Cited by 109Food composition and propertiesNatural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesPotato Plant Research

Glycaemic index of parboiled rice depends on the severity of processing: study in type 2 diabetic subjects

Larsen, HN, Rasmussen, OW, Rasmussen, PH, Alstrup, KK, Biswas, SK, Tetens, I, Thilsted, SH, Hermansen, K·2000·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To study the influence of parboiling and the severity of the process on glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to rice in type 2 diabetes. Moreover, to examine changes in starch structure related to parboiling, which may affect the metabolic responses and digestibility. Design Nine type 2 diabetic subjects ingested four test meals: white bread (WB) and three meals of cooked polished rice of the same variety being non-parboiled (NP), mildly traditionally parboiled (TP) and severely pressure parboiled (PP). The participants ingested the test meals (50 g available carbohydrates) on separate occasions after an overnight fast. Setting Outpatient clinic, Dept. Endocrinology and Metabolism, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Results All three rice samples elicited lower postprandial plasma glucose response (NP: 335+/-43; TP: 274+/-53; PP: 231+/-37 mmol/1*180 min.; means+/-s.e.m.) than white bread (626+/-80; P Conclusions All rice test meals were low-glycaemic in type 2 diabetic subjects. There was no effect of TP on glycaemic index, whereas PP reduced the glycaemic index by almost 30% compared to NP. Sponsorship The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Aarhus University Hospital, Danish International Development Assistance (DANIDA), Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the 'Konsul Johannes Fogh-Nielsens og Fru Ella Fogh-Nielsens Legat' foundation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600969

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 109

Authors
Larsen, H., Rasmussen, O., Rasmussen, P., Alstrup, K., Biswas, S., Tetens, I., Thilsted, S., & Hermansen, K.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BD)
Corresponding author
Larsen, HN
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2000-05-01
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
380-385
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2004614462
Cited by
109
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Potato Plant Research
Keywords
parboiled rice, glycemic index, type 2 diabetes, insulin response, starch structure, amylose-lipid complex, rice processing, postprandial blood glucose, white bread
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Calorimetry, Differential Scanning, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Female, Food Handling, Hot Temperature, Humans, Insulin, Kinetics, Male, Middle Aged, Oryza, Starch, Thermodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review