Cited by 144Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMemory and Neural MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Hyperphosphorylated tau in parahippocampal cortex impairs place learning in aged mice expressing wild‐type human tau

Open access
Kimura, Tetsuya, Yamashita, Shunji, Fukuda, Tetsuya, Park, Jun‐Mi, Murayama, Miyuki, Mizoroki, Tatsuya, Yoshiike, Yuji, Sahara, Naruhiko +1 more·2007·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

To investigate how tau affects neuronal function during neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) formation, we examined the behavior, neural activity, and neuropathology of mice expressing wild-type human tau. Here, we demonstrate that aged (>20 months old) mice display impaired place learning and memory, even though they do not form NFTs or display neuronal loss. However, soluble hyperphosphorylated tau and synapse loss were found in the same regions. Mn-enhanced MRI showed that the activity of the parahippocampal area is strongly correlated with the decline of memory as assessed by the Morris water maze. Taken together, the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau and synapse loss in aged mice, leading to inhibition of neural activity in parahippocampal areas, including the entorhinal cortex, may underlie place learning impairment. Thus, the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau that occurs before NFT formation in entorhinal cortex may contribute to the memory problems seen in Alzheimer's disease (AD).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601917

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The AT8 sites are physiological sites for phosphorylation, but they are not always phosphorylated.

    “The AT8 sites are physiological sites for phosphorylation, but they are not always phosphorylated (Kimura et al., 2007;Verwer et al., 2007).”

    From Regulation of Mitochondrial Transport and Inter-Microtubule Spacing by Tau Phosphorylation at the Sites Hyperphosphorylated in Alzheimer's Disease (2012) · cites this paper as Kimura et al., 2007

    The section on PHF1-site phosphorylation identifies AT8 as recognizing tau phosphorylated at Ser202 and Ser205, and reports AT8 immunoreactivity in the studied mice. The Discussion says AT8-site phosphorylation did not increase with aging in those mice, but it does not establish that phosphorylation at these sites is physiological or that the sites are sometimes unphosphorylated. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The AT8 sites (Ser199/Ser202/Thr205) are physiological phosphorylation sites and markers of hyperphosphorylation in Alzheimer's disease.

    “The AT8 sites are not only physiological phosphorylation sites (Kimura et al., 2007;Verwer et al., 2007) but also markers of hyperphosphorylation in Alzheimer's disease (Plattner et al., 2006).”

    From Regulation of Mitochondrial Transport and Inter-Microtubule Spacing by Tau Phosphorylation at the Sites Hyperphosphorylated in Alzheimer's Disease (2012) · cites this paper as Kimura et al., 2007

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports AT8 phosphorylation in both adult and aged mice expressing wild-type human tau, without an age-related increase. This supports the narrower point that AT8 phosphorylation can occur without age-related hyperphosphorylation, but the study does not establish that the sites are physiological in normal animals; it also identifies the AT8 sites as Ser202 and Ser205, not Ser199/Ser202/Thr205. The Alzheimer's disease marker claim is attributed to Plattner et al., not Kimura et al., in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kimura, T., Yamashita, S., Fukuda, T., Park, J., Murayama, M., Mizoroki, T., Yoshiike, Y., Sahara, N., & Takashima, A.
Affiliations
RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
Corresponding author
Takashima, Akihiko
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2007-11-15
Volume
26
Issue
24
Pages
5143-5152
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2053535174
Cited by
144
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
hyperphosphorylated tau, parahippocampal cortex, place learning, spatial memory, aging, synaptic loss, neurofibrillary tangles, entorhinal cortex, neuronal activity, Alzheimer's disease, memory impairment
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Mice, Transgenic, Phosphorylation, Synapses, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Entorhinal Cortex, Maze Learning, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review