Cited by 114Photodynamic Therapy Research StudiesPorphyrin Metabolism and DisordersNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methotrexate used in combination with aminolaevulinic acid for photodynamic killing of prostate cancer cells

Open access
Sinha, A K, Anand, S, Ortel, B J, Chang, Y, Mai, Z, Hasan, T, Maytin, E V·2006·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) to drive production of an intracellular photosensitiser, protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), is a promising cancer treatment. However, ALA-PDT is still suboptimal for thick or refractory tumours. Searching for new approaches, we tested a known inducer of cellular differentiation, methotrexate (MTX), in combination with ALA-PDT in LNCaP cells. Methotrexate alone promoted growth arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis. Methotrexate pretreatment (1 mg l(-1), 72 h) followed by ALA (0.3 mM, 4 h) resulted in a three-fold increase in intracellular PpIX, by biochemical and confocal analyses. After exposure to 512 nm light, killing was significantly enhanced in MTX-preconditioned cells. The reverse order of treatments, ALA-PDT followed by MTX, yielded no enhancement. Methotrexate caused a similar relative increase in PpIX, whether cells were incubated with ALA, methyl-ALA, or hexyl-ALA, arguing against a major effect upon ALA transport. Searching for an effect among porphyrin synthetic enzymes, we found that coproporphyrinogen oxidase (CPO) was increased three-fold by MTX at the mRNA and protein levels. Transfection of LNCaP cells with a CPO-expressing vector stimulated the accumulation of PpIX. Our data suggest that MTX, when used to modulate intracellular production of endogenous PpIX, may provide a new combination PDT approach for certain cancers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603273

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Methotrexate pretreatment stimulates the accumulation of PpIX in LNCaP cells. LNCaP cells, seeded in 35 mm dishes 1 day previously, were incubated in culture medium containing MTX (1 mg l−1; +MTX), or in medium without additives (−MTX). After 72 h, ALA was added to some of the dishes (0.3 mM, +ALA; middle and right panels) and the cells were incubated for an additional 4 h. Protoporphyrin IX-specific fluorescence was analysed by fluorescence microscopy (see Materials and Methods). Upper panels: phase-contrast images. Lower panels: PpIX-fluorescent images. Scale bar, 50 μm.
Figure 1 Methotrexate pretreatment stimulates the accumulation of PpIX in LNCaP cells. LNCaP cells, seeded in 35 mm dishes 1 day previously, were incubated in culture medium containing MTX (1 mg l−1; +MTX), or in medium without additives (−MTX). After 72 h, ALA was added to some of the dishes (0.3 mM, +ALA; middle and right panels) and the cells were incubated for an additional 4 h. Protoporphyrin IX-specific fluorescence was analysed by fluorescence microscopy (see Materials and Methods). Upper panels: phase-contrast images. Lower panels: PpIX-fluorescent images. Scale bar, 50 μm.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Effect of MTX upon LNCaP growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. (A) Inhibition of cell growth by MTX. LNCaP cells were incubated for 72 h in medium containing 1 mg l−1 MTX, or solvent alone (control). Proliferation is indicated by a 350% net increase in cell number at 72 h vs no increase with MTX. Mean of two experiments carried out in duplicate, ±s.d. (B) Western blots of LNCaP cells incubated in the presence of MTX, and analysed with specific antisera to growth arrest marker (p27/kip-1; upper panel) and a differentiation marker (E-cadherin; lower panels). The upper panels show a time course of induction at a fixed MTX concentration (1 mg l−1); the lower panel shows a dose–response study with a fixed incubation time of 72 h. The E-cadherin doublet at 124 and 135 kDa (lower panel; Bis–Tris gel) was not well resolved on the smaller, Tris-glycine gel (middle panel). (C) Analysis of apoptosis in LNCaP cells after incubation with MTX. Cells were incubated for 72 h in the presence or absence of MTX, as indicated. Adherent and nonadherent cells were pooled and analysed by FACS analysis. The sub-G1 fraction (apoptotic cells, closed bars) and the G1+S+G2/M fractions (living cells, open bars) were expressed as a percentage of total cell number. Bars show mean of six experiments±s.d.
Figure 2 Effect of MTX upon LNCaP growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. (A) Inhibition of cell growth by MTX. LNCaP cells were incubated for 72 h in medium containing 1 mg l−1 MTX, or solvent alone (control). Proliferation is indicated by a 350% net increase in cell number at 72 h vs no increase with MTX. Mean of two experiments carried out in duplicate, ±s.d. (B) Western blots of LNCaP cells incubated in the presence of MTX, and analysed with specific antisera to growth arrest marker (p27/kip-1; upper panel) and a differentiation marker (E-cadherin; lower panels). The upper panels show a time course of induction at a fixed MTX concentration (1 mg l−1); the lower panel shows a dose–response study with a fixed incubation time of 72 h. The E-cadherin doublet at 124 and 135 kDa (lower panel; Bis–Tris gel) was not well resolved on the smaller, Tris-glycine gel (middle panel). (C) Analysis of apoptosis in LNCaP cells after incubation with MTX. Cells were incubated for 72 h in the presence or absence of MTX, as indicated. Adherent and nonadherent cells were pooled and analysed by FACS analysis. The sub-G1 fraction (apoptotic cells, closed bars) and the G1+S+G2/M fractions (living cells, open bars) were expressed as a percentage of total cell number. Bars show mean of six experiments±s.d.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Effect of MTX upon ALA-mediated PpIX accumulation. (A) Pretreatment of LNCaP cells with MTX enhances ALA-induced PpIX accumulation. Cells were cultured in the presence of MTX (1 mg l−1; grey bar) for 72 h, then ALA (0.3 mM) was added for 4 h, and cells harvested for measurements of intracellular PpIX. For a positive control, some dishes were incubated with an androgen, R1881 (0.1 μM; black bar) for 72 h. Protoporphyrin IX concentrations, calculated from a standard curve, were expressed on a per cell basis. Bars are the mean of eight experiments±s.e.m. (*), two-sample t-test, P<0.001. (B) Methotrexate enhances PpIX accumulation in LNCaP cells over a range of ALA concentrations. Cells were pretreated with MTX (open circles) or medium alone (solid circles) for 72 h, then incubated for 4 h in different ALA concentrations before harvest. This experiment shows mean±range of duplicate determinations at each point. Two additional experiments gave qualitatively similar results (not shown). (Inset) Enlargement of the graph at 0.3 mM ALA; note that MTX enhancement of PpIX occurred even at the lowest ALA dose. (Asterisks) Two-sample t-test, comparing MTX to control at the same dose of ALA; (*) P<0.05; (**) P<0.001. (C) Effect of MTX upon accumulation of PpIX derived from different ALA esters. Cells were incubated for 72 h in the absence or presence of MTX, and then for 4 h in the presence of either ALA (0.3 mM), methyl-ALA (0.5 mM), or hexyl-ALA (1 μM) before harvest and PpIX measurement. Bars are the mean±s.e.m. for three experiments, each performed in duplicate. Numbers above each bracket indicate relative increase (-fold) in PpIX owing to MTX. Note the similar -fold increase with all three analogues.
Figure 3 Effect of MTX upon ALA-mediated PpIX accumulation. (A) Pretreatment of LNCaP cells with MTX enhances ALA-induced PpIX accumulation. Cells were cultured in the presence of MTX (1 mg l−1; grey bar) for 72 h, then ALA (0.3 mM) was added for 4 h, and cells harvested for measurements of intracellular PpIX. For a positive control, some dishes were incubated with an androgen, R1881 (0.1 μM; black bar) for 72 h. Protoporphyrin IX concentrations, calculated from a standard curve, were expressed on a per cell basis. Bars are the mean of eight experiments±s.e.m. (*), two-sample t-test, P<0.001. (B) Methotrexate enhances PpIX accumulation in LNCaP cells over a range of ALA concentrations. Cells were pretreated with MTX (open circles) or medium alone (solid circles) for 72 h, then incubated for 4 h in different ALA concentrations before harvest. This experiment shows mean±range of duplicate determinations at each point. Two additional experiments gave qualitatively similar results (not shown). (Inset) Enlargement of the graph at 0.3 mM ALA; note that MTX enhancement of PpIX occurred even at the lowest ALA dose. (Asterisks) Two-sample t-test, comparing MTX to control at the same dose of ALA; (*) P<0.05; (**) P<0.001. (C) Effect of MTX upon accumulation of PpIX derived from different ALA esters. Cells were incubated for 72 h in the absence or presence of MTX, and then for 4 h in the presence of either ALA (0.3 mM), methyl-ALA (0.5 mM), or hexyl-ALA (1 μM) before harvest and PpIX measurement. Bars are the mean±s.e.m. for three experiments, each performed in duplicate. Numbers above each bracket indicate relative increase (-fold) in PpIX owing to MTX. Note the similar -fold increase with all three analogues.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Pretreatment of LNCaP cells with MTX enhances cytotoxicity after the addition of ALA and light. Survival was measured by MTT dye conversion (A and B) or by colony formation (C and D), and presented in two ways. Raw data from a single, typical experiment are shown (A and C), followed by the per cent survival (relative to unirradiated controls), pooled from multiple experiments (B and D). In all cases, cells were preconditioned for 72 h with MTX (1 mg l−1; triangles) or medium alone (circles), then incubated with ALA (0.3 mM) for 4 h and irradiated with light. (A) MTT dye assay at 24 h, single experiment. (B) MTT dye assay, pooled experiments. Mean±s.e.m. of four experiments. (*), P<0.05. (C) Colony formation assay at 13-day, single experiment. (D) Colony formation assay at 13-day, pooled experiments. Mean±s.e.m. of four experiments. (**), P<0.0005. See Materials and Methods and Results for further details.
Figure 4 Pretreatment of LNCaP cells with MTX enhances cytotoxicity after the addition of ALA and light. Survival was measured by MTT dye conversion (A and B) or by colony formation (C and D), and presented in two ways. Raw data from a single, typical experiment are shown (A and C), followed by the per cent survival (relative to unirradiated controls), pooled from multiple experiments (B and D). In all cases, cells were preconditioned for 72 h with MTX (1 mg l−1; triangles) or medium alone (circles), then incubated with ALA (0.3 mM) for 4 h and irradiated with light. (A) MTT dye assay at 24 h, single experiment. (B) MTT dye assay, pooled experiments. Mean±s.e.m. of four experiments. (*), P<0.05. (C) Colony formation assay at 13-day, single experiment. (D) Colony formation assay at 13-day, pooled experiments. Mean±s.e.m. of four experiments. (**), P<0.0005. See Materials and Methods and Results for further details.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Photodynamic therapy is not enhanced if MTX is administered after ALA and light. Cells were first subjected to ALA-PDT treatment (4 h of ALA 0.3 mM, followed by exposure to graduated light doses) and plated for colony formation assay. Subsequently, one set of plates was exposed to MTX for 72 h, the other to medium only. Colonies were counted at 13 days. (A) Colony formation assay, single experiment. (B) Colony formation assay, pooled experiments. Mean of four experiments±s.e.m.
Figure 5 Photodynamic therapy is not enhanced if MTX is administered after ALA and light. Cells were first subjected to ALA-PDT treatment (4 h of ALA 0.3 mM, followed by exposure to graduated light doses) and plated for colony formation assay. Subsequently, one set of plates was exposed to MTX for 72 h, the other to medium only. Colonies were counted at 13 days. (A) Colony formation assay, single experiment. (B) Colony formation assay, pooled experiments. Mean of four experiments±s.e.m.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Very low concentrations of MTX can enhance PpIX in LNCaP cells. At time zero, LNCaP cells (3 × 105 cells dish−1) were plated on glass cover slips as described in Materials and Methods, and at 24 h, switched to medium containing variable quantities of MTX (0.001–1.0 mg l−1). At 72 h, new medium with 1 mM ALA was added and cells were incubated for 4 h before visualisation of PpIX-specific fluorescence by confocal microscopy. (A–D) Representative images (shown here in grey scale) of PpIX-specific fluorescence in LNCaP cells at the MTX concentrations indicated. (E) Semiquantitative analysis of the relative number of cells that were PpIX-positive (% of total cells), performed as described in Materials and Methods. Bars are the mean±s.d. of three digital images per transfection. (*) P<0.001; (**) P<0.0005. The experiment was performed twice with similar results.
Figure 6 Very low concentrations of MTX can enhance PpIX in LNCaP cells. At time zero, LNCaP cells (3 × 105 cells dish−1) were plated on glass cover slips as described in Materials and Methods, and at 24 h, switched to medium containing variable quantities of MTX (0.001–1.0 mg l−1). At 72 h, new medium with 1 mM ALA was added and cells were incubated for 4 h before visualisation of PpIX-specific fluorescence by confocal microscopy. (A–D) Representative images (shown here in grey scale) of PpIX-specific fluorescence in LNCaP cells at the MTX concentrations indicated. (E) Semiquantitative analysis of the relative number of cells that were PpIX-positive (% of total cells), performed as described in Materials and Methods. Bars are the mean±s.d. of three digital images per transfection. (*) P<0.001; (**) P<0.0005. The experiment was performed twice with similar results.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Demonstration that MTX treatment leads to increased levels of CPO. (A) Methotrexate treatment of LNCaP cells causes accumulation of CPO mRNA. Cells were exposed for various times to MTX (1 mg l−1), or remained untreated (0 h). Cells were lysed, cDNA prepared, and RT–PCR performed using a CPO gene-specific primer set, as described in Materials and Methods. The resulting PCR product was confirmed by DNA sequencing and by size-similarity to a known plasmid cDNA (not shown). The ethidium-stained, CPO-specific bands are shown here inverted (dark bands). G3PDH, invariant control. (B) Semiquantitative analysis of CPO mRNA. Agarose gels were digitally photographed, and the integrated density of each band measured using NIH Image software. Induction (relative to untreated controls) was calculated after background subtraction and normalisation to the G3PDH bands. Mean±range of two experiments. (C, left side) The anti-CPO epitope antibody recognises full-length CPO protein. Lysates from cos-7 cells were transfected with a plasmid vector (pCPO) expressing CPO inserted in either the sense (S) or antisense (AS) orientation, and analysed by Western blot using the antiserum to CPO. Arrow: CPO-specific signal; NS, nonspecific. (C, right side) CPO is expressed in LNCaP cells and increases with MTX treatment. Equal amounts of protein from lysed cells were separated on acrylamide gels, and immunoblotted with antibodies to CPO, prostate-specific antigen, or actin. The 38 kDa CPO protein is indicated. (D) Semiquantitative analysis of CPO protein. Western blots from experiments examining long and short times of exposure to MTX were scanned densitometrically, and the data combined. Error bars: range of duplicate experiments. (E) Fluorescence images, captured from LNCaP cells that were either not transfected (No DNA), transfected with an empty pcDNA3.1 vector (Vector only), or transfected with different amounts of a plasmid vector overexpressing CPO, followed by incubation with ALA and analysis of the PpIX-specific signal by confocal microscopy. The PpIX-specific signal is shown in grey scale. (F) Semiquantitative analysis of relative PpIX-positive cells (% of total cells) was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Bars represent the mean±s.d. of three images from each of two dishes; Asterisks, P<0.0005 relative to the vector-only control.
Figure 7 Demonstration that MTX treatment leads to increased levels of CPO. (A) Methotrexate treatment of LNCaP cells causes accumulation of CPO mRNA. Cells were exposed for various times to MTX (1 mg l−1), or remained untreated (0 h). Cells were lysed, cDNA prepared, and RT–PCR performed using a CPO gene-specific primer set, as described in Materials and Methods. The resulting PCR product was confirmed by DNA sequencing and by size-similarity to a known plasmid cDNA (not shown). The ethidium-stained, CPO-specific bands are shown here inverted (dark bands). G3PDH, invariant control. (B) Semiquantitative analysis of CPO mRNA. Agarose gels were digitally photographed, and the integrated density of each band measured using NIH Image software. Induction (relative to untreated controls) was calculated after background subtraction and normalisation to the G3PDH bands. Mean±range of two experiments. (C, left side) The anti-CPO epitope antibody recognises full-length CPO protein. Lysates from cos-7 cells were transfected with a plasmid vector (pCPO) expressing CPO inserted in either the sense (S) or antisense (AS) orientation, and analysed by Western blot using the antiserum to CPO. Arrow: CPO-specific signal; NS, nonspecific. (C, right side) CPO is expressed in LNCaP cells and increases with MTX treatment. Equal amounts of protein from lysed cells were separated on acrylamide gels, and immunoblotted with antibodies to CPO, prostate-specific antigen, or actin. The 38 kDa CPO protein is indicated. (D) Semiquantitative analysis of CPO protein. Western blots from experiments examining long and short times of exposure to MTX were scanned densitometrically, and the data combined. Error bars: range of duplicate experiments. (E) Fluorescence images, captured from LNCaP cells that were either not transfected (No DNA), transfected with an empty pcDNA3.1 vector (Vector only), or transfected with different amounts of a plasmid vector overexpressing CPO, followed by incubation with ALA and analysis of the PpIX-specific signal by confocal microscopy. The PpIX-specific signal is shown in grey scale. (F) Semiquantitative analysis of relative PpIX-positive cells (% of total cells) was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Bars represent the mean±s.d. of three images from each of two dishes; Asterisks, P<0.0005 relative to the vector-only control.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 Schematic of porphyrin-synthetic pathway to illustrate potential control points for increased PpIX accumulation. Enzymes, with names abbreviated and relative locations in the pathway shown in boxes, are numbered beginning with the initial condensation of glycine and succinyl-CoA. Substrates/products are shown in bold font. The intracellular location of enzymes, relative to the mitochondria and the cytoplasm, is indicated. See Bickers et al (1999) for a fully detailed version.
Figure 8 Schematic of porphyrin-synthetic pathway to illustrate potential control points for increased PpIX accumulation. Enzymes, with names abbreviated and relative locations in the pathway shown in boxes, are numbered beginning with the initial condensation of glycine and succinyl-CoA. Substrates/products are shown in bold font. The intracellular location of enzymes, relative to the mitochondria and the cytoplasm, is indicated. See Bickers et al (1999) for a fully detailed version.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 114

Metadata

Authors
Sinha, A. K., Anand, S., Ortel, B. J., Chang, Y., Mai, Z., Hasan, T., & Maytin, E. V.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Maytin, E V
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2006-07-25
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
485-495
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W1994983260
Cited by
114
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kansai Medical University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • National Cancer Institute (P01 CA84203, P01CA084203)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Keywords
methotrexate, 5-aminolevulinic acid, photodynamic therapy, prostate cancer, protoporphyrin IX, coproporphyrinogen oxidase, LNCaP cells, combination therapy, porphyrin synthesis, apoptosis, cell differentiation
MeSH terms
Aminolevulinic Acid, Cell Differentiation, Cell Survival, Coproporphyrinogen Oxidase, Humans, Male, Methotrexate, Models, Biological, Photochemotherapy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Protoporphyrins, Metribolone, Up-Regulation, Apoptosis, Photosensitizing Agents, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review