setting, it would often be of interest to calculate the cumulative incidence of a specific event of interest. Any subject who does not experience the event of interest can be treated as censored. However, a patient experiencing a competing risk event is censored in an informative manner. Hence, the Kaplan-Meier estimation procedure may not be directly applicable. The cumulative incidence function for an event of interest must be calculated by appropriately accounting for the presence of competing risk events. In this paper, we illustrate nonparametric estimation of the cumulative incidence function for an event of interest in the presence of competing risk events using two published data sets. We compare the resulting estimates with those obtained using the Kaplan-Meier approach to demonstrate the importance of appropriately estimating the cumulative incidence of an event of interest in the presence of competing risk events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data.
Aitkin, M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530581 · Cited by 9,877
A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing Risk
Gray, R. J. (1988) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176350951 · Cited by 4,960
The Analysis of Failure Times in the Presence of Competing Risks
Prentice, R. L., Kalbfleisch, J. D., Peterson, A. V., Flournoy, N., Farewell, V. T., & Breslow, N. E. (1978) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530374 · Cited by 1,266
Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research
Collett, D. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3115-3 · Cited by 1,065
Survival Analysis Part I: Basic concepts and first analyses
Clark, T. G., Bradburn, M. J., Love, S. B., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601118 · Cited by 1,030
Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research.
McLachlan, G. J., & Collett, D. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533471 · Cited by 1,021
Cited by
Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks
Austin, P. C., Lee, D. S., & Fine, J. P. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.017719 · Cited by 2,653
An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival
Del Valle, D. M., Kim-Schulze, S., Huang, H.-H., Beckmann, N. D., Nirenberg, S., Wang, B., Lavin, Y., Swartz, T. H., Madduri, D., Stock, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1051-9 · Cited by 2,605
Competing risk analysis using R: an easy guide for clinicians
Scrucca, L., Santucci, A., & Aversa, F. (2007) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1705727 · Cited by 699
Improving caregiver well-being delays nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease
Mittelman, M. S., Haley, W. E., Clay, O. J., & Roth, D. L. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000242727.81172.91 · Cited by 602
Competing Risk of Death: An Important Consideration in Studies of Older Adults
Berry, S. D., Ngo, L., Samelson, E. J., & Kiel, D. P. (2010) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Satagopan, J. M., Ben-Porat, L., Berwick, M., Robson, M., Kutler, D., & Auerbach, A. D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2004-08-10
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1229-1235
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2004009085
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 13.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A note on competing risks in survival data analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602102
- The paper
- Satagopan, J. M., Ben-Porat, L., Berwick, M., Robson, M., Kutler, D., & Auerbach, A. D. (2004). A note on competing risks in survival data analysis. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.