The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heterotrimeric G‐proteins: a short history
Open accessAbstract
Some 865 genes in man encode G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). The heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide‐binding proteins (G‐proteins) function to transduce signals from this vast panoply of receptors to effector systems including ion channels and enzymes that alter the rate of production, release or degradation of intracellular second messengers. However, it was not until the 1970s that the existence of such transducing proteins was even seriously suggested. Combinations of bacterial toxins that mediate their effects via covalent modification of the α‐subunit of certain G‐proteins and mutant cell lines that fail to generate cyclic AMP in response to agonists because they either fail to express or express a malfunctional G‐protein allowed their identification and purification. Subsequent to initial cloning efforts, cloning by homology has defined the human G‐proteins to derive from 35 genes, 16 encoding α‐subunits, five β and 14 γ. All function as guanine nucleotide exchange on–off switches and are mechanistically similar to other proteins that are enzymic GTPases. Although not readily accepted initially, it is now well established that β/γ complexes mediate as least as many functions as the α‐subunits. The generation of chimeras between different α‐subunits defined the role of different sections of the primary/secondary sequence and crystal structures and cocrystals with interacting proteins have given detailed understanding of their molecular structure and basis of function. Finally, further modifications of such chimeras have generated a range of G‐protein α‐subunits with greater promiscuity to interact across GPCR classes and initiated the use of such modified G‐proteins in drug discovery programmes. British Journal of Pharmacology (2006) 147, S46–S55. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706405
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structure and dynamics of GPCR signaling complexes
Hilger, D., Masureel, M., & Kobilka, B. K. (2018) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-017-0011-7 · Cited by 969
A Cardiovascular Disease-Linked Gut Microbial Metabolite Acts via Adrenergic Receptors
Nemet, I., Saha, P. P., Gupta, N., Zhu, W., Romano, K. A., Skye, S. M., Cajka, T., Mohan, M. L., Li, L., Wu, Y., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.016 · Cited by 784
Community guidelines for GPCR ligand bias: IUPHAR review 32
Kolb, P., Kenakin, T., Alexander, S. P. H., Bermudez, M., Bohn, L. M., Breinholt, C. S., Bouvier, M., Hill, S. J., Kostenis, E., Martemyanov, K. A., et al. (2022) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.15811 · Cited by 232
Ins and outs of GPCR signaling in primary cilia
Schou, K. B., Pedersen, L. B., & Christensen, S. T. (2015) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201540530 · Cited by 221
Ion channels and signaling in the pituitary gland
Stojilkovic, S. S., Tabak, J., & Bertram, R. (2010) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2010-0005 · Cited by 229
Strategies to Discover Unexpected Targets for Drugs Active at G Protein–Coupled Receptors
Allen, J. A., & Roth, B. L. (2011) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010510-100553 · Cited by 216
Granberg, K. L., Sakamaki, S., Larsson, N., Bergström, F., Fuchigami, R., Niwa, Y., Ryberg, E., Backmark, A., Kato, H., Miyazaki, S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c02184 · Cited by 26
Blackwell, K. T., & Jedrzejewska‐Szmek, J. (2013) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1240 · Cited by 17
Leemann, S., & Kleinlogel, S. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.01.27.525823 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Milligan, G., & Kostenis, E.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S46-55
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W1606957740
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.