CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GATA‐1 forms distinct activating and repressive complexes in erythroid cells

Rodriguez, Patrick, Bonte, Edgar, Krijgsveld, Jeroen, Kolodziej, Katarzyna E, Guyot, Boris, Heck, Albert JR, Vyas, Paresh, de Boer, Ernie, Grosveld, Frank, Strouboulis, John·2005·The EMBO Journal
DOI 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600702
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600702

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Anderson KP, Crable SC, Lingrel JB (1998) Multiple proteins binding to a GATA‐E box‐GATA motif regulate the erythroid Kruppel‐like factor (EKLF) gene. J Biol Chem 273: 14347–14354 · DOI
  2. Blobel GA, Nakajima T, Eckner R, Montminy M, Orkin SH (1998) CREB‐binding protein cooperates with transcription factor GATA‐1 and is required for erythroid differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 2061–2066 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Blobel GA, Weiss MJ (2001) Nuclear factors that regulate erythropoiesis. In Disorders of Hemoglobin: Genetics, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Management, Steinberg MH, Forget BG, Higgs DR, Nagel RL (eds) pp 72–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  4. Bochar DA, Savard J, Wang W, Lafleur DW, Moore P, Cote J, Shiekhattar R (2000) A family of chromatin remodeling factors related to Williams syndrome transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 1038–1043 · DOI
  5. Cantor AB, Orkin SH (2002) Transcriptional regulation of erythropoiesis: an affair involving multiple partners. Oncogene 21: 3368–3376 · DOI
  6. Chang AN, Cantor AB, Fujiwara Y, Lodish MB, Droho S, Crispino JD, Orkin SH (2002) GATA‐factor dependence of the multitype zinc‐finger protein FOG‐1 for its essential role in megakaryopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 9237–9242 · DOI
  7. Chen J, Bender TP (2001) A novel system to identify Myb target promoters in friend murine erythroleukemia cells. Blood Cells Mol Dis 27: 429–436 · DOI
  8. Corona DF, Tamkun JW (2004) Multiple roles for ISWI in transcription, chromosome organization and DNA replication. Biochim Biophys Acta 1677: 113–119 · DOI
  9. Crispino JD, Lodish MB, MacKay JP, Orkin SH (1999) Use of altered specificity mutants to probe a specific protein–protein interaction in differentiation: the GATA‐1:FOG complex. Mol Cell 3: 219–228 · DOI
  10. de Boer E, Rodriguez P, Bonte E, Krijgsveld J, Katsantoni E, Heck A, Grosveld F, Strouboulis J (2003) Efficient biotinylation and single‐step purification of tagged transcription factors in mammalian cells and transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 7480–7485 · DOI
  11. Doan LL, Porter SD, Duan Z, Flubacher MM, Montoya D, Tsichlis PN, Horwitz M, Gilks CB, Grimes HL (2004) Targeted transcriptional repression of Gfi1 by GFI1 and GFI1B in lymphoid cells. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 2508–2519 · DOI
  12. Du J, Stankiewicz MJ, Liu Y, Xi Q, Schmitz JE, Lekstrom‐Himes JA, Ackerman SJ (2002) Novel combinatorial interactions of GATA‐1, PU.1, and C/EBPepsilon isoforms regulate transcription of the gene encoding eosinophil granule major basic protein. J Biol Chem 277: 43481–43494 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Duan Z, Horwitz M (2003) Gfi‐1 oncoproteins in hematopoiesis. Hematology 8: 339–344 · DOI
  14. Eberharter A, Ferrari S, Langst G, Straub T, Imhof A, Varga‐Weisz P, Wilm M, Becker PB (2001) Acf1, the largest subunit of CHRAC, regulates ISWI‐induced nucleosome remodelling. EMBO J 20: 3781–3788 · DOI
  15. Elefanty AG, Antoniou M, Custodio N, Carmo‐Fonseca M, Grosveld FG (1996) GATA transcription factors associate with a novel class of nuclear bodies in erythroblasts and megakaryocytes. EMBO J 15: 319–333 · DOI
  16. Enver T, Heyworth CM, Dexter TM (1998) Do stem cells play dice? Blood 92: 348–351, discussion 352 · DOI
  17. Feng Q, Cao R, Xia L, Erdjument‐Bromage H, Tempst P, Zhang Y (2002) Identification and functional characterization of the p66/p68 components of the MeCP1 complex. Mol Cell Biol 22: 536–546 · DOI
  18. Feng Q, Zhang Y (2001) The MeCP1 complex represses transcription through preferential binding, remodeling, and deacetylating methylated nucleosomes. Genes Dev 15: 827–832
  19. Fox AH, Liew C, Holmes M, Kowalski K, Mackay J, Crossley M (1999) Transcriptional cofactors of the FOG family interact with GATA proteins by means of multiple zinc fingers. EMBO J 18: 2812–2822 · DOI
  20. Fujita N, Jaye DL, Geigerman C, Akyildiz A, Mooney MR, Boss JM, Wade PA (2004) MTA3 and the Mi‐2/NuRD complex regulate cell fate during B lymphocyte differentiation. Cell 119: 75–86 · DOI
  21. Fujita N, Jaye DL, Kajita M, Geigerman C, Moreno CS, Wade PA (2003) MTA3, a Mi‐2/NuRD complex subunit, regulates an invasive growth pathway in breast cancer. Cell 113: 207–219 · DOI
  22. Garcon L, Lacout C, Svinartchouk F, Le Couedic JP, Villeval JL, Vainchenker W, Dumenil D (2005) Gfi‐1B plays a critical role in terminal differentiation of normal and transformed erythroid progenitor cells. Blood 105: 1448–1455 · DOI
  23. Grass JA, Boyer ME, Pal S, Wu J, Weiss MJ, Bresnick EH (2003) GATA‐1‐dependent transcriptional repression of GATA‐2 via disruption of positive autoregulation and domain‐wide chromatin remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8811–8816 · DOI
  24. Guyot B, Valverde‐Garduno V, Porcher C, Vyas P (2004) Deletion of the major GATA1 enhancer HS 1 does not affect eosinophil GATA1 expression and eosinophil differentiation. Blood 104: 89–91 · DOI
  25. Hutchins AS, Mullen AC, Lee HW, Sykes KJ, High FA, Hendrich BD, Bird AP, Reiner SL (2002) Gene silencing quantitatively controls the function of a developmental trans‐activator. Mol Cell 10: 81–91 · DOI
  26. Kadam S, Emerson BM (2003) Transcriptional specificity of human SWI/SNF BRG1 and BRM chromatin remodeling complexes. Mol Cell 11: 377–389 · DOI
  27. Lachman HM, Skoultchi AI (1984) Expression of c‐myc changes during differentiation of mouse erythroleukaemia cells. Nature 310: 592–594 · DOI
  28. Lahlil R, Lecuyer E, Herblot S, Hoang T (2004) SCL assembles a multifactorial complex that determines glycophorin A expression. Mol Cell Biol 24: 1439–1452 · DOI
  29. Lecuyer E, Hoang T (2004) SCL: from the origin of hematopoiesis to stem cells and leukemia. Exp Hematol 32: 11–24 · DOI
  30. Letting DL, Chen YY, Rakowski C, Reedy S, Blobel GA (2004) Context‐dependent regulation of GATA‐1 by friend of GATA‐1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 476–481 · DOI
  31. Litt MD, Simpson M, Recillas‐Targa F, Prioleau MN, Felsenfeld G (2001) Transitions in histone acetylation reveal boundaries of three separately regulated neighboring loci. EMBO J 20: 2224–2235 · DOI
  32. Ng HH, Zhang Y, Hendrich B, Johnson CA, Turner BM, Erdjument‐Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D, Bird A (1999) MBD2 is a transcriptional repressor belonging to the MeCP1 histone deacetylase complex. Nat Genet 23: 58–61 · DOI
  33. Nichols KE, Crispino JD, Poncz M, White JG, Orkin SH, Maris JM, Weiss MJ (2000) Familial dyserythropoietic anaemia and thrombocytopenia due to an inherited mutation in GATA1. Nat Genet 24: 266–270 · DOI
  34. O'Neill DW, Schoetz SS, Lopez RA, Castle M, Rabinowitz L, Shor E, Krawchuk D, Goll MG, Renz M, Seelig HP, Han S, Seong RH, Park SD, Agalioti T, Munshi N, Thanos D, Erdjument‐Bromage H, Tempst P, Bank A (2000) An ikaros‐containing chromatin‐remodeling complex in adult‐type erythroid cells. Mol Cell Biol 20: 7572–7582 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Orkin SH (2000) Diversification of haematopoietic stem cells to specific lineages. Nat Rev Genet 1: 57–64 · DOI
  36. Osada H, Grutz G, Axelson H, Forster A, Rabbitts TH (1995) Association of erythroid transcription factors: complexes involving the LIM protein RBTN2 and the zinc‐finger protein GATA1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 9585–9589 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Pal S, Cantor AB, Johnson KD, Moran TB, Boyer ME, Orkin SH, Bresnick EH (2004) Coregulator‐dependent facilitation of chromatin occupancy by GATA‐1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 980–985 · DOI
  38. Pevny L, Lin CS, D'Agati V, Simon MC, Orkin SH, Costantini F (1995) Development of hematopoietic cells lacking transcription factor GATA‐1. Development 121: 163–172 · DOI
  39. Porcher C, Swat W, Rockwell K, Fujiwara Y, Alt FW, Orkin SH (1996) The T cell leukemia oncoprotein SCL/tal‐1 is essential for development of all hematopoietic lineages. Cell 86: 47–57 · DOI
  40. Querfurth E, Schuster M, Kulessa H, Crispino JD, Doderlein G, Orkin SH, Graf T, Nerlov C (2000) Antagonism between C/EBPbeta and FOG in eosinophil lineage commitment of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors. Genes Dev 14: 2515–2525 · DOI
  41. Rylski M, Welch JJ, Chen YY, Letting DL, Diehl JA, Chodosh LA, Blobel GA, Weiss MJ (2003) GATA‐1‐mediated proliferation arrest during erythroid maturation. Mol Cell Biol 23: 5031–5042 · DOI
  42. Saleque S, Cameron S, Orkin SH (2002) The zinc‐finger proto‐oncogene Gfi‐1b is essential for development of the erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages. Genes Dev 16: 301–306 · DOI
  43. Shimizu R, Takahashi S, Ohneda K, Engel JD, Yamamoto M (2001) In vivo requirements for GATA‐1 functional domains during primitive and definitive erythropoiesis. EMBO J 20: 5250–5260 · DOI
  44. Stopka T, Skoultchi AI (2003) The ISWI ATPase Snf2h is required for early mouse development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 14097–14102 · DOI
  45. Tsang AP, Fujiwara Y, Hom DB, Orkin SH (1998) Failure of megakaryopoiesis and arrested erythropoiesis in mice lacking the GATA‐1 transcriptional cofactor FOG. Genes Dev 12: 1176–1188 · DOI
  46. Tsang AP, Visvader JE, Turner CA, Fujiwara Y, Yu C, Weiss MJ, Crossley M, Orkin SH (1997) FOG, a multitype zinc finger protein, acts as a cofactor for transcription factor GATA‐1 in erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation. Cell 90: 109–119 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Visvader JE, Mao X, Fujiwara Y, Hahm K, Orkin SH (1997) The LIM‐domain binding protein Ldb1 and its partner LMO2 act as negative regulators of erythroid differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 13707–13712 · DOI
  48. Wadman IA, Osada H, Grutz GG, Agulnick AD, Westphal H, Forster A, Rabbitts TH (1997) The LIM‐only protein Lmo2 is a bridging molecule assembling an erythroid, DNA‐binding complex which includes the TAL1, E47, GATA‐1 and Ldb1/NLI proteins. EMBO J 16: 3145–3157 · DOI
  49. Weiss MJ, Yu C, Orkin SH (1997) Erythroid‐cell‐specific properties of transcription factor GATA‐1 revealed by phenotypic rescue of a gene‐targeted cell line. Mol Cell Biol 17: 1642–1651 · DOI
  50. Welch JJ, Watts JA, Vakoc CR, Yao Y, Wang H, Hardison RC, Blobel GA, Chodosh LA, Weiss MJ (2004) Global regulation of erythroid gene expression by transcription factor GATA‐1. Blood 104: 3136–3147 · DOI
  51. Westin G, Gerster T, Muller MM, Schaffner G, Schaffner W (1987) OVEC, a versatile system to study transcription in mammalian cells and cell‐free extracts. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 6787–6798 · DOI
  52. Whyatt D, Lindeboom F, Karis A, Ferreira R, Milot E, Hendriks R, de Bruijn M, Langeveld A, Gribnau J, Grosveld F, Philipsen S (2000) An intrinsic but cell‐nonautonomous defect in GATA‐1‐overexpressing mouse erythroid cells. Nature 406: 519–524 · DOI
  53. Whyatt DJ, deBoer E, Grosveld F (1993) The two zinc finger‐like domains of GATA‐1 have different DNA binding specificities. EMBO J 12: 4993–5005 · DOI
  54. Williams CJ, Naito T, Arco PG, Seavitt JR, Cashman SM, De Souza B, Qi X, Keables P, Von Andrian UH, Georgopoulos K (2004) The chromatin remodeler Mi‐2beta is required for CD4 expression and T cell development. Immunity 20: 719–733 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodriguez, P., Bonte, E., Krijgsveld, J., Kolodziej, K. E., Guyot, B., Heck, A. J., Vyas, P., de Boer, E., Grosveld, F., & Strouboulis, J.
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-05-26
Volume
24
Issue
13
Pages
2354-2366
ISSN
  • 0261-4189
  • 1460-2075
DOI
10.1038/sj.emboj.7600702
Cited by
254
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review