Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 593

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Competing Risk of Death: An Important Consideration in Studies of Older Adults

Open access
Berry, Sarah D., Ngo, Long, Samelson, Elizabeth J., Kiel, Douglas P.·2010·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Clinical studies often face the difficult problem of how to account for participants who die without experiencing the study outcome of interest. In a geriatric population with considerable comorbidities, the competing risk of death is especially high. Traditional approaches to describe risk of disease include Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression, but these methods can overestimate risk of disease by failing to account for the competing risk of death. This report discusses traditional survival analysis and competing risk analysis as used to estimate risk of disease in geriatric studies. Furthermore, it illustrates a competing risk approach to estimate risk of second hip fracture in the Framingham Osteoporosis Study and compares the results with traditional survival analysis. In this example, survival analysis overestimated the 5‐year risk of second hip fracture by 37% and the 10‐year risk by 75% compared with competing risk estimates. In studies of older individuals in which a substantial number of participants die during a long follow‐up, the cumulative incidence competing risk estimate and competing risk regression should be used to determine incidence and effect estimates. Use of a competing risk approach is critical to accurately determining disease risk for elderly individuals and therefore best inform clinical decision‐making.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 593

Metadata

Authors
Berry, S. D., Ngo, L., Samelson, E. J., & Kiel, D. P.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
783-787
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1567051068
Cited by
593
References
15
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competing Risk of Death: An Important Consideration in Studies of Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x
The paper
Berry, S. D., Ngo, L., Samelson, E. J., & Kiel, D. P. (2010). Competing Risk of Death: An Important Consideration in Studies of Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.