Patient compliance and periodontal outcomes: Question: Does a patient's degree of compliance with appointments affect the risk of tooth loss during supportive periodontal treatment?
Abstract
Data sources PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched until 2014. Reference lists from the articles were examinedStudy selectionTwo authors independently searched for randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohorts with a mean follow up period of at least five years.Data extraction and synthesis Quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and the data were extracted on a specially designed form. The primary outcome was calculated as risk ratio of tooth loss (RRTL). Risk difference of tooth loss (RDTL) and weighted mean difference of tooth loss rate (WDTLR) were also calculated.Results One prospective and seven retrospective cohort studies including 1409 participants were included. The pooled RRTL was calculated as 0.56 (CI: 0.38,0.82) P<0.01, while the pooled RDTL was calculated as -0.05 (CI: -0.08, -0.01) p<0.01. Based on the risk difference, the NNT was calculated as 20.Conclusions Tooth loss rate was significantly lower in the regular compliance group over the five years. To prevent one extraction, 20 teeth have to be maintained with regular compliance for more than five years.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite lack of consistency among studies in type and frequency of instruction and motivation, higher compliance encourages improvement in clinical outcomes.
“and despite the lack of consistency among studies in terms of type and frequency of instruction and motivation, higher compliance encourages the improvement in clinical outcomes [42–45].”
Cites
Ōnishi, A., & Furukawa, T. A. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.002 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Wilson, T. G., Hale, S., & Temple, R. (1993) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.1993.64.4.311 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The Psychology of Patient Compliance: A Focused Review of the Literature
Umaki, T. M., Umaki, M. R., & Cobb, C. M. (2011) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.2011.110344 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abbinante, A., Antonacci, A., Antonioni, M., Butera, A., Castaldi, M., Cotellessa, S., Di Marco, C., Gangale, M., Izzetti, R., Luperini, M., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1155/2024/8592336 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pachêco-Pereira, C., & Spivakovsky, S.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- ORCID
- Spivakovsky, Silvia
- Venue
- Evidence-Based Dentistry
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-22
- ISSN
- 1462-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5446
- OpenAlex
- W2326094539
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Evidence-Based Dentistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
- Keywords
- medication adherence, periodontal treatment, tooth loss, periodontal outcomes, tooth extraction, number needed to treat, periodontal maintenance
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Patient Compliance, Periodontal Diseases, Tooth Loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review