Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Delayed administration of interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist protects against transient cerebral ischaemia in the rat

Open access
Mulcahy, Nicholas J, Ross, Jerard, Rothwell, Nancy J, Loddick, Sarah A·2003·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

The cytokine interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) has been implicated in ischaemic, excitotoxic and traumatic brain damage in rodents. The naturally occurring IL‐1 receptor antagonist (IL‐1ra) markedly reduces neuronal injury in these conditions. However, the effects of IL‐1ra on focal, transient cerebral ischaemia in the rat, which is of major clinical relevance, have not been reported. The objectives of this study were to test the effects of IL‐1ra on cell death after temporary cerebral ischaemia, and to investigate the therapeutic time window for IL‐1ra treatment. Ischaemia was induced by temporary (60 min) occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO) in rats, via surgical insertion (and subsequent removal) of a thread into the internal carotid artery. Damage was quantified at various times after MCAO to investigate the temporal progression of damage and establish an appropriate time to assess the effects of IL‐1ra on cell death. Cell death was complete 18–24 h after temporary MCAO. Intracerebroventricular injection of IL‐1ra (10 μ g) at the time of MCAO and 60 min later reduced the lesion volume measured 24 h (57% reduction) or 48 h (52% reduction) after MCAO. Cell death was also significantly reduced when IL‐1ra (20 μ g) was administered as a single injection, 1 h (47%), 2 h (57%) or 3 h (46%) after MCAO, when compared to vehicle. These data show that IL‐1ra markedly reduces cell death even when administration is delayed until 3 h after induction of reversible, focal cerebral ischaemia in the rat, and support our proposal that IL‐1ra may be of therapeutic benefit in stroke. British Journal of Pharmacology (2003) 140, 471–476. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0705462

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705462

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Mulcahy, N. J., Ross, J., Rothwell, N. J., & Loddick, S. A.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10
Volume
140
Issue
3
Pages
471-476
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2141580911
Cited by
185
References
1
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delayed administration of interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist protects against transient cerebral ischaemia in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705462
The paper
Mulcahy, N. J., Ross, J., Rothwell, N. J., & Loddick, S. A. (2003). Delayed administration of interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist protects against transient cerebral ischaemia in the rat. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705462

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.