Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional characterization of agonists at recombinant human 5‐HT2A, 5‐HT2B and 5‐HT2C receptors in CHO‐K1 cells

Open access
Porter, R H P, Benwell, K R, Lamb, H, Malcolm, C S, Allen, N H, Revell, D F, Adams, D R, Sheardown, M J·1999·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

The goal of this study was to characterize the agonist pharmacology of human 5‐HT 2A, 5‐HT 2B and 5‐HT 2C (VSV) receptors expressed in CHO‐K1 (Chinese hamster ovary) cells. We used a fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR) which allows rapid detection of rises in intracellular calcium levels upon the addition of agonists. Stimulation of all three receptors by 5‐HT caused a robust concentration dependent increase in intracellular calcium levels. No such effect was observed from non‐transfected control CHO‐K1 cells. The rank order of potency of agonists at the different receptor subtypes varied. Tryptamines, BW‐723C86, d‐norfenfluramine, Ro 60‐0175 and LSD exhibited the following rank order of potency; 5‐HT 2B>5‐HT 2C>5‐HT 2A. Piperazines such as m‐Chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), ORG‐12962, MK‐212 and also ORG‐37684 exhibited a rank order of potency of 5‐HT 2C>5‐HT 2B>5‐HT 2A. The phenylisopropylamines DOI and DOB had a rank order of 5‐HT 2A>5‐HT 2B>5‐HT 2C. Many agonists tested had partial agonist actions when compared to 5‐HT, and a wide range of relative efficacies were exhibited, which was cell line dependent. For example, mCPP had a relative efficacy of 65% at 5‐HT 2C receptors but <25% at either 5‐HT 2A or 5‐HT 2B receptors. Interpretation of literature values of functional assays using different cell lines, different receptor expression levels and different receptor isoforms, is complex. Species differences and the previous use of antagonist radioligands to characterize agonist potency in binding assays emphasizes the importance of studying agonists in the same experiment using the same assay conditions and parental cell lines. British Journal of Pharmacology (1999) 128, 13–20; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0702751

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702751

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Porter, R. H. P., Benwell, K. R., Lamb, H., Malcolm, C. S., Allen, N. H., Revell, D. F., Adams, D. R., & Sheardown, M. J.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-09
Volume
128
Issue
1
Pages
13-20
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2079825367
Cited by
358
References
2
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional characterization of agonists at recombinant human 5‐HT2A, 5‐HT2B and 5‐HT2C receptors in CHO‐K1 cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjp.0702751
The paper
Porter, R. H. P., Benwell, K. R., Lamb, H., Malcolm, C. S., Allen, N. H., Revell, D. F., Adams, D. R., & Sheardown, M. J. (1999). Functional characterization of agonists at recombinant human 5‐HT2A, 5‐HT2B and 5‐HT2C receptors in CHO‐K1 cells. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0702751

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.