Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibition of the human two‐pore domain potassium channel, TREK‐1, by fluoxetine and its metabolite norfluoxetine

Open access
Kennard, Louise E, Chumbley, Justin R, Ranatunga, Kishani M, Armstrong, Stephanie J, Veale, Emma L, Mathie, Alistair·2005·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Block of the human two‐pore domain potassium (2‐PK) channel TREK‐1 by fluoxetine (Prozac R) and its active metabolite, norfluoxetine, was investigated using whole‐cell patch‐clamp recording of currents through recombinant channels in tsA 201 cells. Fluoxetine produced a concentration‐dependent inhibition of TREK‐1 current that was reversible on wash. The IC 50 for block was 19 μM. Block by fluoxetine was voltage‐independent. Fluoxetine (100 μM) produced an 84% inhibition of TREK‐1 currents, but only a 31% block of currents through a related 2‐PK channel, TASK‐3. Norfluoxetine was a more potent inhibitor of TREK‐1 currents with an IC 50 of 9 μM. Block by norfluoxetine was also voltage‐independent. Truncation of the C‐terminus of TREK‐1 (Δ89) resulted in a loss of channel function, which could be restored by intracellular acidification or the mutation E306A. The mutation E306A alone increased basal TREK‐1 current and resulted in a loss of the slow phase of TREK‐1 activation. Progressive deletion of the C‐terminus of TREK‐1 had no effect on the inhibition of the channel by fluoxetine. The E306A mutation, on the other hand, reduced the magnitude of fluoxetine inhibition, with 100 μM producing only a 40% inhibition. It is concluded that fluoxetine and norfluoxetine are potent inhibitors of TREK‐1. Block of TREK‐1 by fluoxetine may have important consequences when the drug is used clinically in the treatment of depression. British Journal of Pharmacology (2005) 144, 821–829. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706068

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706068

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Kennard, L. E., Chumbley, J. R., Ranatunga, K. M., Armstrong, S. J., Veale, E. L., & Mathie, A.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03
Volume
144
Issue
6
Pages
821-829
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2151173182
Cited by
201
References
1
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of the human two‐pore domain potassium channel, TREK‐1, by fluoxetine and its metabolite norfluoxetine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706068
The paper
Kennard, L. E., Chumbley, J. R., Ranatunga, K. M., Armstrong, S. J., Veale, E. L., & Mathie, A. (2005). Inhibition of the human two‐pore domain potassium channel, TREK‐1, by fluoxetine and its metabolite norfluoxetine. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706068

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.