Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term survival after epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil for gastric cancer: results of a randomized trial

Open access
Waters, J S, Norman, A, Cunningham, D, Scarffe, J H, Webb, A, Harper, P, Joffe, J K, Mackean, M, Mansi, J, Leahy, M, Hill, A, Oates, J, Rao, S, Nicolson, M, Hickish, T·1999·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

We report the final results of a prospectively randomized study that compared the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and protracted venous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) (ECF regimen) with the standard combination of 5-FU, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) in previously untreated patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer. Between 1992 and 1995, 274 patients with adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma were randomized from eight oncology centres in the UK and analysed for response and survival. The overall response rate was 46% (95% confidence interval (CI), 37-55%) with ECF, and 21% (95% CI, 13-28%) with FAMTX (P = 0.00003). The median survival was 8.7 months with ECF and 6.1 months with FAMTX (P = 0.0005). The 2-year survival rates were 14% (95% CI, 8-20%) for the ECF arm, and 5% (95% CI, 2-10%) for the FAMTX arm (P = 0.03). Histologically complete surgical resection following chemotherapy was achieved in ten patients in the ECF arm (three pathological complete responses to chemotherapy) and three patients in the FAMTX arm (no pathological complete responses). The ECF regimen resulted in a response and survival advantage compared with FAMTX chemotherapy. The probability of long-term survival following surgical resection of residual disease is increased by this treatment. The high response rates seen with ECF support its use in the neoadjuvant setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690350

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Waters, J. S., Norman, A., Cunningham, D., Scarffe, J. H., Webb, A., Harper, P., Joffe, J. K., Mackean, M., Mansi, J., Leahy, M., Hill, A., Oates, J., Rao, S., Nicolson, M., & Hickish, T.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
1999-03-26
Volume
80
Issue
1-2
Pages
269-272
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W1981480220
Cited by
275
References
15
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term survival after epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil for gastric cancer: results of a randomized trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690350
The paper
Waters, J. S., Norman, A., Cunningham, D., Scarffe, J. H., Webb, A., Harper, P., Joffe, J. K., Mackean, M., Mansi, J., Leahy, M., Hill, A., Oates, J., Rao, S., Nicolson, M., & Hickish, T. (1999). Long-term survival after epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil for gastric cancer: results of a randomized trial. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690350

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.