Cited by 61Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsDrug Solubulity and Delivery Systems

The antihypertensive effect of orally administered nifedipine‐loaded nanoparticles in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Open access
Kim, Young Il, Fluckiger, Laurence, Hoffman, Maurice, Lartaud‐Idjouadiene, Isabelle, Atkinson, Jeffrey, Maincent, Thilippe·1997·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

The therapeutic use of nifedipine is limited by the rapidity of the onset of its action and its short biological half‐life. In order to produce a form devoid of these disadvantages we made nanoparticles of nifedipine from three different polymers, poly‐ɛ‐caprolactone (PCL), polylactic and glycolic acid (1:1) copolymers (PLAGA), and Eudragit RL/RS (Eudragit). Nifedipine in polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG) solution was used as a control. The average diameters of the nanoparticles ranged from 0.12 to 0.21 μm; the encapsulation ratio was 82% to 88%. In spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), the initial rapid fall in systolic arterial blood pressure following oral administration of nifedipine in PEG solution (from 193 ± 3 to 102 ± 2 mmHg) was not seen following administration of the same dose in Eudragit nanoparticles (from 189 ± 2 to 156 ± 2 mmHg); with PCL and PLAGA nanoparticles the initial fall in blood pressure was significantly reduced (nadirs PCL 124 ± 2 and PLAGA 113 ± 2 mmHg). Ten hours following administration, blood pressure in rats administered the nifedipine/PEG preparation had returned to normal (183 ± 3 mmHg) whereas that of animals given nifedipine in nanoparticles (PCL 170 ±3, PLAGA 168 ± 2, Eudragit 160 ±3 mmHg) was still significantly reduced. All of the nanoparticle dosage forms decreased C max and increased T max and the mean residence time (MRT) values. Relative bioavailability was significantly increased with Eudragit nanoparticles compared to the nifedipine/PEG solution. There was an inverse linear correlation between the fall in blood pressure and plasma nifedipine concentration with all preparations. The nanoparticle nifedipine preparations represent sustained release forms with increased bioavailability, a less pronounced initial antihypertensive effect and a long‐lasting action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0700910

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nifedipine encapsulated in PLGA, PCL, and eudragit nanoparticles produced significant and sustained reduction in blood pressure.

    “In another study, Kim et al. reported a significant and sustained reduction in blood pressure using nifedipine encapsulated in PLGA, PCL, and eudragit nanoparticles.143”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. GILLEY, R.M., ELDRIDGE, J.H., OPITZ, J.L., HANNA, L.K., STAAS, J.K. & TICE, T.R. (1988). Development of secretory and systemic immunity following oral administration of microencapsulated antigens. Proc. Int. Sym. Control. Rel. Bioac. Mat., 15, 123 ± 124.
  2. MAINCENT, P., FLUCKIGER, L., LEROUEIL, M., HOFFMAN, M. & ATKINSON, J. (1994). Interest of colloidal carriers as vectors of antihypertensive dihydropyridine calcium-entry blockers to decrease blood pressure in hypertensive rats. Proc. Int. Sym. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mat., 21, 33 ± 34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y. I., Fluckiger, L., Hoffman, M., Lartaud‐Idjouadiene, I., Atkinson, J., & Maincent, T.
Affiliations
Université Henri Poincaré (FR)
Corresponding author
Maincent, Thilippe
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-01
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
399-404
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2087338639
Cited by
61
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Keywords
nifedipine, nanoparticles, antihypertensive effect, sustained drug release, polycaprolactone, Eudragit, oral bioavailability, blood pressure, spontaneously hypertensive rats, drug delivery, plasma concentration
MeSH terms
Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer, Acrylic Resins, Animals, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Calcium Channel Blockers, Caprolactam, Chemistry, Physical, Dialysis, Half-Life, Hypertension, Male, Microspheres, Nifedipine, Particle Size, Polyglycolic Acid, Polymers, Rats, Inbred SHR, Lactic Acid, Area Under Curve, Rats, Chemical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review